Assessing a cut-off point for the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding using the Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (MBQ): a validation and cultural translation study with Brazilian women.
Journal
Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina
ISSN: 1806-9460
Titre abrégé: Sao Paulo Med J
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 100897261
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
11
09
2022
accepted:
10
04
2023
medline:
14
7
2023
pubmed:
12
7
2023
entrez:
12
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a common condition, and the Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (MBQ) is used for its assessment. To translate, assess the cut-off point for diagnosis, and explore psychometric properties of the MBQ for use in Brazilian Portuguese. Prospective cohort study including 200 women (100 with and 100 without AUB) at a tertiary referral center. MBQ translation involved a pilot-testing phase, instrument adjustment, data collection, and back-translation. Cut-off point was obtained using receiver operating curve analysis. Menstrual patterns, impact on quality of life due to AUB, internal consistency, test-retest, responsiveness, and discriminant validity were assessed. For construct validity, the Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) and World Health Organization Quality of Life - abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF) were applied. Women with AUB were older, had higher body mass indices, and had a worse quality of life during menstruation. Regarding the MBQ's psychometric variables, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was > 0.70 in all analyses, high intraclass correlation coefficient was found in both groups; no ceiling and floor effects were observed, and construct validity was demonstrated (correlation between MBQ score, PBAC score, and clinical menstrual cycle data). No difference between MBQ and PBAC scores were perceived after the test-retest. Significant differences were found between MBQ and PBAC scores before and after treatment. An MBQ score ≥ 24 was associated with a high probability of AUB; accuracy of 98%. The MBQ is a reliable questionnaire for Brazilian women. The cut-off ≥ 24 shows high accuracy to discriminate AUB.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a common condition, and the Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (MBQ) is used for its assessment.
OBJECTIVES
To translate, assess the cut-off point for diagnosis, and explore psychometric properties of the MBQ for use in Brazilian Portuguese.
DESIGN AND SETTING
Prospective cohort study including 200 women (100 with and 100 without AUB) at a tertiary referral center.
METHODS
MBQ translation involved a pilot-testing phase, instrument adjustment, data collection, and back-translation. Cut-off point was obtained using receiver operating curve analysis. Menstrual patterns, impact on quality of life due to AUB, internal consistency, test-retest, responsiveness, and discriminant validity were assessed. For construct validity, the Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) and World Health Organization Quality of Life - abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF) were applied.
RESULTS
Women with AUB were older, had higher body mass indices, and had a worse quality of life during menstruation. Regarding the MBQ's psychometric variables, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was > 0.70 in all analyses, high intraclass correlation coefficient was found in both groups; no ceiling and floor effects were observed, and construct validity was demonstrated (correlation between MBQ score, PBAC score, and clinical menstrual cycle data). No difference between MBQ and PBAC scores were perceived after the test-retest. Significant differences were found between MBQ and PBAC scores before and after treatment. An MBQ score ≥ 24 was associated with a high probability of AUB; accuracy of 98%.
CONCLUSION
The MBQ is a reliable questionnaire for Brazilian women. The cut-off ≥ 24 shows high accuracy to discriminate AUB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37436255
pii: S1516-31802024000100202
doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0539.R2.100423
pmc: PMC10328441
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2022539Références
Fertil Steril. 2002 Jul;78(1):96-101
pubmed: 12095497
PLoS One. 2015 May 12;10(5):e0127050
pubmed: 25965447
Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1715-21.e1-4
pubmed: 24034941
BJOG. 2011 Nov;118(12):1528-31
pubmed: 21790952
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91
pubmed: 11124735
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Apr;40:44-54
pubmed: 27829537
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):681-9
pubmed: 25615842
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1966;45(3):320-51
pubmed: 5922481
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;190(5):1216-23
pubmed: 15167821
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;39(7):358-368
pubmed: 28605821
Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Nov;29(11):2333-46
pubmed: 24233047
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jul;26(7):762-767
pubmed: 28318358
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Dec;26(12):2745-55
pubmed: 21043553
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Feb;94(2):326-335
pubmed: 30711128
F1000Prime Rep. 2015 Mar 03;7:33
pubmed: 25926984
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Aug;97(8):734-9
pubmed: 2400752
Value Health. 2007 May-Jun;10(3):183-94
pubmed: 17532811
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;64(1):96-106
pubmed: 21130355
Qual Life Res. 1995 Feb;4(1):33-40
pubmed: 7711689
Sao Paulo Med J. 2017 Mar-Apr;135(2):107-115
pubmed: 28301630
Rev Saude Publica. 2000 Apr;34(2):178-83
pubmed: 10881154
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):891-896
pubmed: 23635706
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):142
pubmed: 30134884