Predictors of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (POPF) After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Clinical Significance of the Mean Platelet Volume (MPV)/Platelet Count Ratio as a New Predictor.
Fistula
Mean platelet volume
Pancreatic duct diameter
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Soft pancreas
Journal
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
ISSN: 1873-4626
Titre abrégé: J Gastrointest Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9706084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
14
04
2021
accepted:
21
08
2021
pubmed:
22
9
2021
medline:
15
3
2022
entrez:
21
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study, it was aimed to determine the predictors of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and clinical significance of mean platelet volume (MPV)/total platelet count ratio (MPR) as a new predictor for CR-POPF. A total of 105 patients who underwent PD consecutively due to periampullary located diseases were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as CR-POPF and no postoperative pancreatic fistula (No-POPF). Demographic parameters, preoperative serum-based inflammatory indicators, surgical procedures, intraoperative findings, and histopathological parameters were recorded retrospectively from prospectively recorded patient files and compared between the groups. CR-POPF occurred in 16 (15.2%) patients: 8 (7.6%) were grade B and 8 (7.6%) were grade C according to the ISGPF classification. In univariate analysis, intraoperative blood loss > 580 mL (OR: 5.25, p = 0.001), intraoperative blood transfusion (OR: 5.96, p = 0.002), intraoperative vasoconstrictor medication (OR: 4.17, p = 0.014), benign histopathology (OR: 3.51, p = 0.036), and poor differentiation in malignant tumors (OR: 4.07, p = 0.044) were significantly higher in the CR-POPF group, but not significant in multivariate analysis. Soft pancreatic consistency (OR: 6.08, p = 0.013), pancreatic duct diameter < 2.5 mm (OR: 17.15, p < 0.001), and MPR < 28.9 (OR: 13.91, p < 0.001) were the independent predictors of CR-POPF according to multivariate analysis. Neoadjuvant treatment history and simultaneous vascular resection were less likely to cause CR-POPF development; however, they were insignificant. Soft pancreatic consistency, pancreatic duct diameter, and preoperative MPR were the independent predictors of CR-POPF following PD. Decreased MPR is a strong predictor for CR-POPF and should be considered when deciding treatment strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34545541
doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05136-5
pii: 10.1007/s11605-021-05136-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
387-397Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
Références
Kawai M, Yamaue H. Analysis of clinical trials evaluating complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a new era of pancreatic surgery. Surg Today. 2010 Nov;40(11):1011-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-4245-9
Kawaida H, Kono H, Hosomura N, Amemiya H, Itakura J, Fujii H, Ichikawa D. Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 28;25(28):3722-3737.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3722
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
Pedrazzoli S. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): A systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(19):e6858.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006858
Li Z, Wei A, Xia N, Zheng L, Yang D, Ye J, Xiong J, Hu W. Blumgart anastomosis reduces the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17896.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74812-4
Eguchi H, Iwagami Y, Matsushita K, Tomimaru Y, Akita H, Noda T, Gotoh K, Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Mori M, Doki Y. Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy regarding incidence of delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Nov;405(7):921-928.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01982-0
Williamsson C, Stenvall K, Wennerblom J, Andersson R, Andersson B, Tingstedt B. Predictive Factors for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula-A Swedish Nationwide Register-Based Study. World J Surg. 2020 Dec;44(12):4207-4213.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05735-4
Kawai M, Yamaue H, Jang JY, Uesaka K, Unno M, Nakamura M, Fujii T, Satoi S, Choi SH, Sho M, Fukumoto T, Kim SC, Hong TH, Izumo W, Yoon DS, Amano R, Park SJ, Choi SB, Yu HC, Kim JS, Ahn YJ, Kim H, Ashida R, Hirono S, Heo JS, Song KB, Park JS, Yamamoto M, Shimokawa T, Kim SW. Propensity score-matched analysis of internal stent vs external stent for pancreatojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy: Japanese-Korean cooperative project. Pancreatology. 2020 Jul;20(5):984-991.
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.06.014
Andreasi V, Partelli S, Crippa S, Balzano G, Tamburrino D, Muffatti F, Belfiori G, Cirocchi R, Falconi M. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of omental or falciform ligament wrapping during pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2020 Sep;22(9):1227-1239.
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.05.003
Kone LB, Maker VK, Banulescu M, Maker AV. A propensity score analysis of over 12,000 pancreaticojejunal anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy: does technique impact the clinically relevant fistula rate? HPB (Oxford). 2020 Oct;22(10):1394-1401.
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.01.002
Eshmuminov D, Schneider MA, Tschuor C, Raptis DA, Kambakamba P, Muller X, Lesurtel M, Clavien PA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula rates using the updated 2016 International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula definition in patients undergoing pancreatic resection with soft and hard pancreatic texture. HPB (Oxford). 2018 Nov;20(11):992-1003.
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.04.003
Solaini L, Atmaja BT, Watt J, Arumugam P, Hutchins RR, Abraham AT, Bhattacharya S, Kocher HM. Limited utility of inflammatory markers in the early detection of postoperative inflammatory complications after pancreatic resection: Cohort study and meta-analyses. Int J Surg. 2015 May;17:41-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.009
Kinaci E, Sevinc MM, Ozakay A, Bayrak S, Cakar E, Sari S. Intraoperative acidosis is a new predictor for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2016 Jun;15(3):302-9.
doi: 10.1016/S1499-3872(16)60068-1
Ikeguchi M, Hanaki T, Endo K, Suzuki K, Nakamura S, Sawata T, Shimizu T. C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio and Prognostic Nutritional Index Are Strong Prognostic Indicators of Survival in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J Pancreat Cancer. 2017 Jul 1;3(1):31-36.
doi: 10.1089/crpc.2017.0006
Sakamoto T, Yagyu Y, Uchinaka EI, Morimoto M, Hanaki T, Tokuyasu N, Honjo S, Fujiwara Y. Predictive Significance of C-reactive Protein-to-albumin Ratio for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Anticancer Res. 2019 Nov;39(11):6283-6290.
doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13838
Tesfamariam B. Involvement of platelets in tumor cell metastasis. Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jan;157:112-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.11.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.11.005
pubmed: 26615781
Pyo JS, Sohn JH, Kang G. Diagnostic and prognostic roles of the mean platelet volume in malignant tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Platelets. 2016 Dec;27(8):722-728.
doi: 10.3109/09537104.2016.1169265
Ellis RJ, Brock Hewitt D, Liu JB, Cohen ME, Merkow RP, Bentrem DJ, Bilimoria KY, Yang AD. Preoperative risk evaluation for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;119(8):1128-1134.
doi: 10.1002/jso.25464
Fang CH, Chen QS, Yang J, Xiang F, Fang ZS, Zhu W. Body Mass Index and Stump Morphology Predict an Increased Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1467-76.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3413-5
Araujo RLC, Silva RO, de Pádua Souza C, Milani JM, Huguet F, Rezende AC, Gaujoux S. Does neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma increase postoperative morbidity? A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;121(5):881-892.
pubmed: 31994193
Gong L, Huang X, Wang L, Xiang C. The effect of preoperative biliary stents on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22714.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022714
Cheung TT, Poon RT, Chok KS, Chan AC, Tsang SH, Dai WC, Chan SC, Fan ST, Lo CM. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular reconstruction for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with borderline resectability. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17448-55.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17448
Huang W, Xiong JJ, Wan MH, Szatmary P, Bharucha S, Gomatos I, Nunes QM, Xia Q, Sutton R, Liu XB. Meta-analysis of subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy vs pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 28;21(20):6361-73.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6361
Dong Z, Xu J, Wang Z, Petrov MS. Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 6;2016(5):CD008914.
pmcid: 7156907
Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jan;216(1):1-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002
Miller BC, Christein JD, Behrman SW, Drebin JA, Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. A multi-institutional external validation of the fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jan;18(1):172-79; discussion 179-80.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2337-8
Martin AN, Narayanan S, Turrentine FE, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Zaydfudim VM. Pancreatic duct size and gland texture are associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy but not after distal pancreatectomy. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203841.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203841
Wang W, Zhang Z, Gu C, Liu Q, Liang Z, He W, Chen J, Lai J. The optimal choice for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A network meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Int J Surg. 2018 Sep;57:111-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.005
Yamamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Nara S, Esaki M, Shimada K, Kosuge T. A preoperative predictive scoring system for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2011 Dec;35(12):2747-55.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1253-x
Schmidt CM, Choi J, Powell ES, Yiannoutsos CT, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Wiebke EA, Madura JA, Lillemoe KD. Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical predictors and patient outcomes. HPB Surg. 2009;2009:404520.
doi: 10.1155/2009/404520
Shuji Suzuki, Mitsugi Shimoda, Jiro Shimazaki, Yukio Oshiro, Kiyotaka Nishida, N Orimoto. Assessment of preoperative clinicophysiological findings as risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int Surg 2021; doi: https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-20-00020.1
Korniluk A, Koper-Lenkiewicz OM, Kamińska J, Kemona H, Dymicka-Piekarska V. Mean Platelet Volume (MPV): New Perspectives for an Old Marker in the Course and Prognosis of Inflammatory Conditions. Mediators Inflamm. 2019 Apr 17;2019:9213074.
Balkwill F, Coussens LM. Cancer: an inflammatory link. Nature. 2004 Sep 23;431(7007):405-6.
doi: 10.1038/431405a
Mangalpally KK, Siqueiros-Garcia A, Vaduganathan M, Dong JF, Kleiman NS, Guthikonda S. Platelet activation patterns in platelet size sub-populations: differential responses to aspirin in vitro. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010 Oct;30(3):251-62.
doi: 10.1007/s11239-010-0489-x
Chen X, Li J, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wu J, Li Y, Cui X, Jiang X. Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of pretreatment mean platelet volume in cancer: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 27;10(10):e037614.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037614
Thompson CB, Jakubowski JA. The pathophysiology and clinical relevance of platelet heterogeneity. Blood. 1988 Jul;72(1):1-8.
doi: 10.1182/blood.V72.1.1.1
Butkiewicz AM, Kemona H, Dymicka-Piekarska V, Matowicka-Karna J, Radziwon P, Lipska A. Platelet count, mean platelet volume and thrombocytopoietic indices in healthy women and men. Thromb Res. 2006;118(2):199-204.
doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2005.06.021
Yagyu T, Saito H, Sakamoto T, Uchinaka E, Morimoto M, Hanaki T, Watanabe J, Matsunaga T, Yamamoto M, Tokuyasu N, Honjo S, Fujiwara Y. Decreased mean platelet volume predicts poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. BMC Surg. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):8.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00976-5
Gong X, Zhang L, Yang D, Xiao X, Wei L, Wu L. Mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio is associated with prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016 Aug 9(8), 16379-16386.
Yazici M, Kaya A, Kaya Y, Albayrak S, Cinemre H, Ozhan H. Lifestyle modification decreases the mean platelet volume in prehypertensive patients. Platelets. 2009 Feb;20(1):58-63.
doi: 10.1080/09537100802613449
Eicher JD, Chami N, Kacprowski T, Nomura A, Chen MH, Yanek LR, Tajuddin SM, Schick UM, Slater AJ, Pankratz N, Polfus L, Schurmann C, Giri A, Brody JA, Lange LA, Manichaikul A, Hill WD, Pazoki R, Elliot P, Evangelou E, Tzoulaki I, Gao H, Vergnaud AC, Mathias RA, Becker DM, Becker LC, Burt A, Crosslin DR, Lyytikäinen LP, Nikus K, Hernesniemi J, Kähönen M, Raitoharju E, Mononen N, Raitakari OT, Lehtimäki T, Cushman M, Zakai NA, Nickerson DA, Raffield LM, Quarells R, Willer CJ, Peloso GM, Abecasis GR, Liu DJ; Global Lipids Genetics Consortium, Deloukas P, Samani NJ, Schunkert H, Erdmann J; CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortium; Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium, Fornage M, Richard M, Tardif JC, Rioux JD, Dube MP, de Denus S, Lu Y, Bottinger EP, Loos RJ, Smith AV, Harris TB, Launer LJ, Gudnason V, Velez Edwards DR, Torstenson ES, Liu Y, Tracy RP, Rotter JI, Rich SS, Highland HM, Boerwinkle E, Li J, Lange E, Wilson JG, Mihailov E, Mägi R, Hirschhorn J, Metspalu A, Esko T, Vacchi-Suzzi C, Nalls MA, Zonderman AB, Evans MK, Engström G, Orho-Melander M, Melander O, O'Donoghue ML, Waterworth DM, Wallentin L, White HD, Floyd JS, Bartz TM, Rice KM, Psaty BM, Starr JM, Liewald DC, Hayward C, Deary IJ, Greinacher A, Völker U, Thiele T, Völzke H, van Rooij FJ, Uitterlinden AG, Franco OH, Dehghan A, Edwards TL, Ganesh SK, Kathiresan S, Faraday N, Auer PL, Reiner AP, Lettre G, Johnson AD. Platelet-Related Variants Identified by Exomechip Meta-analysis in 157,293 Individuals. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jul 7;99(1):40-55
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.05.005
Vasudeva K, Munshi A. Genetics of platelet traits in ischaemic stroke: focus on mean platelet volume and platelet count. Int J Neurosci. 2019 May;129(5):511-522.
doi: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1538991