Outcomes in modified transoral resection of diverticula for Zenker's diverticulum.
Diverticulectomy
Endoscopic laser approach
Modified transoral resection of diverticulum
Outcomes
Recurrence
Zenker’s diverticulum
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
17
12
2018
accepted:
09
03
2019
pubmed:
17
3
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
entrez:
17
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Transoral resection of Zenker's diverticulum (TORD) was first reported in 2010. We present results for our modified approach to transoral resection (MTORD)-full-thickness cricopharyngeal myectomy, diverticulum sac excision, and suture closure of the pharyngotomy-and evaluate its safety and efficacy compared to endoscopic stapling and open approaches. A retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent transoral resection of Zenker's diverticulum using MTORD, endoscopic stapler-assisted diverticulotomy (ESD), or trancervical diverticulectomy (TCD) from July 2009 to August 2017. Pre-operative evaluation included barium swallow and subjective characterization of swallowing dysfunction using the EAT-10 and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). Complications, length of hospitalization, recurrence, and revision rates were also evaluated. Of 92 patients reviewed, 18 underwent MTORD, 45 underwent ESD and 29 underwent TCD. Major complications were only observed in ESD and TCD. Recurrence which required revision surgery was only observed in ESD. EAT-10 and RSI scores significantly improved and RSI scores normalized post-operatively for all approaches in short-term (< 1 year) follow-up. MTORD is a safe and effective option for complete Zenker's diverticulectomy. Complication rates are low. To date, no patient has required reoperation, although more cases and longer term follow-up are needed for more complete comparison to ESD and traditional open excision.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30877422
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05374-z
pii: 10.1007/s00405-019-05374-z
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1423-1429Références
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):129-33
pubmed: 12370775
Head Neck. 2003 Aug;25(8):681-94
pubmed: 12884352
Am J Med. 2003 Aug 18;115 Suppl 3A:169S-171S
pubmed: 12928096
AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1960 May;71:744-52
pubmed: 13817253
Laryngoscope. 2004 Mar;114(3):519-27
pubmed: 15091228
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Dec;12(12):2057-64; discussion 2064-5
pubmed: 18810559
Laryngoscope. 2010 Jan;120(1):17-22
pubmed: 19877194
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010 Feb;30(1):1-4
pubmed: 20559466
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010 Nov;119(11):736-41
pubmed: 21140632
Laryngoscope. 2011 Oct;121(10):2090-4
pubmed: 21898438
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Mar;146(3):426-9
pubmed: 22166966
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013 Apr;122(4):247-53
pubmed: 23697322
Dig Surg. 2013;30(3):207-18
pubmed: 23838812
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Dec;46(6):1043-57
pubmed: 24262958
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Dec;46(6):1101-11
pubmed: 24262962
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jan;272(1):167-73
pubmed: 24604681
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct;151(4):646-51
pubmed: 24990870
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3095-107
pubmed: 25194579
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):183-8
pubmed: 25567345
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb 16;7(2):87-93
pubmed: 25685264
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Nov;29(8):1170-1171
pubmed: 26415863
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Apr;142(4):401-3
pubmed: 26914440
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994 Mar;103(3):178-85
pubmed: 8122833
Acta Otolaryngol. 1996 May;116(3):351-60
pubmed: 8790732