Using Digital Ethnography to Understand the Experience of Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Journal
Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 2154-4212
Titre abrégé: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2021
01 02 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
11
9
2020
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
10
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To characterize the decision-making process and illness experience of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) using large-scale social media analysis. Digital ethnographic analysis of online posts identified through data mining was performed. Grounded theory methodology was applied to 200 posts via traditional hand coding. To supplement our qualitative approach, we applied a Latent Dirichlet Allocation probabilistic topic modeling process to review the entire data set of identified posts to ensure thematic saturation. There were 3451 posts by 2088 unique users from 117 websites worldwide that were identified via social media data mining. We found that the anonymity of online forums allowed for information and support exchange among women with POP. Our analysis revealed that the exchange of online information aids in the decision-making process and, in some instances, appears to be the primary source of information. There was confusion about the anatomical and surgical complexities of prolapse. Our study also identified misconceptions, perceived risk factors, prevention methods, and management recommendations that were discussed online. This large-scale online community-based analysis demonstrated the utility of social media to better understand women's experiences with POP. Thematic findings highlighted essential concerns and challenges involved in the surgical decision-making process and the understating of the anatomical complexity of sector defects, specifically to cystocele, rectocele, State specific defects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32910076
pii: 01436319-202102000-00033
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000938
pmc: PMC9354566
mid: NIHMS1610603
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e363-e367Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : U01 DK106786
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.
Références
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):137-42
pubmed: 22543763
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Mar;27(3):283-289
pubmed: 29634445
J Urol. 2020 May;203(5):962-968
pubmed: 31855097
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):322-7
pubmed: 25185629
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Apr;26(4):597-604
pubmed: 25516231
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Mar 15;19(1):45
pubmed: 30876415
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1783-90
pubmed: 24142054
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):332-8
pubmed: 26506161
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;27(5):380-4
pubmed: 26308198
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Feb;71(2):323-330
pubmed: 29781587
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Jul;23(7):1057-1064
pubmed: 28410343
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul/Aug;24(4):260-263
pubmed: 29309287
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):654.e1-654.e10
pubmed: 27319368
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan;21(1):5-26
pubmed: 19937315
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):90-7
pubmed: 23442506
BJU Int. 2020 Jun;125(6):759-760
pubmed: 32039554