Comprehensive vaping bans are associated with lower odds of initiation into electronic nicotine delivery systems use among young people.
ENDS
e-cigarettes
initiation
policy
vaping bans
youth
Journal
Addiction (Abingdon, England)
ISSN: 1360-0443
Titre abrégé: Addiction
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9304118
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Feb 2024
27 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
09
08
2023
accepted:
06
01
2024
medline:
28
2
2024
pubmed:
28
2
2024
entrez:
27
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
E-cigarette and other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use has grown considerably over the past decade, with notable increases among young people. US state policy contexts for ENDS and tobacco may shape initiation into ENDS use among adolescents as they age into early adulthood. We aimed to determine whether state-level comprehensive vaping ban policies reduce the odds of youth initiation into ENDS use, net of additional state-level ENDS and tobacco policies, as well as the youth's cigarette smoking status. Longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study were merged with a state-year database on tobacco and ENDS policies. Multivariable discrete-time event history models of ENDS initiation were estimated. United States. Twenty thousand twelve youth assessed over six waves from 2013 to 2019 (n = 53 974 observations). We examined comprehensive indoor vaping bans (i.e. 100% vape-free workplaces, restaurants and bars) as a key factor in initiation into ENDS use (i.e. first instance of vaping) from age 13 to 22. Among young people, residing in a state with a comprehensive vaping ban was associated with 18% lower odds of ENDS initiation (odds ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval =[0.71, 0.94]), even after controlling for other state ENDS and tobacco policies, the youth's cigarette smoking and socio-demographic background and state-level covariates. In the United States, state-level vaping bans (i.e. 100% vape-free workplaces, restaurants and bars) are associated with reduced odds of youth initiation into electronic nicotine delivery systems use.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
E-cigarette and other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use has grown considerably over the past decade, with notable increases among young people. US state policy contexts for ENDS and tobacco may shape initiation into ENDS use among adolescents as they age into early adulthood. We aimed to determine whether state-level comprehensive vaping ban policies reduce the odds of youth initiation into ENDS use, net of additional state-level ENDS and tobacco policies, as well as the youth's cigarette smoking status.
DESIGN
METHODS
Longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study were merged with a state-year database on tobacco and ENDS policies. Multivariable discrete-time event history models of ENDS initiation were estimated.
SETTING
METHODS
United States.
PARTICIPANTS
METHODS
Twenty thousand twelve youth assessed over six waves from 2013 to 2019 (n = 53 974 observations).
MEASUREMENT
METHODS
We examined comprehensive indoor vaping bans (i.e. 100% vape-free workplaces, restaurants and bars) as a key factor in initiation into ENDS use (i.e. first instance of vaping) from age 13 to 22.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Among young people, residing in a state with a comprehensive vaping ban was associated with 18% lower odds of ENDS initiation (odds ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval =[0.71, 0.94]), even after controlling for other state ENDS and tobacco policies, the youth's cigarette smoking and socio-demographic background and state-level covariates.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In the United States, state-level vaping bans (i.e. 100% vape-free workplaces, restaurants and bars) are associated with reduced odds of youth initiation into electronic nicotine delivery systems use.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01DA054234
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.
Références
Glantz SA, Bareham DW. E-cigarettes: use, effects on smoking, risks, and policy implications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39(1):215-235. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013757
Cullen KA, Gentzke AS, Sawdey MD, Chang JT, Anic GM, Wang TW, et al. E-cigarette use among youth in the United States, 2019. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2095-2103. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.18387
Kasza KA, Edwards KC, Tang Z, Stanton CA, Sharma E, Halenar MJ, et al. Correlates of tobacco product initiation among youth and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH study waves 1-3 (2013-2016). Tob Control. 2020;29(Suppl 3):s191-s202. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055671
Everett SA, Warren CW, Sharp D, Kann L, Husten CG, Crossett LS. Initiation of cigarette smoking and subsequent smoking behavior among U.S. high school students. PrevMed. 1999 Nov 1;29(5):327-333. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0560
Barrington-Trimis JL, Urman R, Berhane K, Unger JB, Cruz TB, Pentz MA, et al. E-cigarettes and future cigarette use. Pediatrics. 2016 Jul 1;138(1):e20160379. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0379
Primack BA, Soneji S, Stoolmiller M, Fine MJ, Sargent JD. Progression to traditional cigarette smoking after electronic cigarette use among US adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Nov 1;169(11):1018-1023. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1742
Staff J, Kelly BC, Maggs JL, Vuolo M. Adolescent electronic cigarette use and tobacco smoking in the Millennium Cohort Study. Addiction. 2022;117(2):484-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15645
Jayakumar N, O'Connor S, Diemert L, Schwartz R. Predictors of e-cigarette initiation: findings from the youth and young adult panel study. Tob Use Insights. 2020;13:1179173X20977486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X20977486
Loukas A, Paddock EM, Li X, Harrell MB, Pasch KE, Perry CL. Electronic nicotine delivery systems marketing and initiation among youth and young adults. Pediatrics. 2019;144(3):e20183601. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3601
Evans-Polce R, Veliz P, Boyd CJ, McCabe VV, McCabe SE. Trends in e-cigarette, cigarette, cigar, and smokeless tobacco use among US adolescent cohorts, 2014-2018. Am J Public Health. 2020 Feb;110(2):163-165. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305421
Pérez A, Bluestein MA, Kuk AE, Chen B. Age of e-cigarette initiation in USA young adults: findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study (2013-2017). PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12):e0261243. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261243
Titus AR, Kalousova L, Meza R, Levy DT, Thrasher JF, Elliott MR, et al. Smoke-free policies and smoking cessation in the United States, 2003-2015. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep;16(17):3200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173200
Vuolo M, Kadowaki J, Kelly BC. A multilevel test of constrained choices theory: the case of tobacco clean air restrictions. J Health Soc Behav. 2016 Sep;57(3):351-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146516653790
Song AV, Dutra LM, Neilands TB, Glantz SA. Association of smoke-free laws with lower percentages of new and current smokers among adolescents and young adults: an 11-year longitudinal study. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(9):e152285. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2285
Parks MJ, Kingsbury JH, Boyle RG, Choi K. Behavioral change in response to a statewide tobacco tax increase and differences across socioeconomic status. Addict Behav. 2017;73:209-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.019
Mojtabai R, Riehm KE, Cohen JE, Alexander GC, Rutkow L. Clean indoor air laws, cigarette excise taxes, and smoking: results from the current population survey-tobacco use supplement, 2003-2011. Prev Med. 2019 Sep 1;126:105744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.06.002
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Evaluating the effectiveness of smoke-free policies. Handbooks of cancer prevention, tobacco control Lyon, France: IARC; 2009.
Brown T, Platt S, Amos A. Equity impact of interventions and policies to reduce smoking in youth: systematic review. Tob Control. 2014 Nov 1;23(e2):e98-e105. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051451
Cotti C, Courtemanche C, Maclean JC, Nesson E, Pesko MF, Tefft NW. The effects of e-cigarette taxes on e-cigarette prices and tobacco product sales: evidence from retail panel data. J Health Econ. 2022;86:102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102676
Kadowaki J, Vuolo M, Kelly BC. A review of the current geographic distribution of and debate surrounding electronic cigarette clean air regulations in the United States. Health Place. 2015 Jan 1;31:75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.11.003
Wackowski OA, Delnevo CD. Smokers' attitudes and support for e-cigarette policies and regulation in the USA. Tob Control. 2015 Nov 1;24(6):543-546. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051953
Friedman AS, Pesko MF. Young adult responses to taxes on cigarettes and electronic nicotine delivery systems. Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):3121-3128. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16002
Kelly BC, Vuolo M, Frizzell LC, Hernandez EM. Denormalization, smoke-free air policy, and tobacco use among young adults. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug 1;211:70-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.051
Friedman AS, Oliver JF, Busch SH. Adding vaping restrictions to smoke-free air laws: associations with conventional and electronic cigarette use. Addiction. 2021 Aug;116(8):2198-2206. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15434
Cheng KW, Liu F, Pesko MF, Levy DT, Fong GT, Cummings KM. Impact of vaping restrictions in public places on smoking and vaping in the United States-evidence using a difference-in-differences approach. Addiction. 2023 Jan;118(1):160-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16039
Yang M, Russell A, Lin HC. Association between inclusion of E-cigarettes in statewide comprehensive smoke-free indoor air laws and vaping behaviors: results from a longitudinal population study. Subst Use Misuse. 2022 Apr 16;57(5):806-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2022.2046091
Piesse A, Opsomer J, Dohrmann S, DiGaetano R, Morganstein D, Taylor K, et al. Longitudinal uses of the population assessment of tobacco and health study. Tob Reg Sci. 2021 Jan;7(1):3-16. https://doi.org/10.18001/TRS.7.1.1
Cotti C, Nesson E, Pesko MF, Phillips S, Tefft N. Standardising the measurement of e-cigarette taxes in the USA, 2010-2020. Tob Control. 2023;32(e2):e251-e254. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056865
Allison, PD. Event history analysis: regression for longitudinal event data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1984, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984195
Scharfstein DO, Rotnitzky A, Robins JM. Adjusting for nonignorable drop-out using semiparametric nonresponse models. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94(448):1096-1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10473862
Cooper M, Park-Lee E, Ren C, Cornelius M, Jamal A, Cullen KA. Notes from the field: E-cigarette use among middle and high school students-United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(40):1283-1285. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7140a3
Cohen JE, Krishnan-Sarin S, Eissenberg T, Gould TJ, Berman ML, Bhatnagar A, et al. Balancing risks and benefits of e-cigarettes in the real world. Am J Public Health. 2022 Feb;112(2):e1-e2. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306607
Kelly BC, Vuolo M, Orsini MM, Maggs JL, Staff J. Tobacco policy and ENDS policy influences on adolescent vaping across the U.S. states. Am J Prevent Med. 2023;65(6):1026-1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.07.010
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health. E-cigarette use among youth and young adults. A report of the surgeon general Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2016.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2023. Smokefree indoor air laws, including E-cigarettes. https://www.cdc.gov/statesystem/factsheets/ecigarette/EcigSFIA.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2023.