Association of Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers Versus β-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers With Risk of Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Humans
Aged
United States
/ epidemiology
Heart Failure
/ drug therapy
Calcium Channel Blockers
/ therapeutic use
Diltiazem
/ therapeutic use
Medicare
Stroke Volume
Hospitalization
Atrial Fibrillation
/ complications
Verapamil
/ therapeutic use
Receptors, Adrenergic, beta
/ therapeutic use
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 06 2023
15 06 2023
Historique:
received:
04
01
2023
revised:
13
03
2023
accepted:
10
04
2023
pmc-release:
15
06
2024
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
8
5
2023
entrez:
7
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are interrelated and often coexisting conditions in older adults. Although equally recommended, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (non-DHP CCBs), such as diltiazem and verapamil, are less often used than β blockers. Because recent studies suggested that β-blocker use in both HFpEF and AF may increase the risk for HF, we tested whether non-DHP CCBs were associated with lower HF hospitalization risk than β blockers. We examined fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who were aged ≥66 years, had HFpEF or AF, and newly initiated a β blocker (n = 83,458) or non-DHP CCB (n = 18,924) from 2014 to 2018. The outcomes of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality were analyzed using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression in the full cohort and, separately, in the subset without a recent hospital or skilled nursing discharge. Follow-up was analyzed using 2 frameworks: intention-to-treat and censored-at-drug-switch-or-discontinuation. There was a modestly protective association of non-DHP CCBs for the risk of HF hospitalization. Before drug switch or discontinuation, the use of diltiazem or verapamil was associated with decreased risk of HF hospitalization in the full cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 to 1.00, p = 0.05) and in the subgroup (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.89, p = 0.003). However, the association with all-cause mortality tended to favor β blockers, including in the intention-to-treat analysis (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.25, p <0.001). In conclusion, compared with β blockers, the initiation of diltiazem or verapamil in patients with HFpEF or AF may be associated with fewer HF hospitalization events but also with more all-cause deaths.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37150720
pii: S0002-9149(23)00211-4
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.04.013
pmc: PMC10198951
mid: NIHMS1892826
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Calcium Channel Blockers
0
Diltiazem
EE92BBP03H
Verapamil
CJ0O37KU29
Receptors, Adrenergic, beta
0
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
68-74Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL122744
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
JAMA. 1996 May 15;275(19):1507-13
pubmed: 8622227
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Aug 8;11(8):1413-21
pubmed: 27269611
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 1;39(1):26-35
pubmed: 29040525
Circulation. 2002 Dec 10;106(24):3068-72
pubmed: 12473553
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9
pubmed: 16224307
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00676
pubmed: 33124771
Eur Heart J. 2022 Aug 14;43(31):2971-2980
pubmed: 35764099
Lancet. 2000 Jul 29;356(9227):359-65
pubmed: 10972367
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):1757-1780
pubmed: 35379504
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Nov;7(6):945-52
pubmed: 25296862
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1916598
pubmed: 31800067
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 23;11:753-767
pubmed: 31933524
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Mar 1;45(5):712-9
pubmed: 15734615
Lancet. 2002 Mar 23;359(9311):995-1003
pubmed: 11937178
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 May;2(3):191-8
pubmed: 19808592
N Engl J Med. 1985 Jan 31;312(5):277-83
pubmed: 2857050
Circulation. 2013 Oct 15;128(16):e240-327
pubmed: 23741058
Eur Heart J. 2014 Feb;35(8):517-24
pubmed: 24135831
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;8(3):213-221
pubmed: 36723919
Circulation. 2014 Dec 2;130(23):2071-104
pubmed: 24682348
J Card Fail. 2021 Nov;27(11):1165-1174
pubmed: 33971289
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2023 Feb 25;17:200182
pubmed: 36911071
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498
pubmed: 32860505
JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2497-2508
pubmed: 33351042
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Nov 23;78(21):2042-2056
pubmed: 34794685
Circulation. 2011 Jan 25;123(3):327-34
pubmed: 21263005
Clin Cardiol. 2001 Jan;24(1):73-9
pubmed: 11195610
Circulation. 2018 Aug 28;138(9):861-870
pubmed: 29792299
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Aug;12(8):e006213
pubmed: 31525068