Progression of atypical parkinsonian syndromes: PROSPECT-M-UK study implications for clinical trials.
clinical trials
corticobasal syndrome
multiple system atrophy
progressive supranuclear palsy
sample size
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2023
01 08 2023
Historique:
received:
24
11
2022
revised:
11
02
2023
accepted:
21
02
2023
medline:
3
8
2023
pubmed:
29
3
2023
entrez:
28
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The advent of clinical trials of disease-modifying agents for neurodegenerative disease highlights the need for evidence-based end point selection. Here we report the longitudinal PROSPECT-M-UK study of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome (CBS), multiple system atrophy (MSA) and related disorders, to compare candidate clinical trial end points. In this multicentre UK study, participants were assessed with serial questionnaires, motor examination, neuropsychiatric and MRI assessments at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Participants were classified by diagnosis at baseline and study end, into Richardson syndrome, PSP-subcortical (PSP-parkinsonism and progressive gait freezing subtypes), PSP-cortical (PSP-frontal, PSP-speech and language and PSP-CBS subtypes), MSA-parkinsonism, MSA-cerebellar, CBS with and without evidence of Alzheimer's disease pathology and indeterminate syndromes. We calculated annual rate of change, with linear mixed modelling and sample sizes for clinical trials of disease-modifying agents, according to group and assessment type. Two hundred forty-three people were recruited [117 PSP, 68 CBS, 42 MSA and 16 indeterminate; 138 (56.8%) male; age at recruitment 68.7 ± 8.61 years]. One hundred and fifty-nine completed the 6-month assessment (82 PSP, 27 CBS, 40 MSA and 10 indeterminate) and 153 completed the 12-month assessment (80 PSP, 29 CBS, 35 MSA and nine indeterminate). Questionnaire, motor examination, neuropsychiatric and neuroimaging measures declined in all groups, with differences in longitudinal change between groups. Neuroimaging metrics would enable lower sample sizes to achieve equivalent power for clinical trials than cognitive and functional measures, often achieving N < 100 required for 1-year two-arm trials (with 80% power to detect 50% slowing). However, optimal outcome measures were disease-specific. In conclusion, phenotypic variance within PSP, CBS and MSA is a major challenge to clinical trial design. Our findings provide an evidence base for selection of clinical trial end points, from potential functional, cognitive, clinical or neuroimaging measures of disease progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36975168
pii: 7091433
doi: 10.1093/brain/awad105
pmc: PMC10393398
mid: EMS173240
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3232-3242Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M008525/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/Y008219/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 220258
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T046015/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 103838
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
Références
Brain. 2007 Jun;130(Pt 6):1552-65
pubmed: 17405767
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2022 Feb;95:59-64
pubmed: 35032742
Neurology. 2013 Jan 29;80(5):496-503
pubmed: 23359374
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Mar;12(3):264-74
pubmed: 23391524
Neurology. 1988 Jul;38(7):1031-4
pubmed: 3386818
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;85(8):925-9
pubmed: 24521567
Mov Disord. 2008 Nov 15;23(15):2129-70
pubmed: 19025984
Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 22;12:637176
pubmed: 33967937
Nat Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):1451-1457
pubmed: 34385707
Mov Disord. 2017 Jun;32(6):853-864
pubmed: 28467028
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2020 Jul 19;7(6):664-671
pubmed: 32775512
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):549-558
pubmed: 31122495
Ann Neurol. 2011 Aug;70(2):327-40
pubmed: 21823158
Brain. 2020 May 1;143(5):1555-1571
pubmed: 32438414
Neurology. 2008 Aug 26;71(9):670-6
pubmed: 18725592
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2020 May;74:67-73
pubmed: 32536421
Brain. 2001 Jul;124(Pt 7):1438-49
pubmed: 11408338
Mov Disord. 2020 Dec;35(12):2301-2313
pubmed: 32914550
Mov Disord. 2014 Apr;29(4):470-8
pubmed: 24532007
Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 12;11:603161
pubmed: 33281738
Clin Auton Res. 2021 Apr;31(2):157-164
pubmed: 33554315
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 May;19(5):1752-1763
pubmed: 36223793
Mov Disord. 2004 Dec;19(12):1391-402
pubmed: 15452868
Ann Neurol. 2020 May;87(5):751-762
pubmed: 32105364
Brain Commun. 2021 Sep 02;3(3):fcab206
pubmed: 34541533
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019 Sep;66:87-93
pubmed: 31307919
Neurobiol Dis. 2020 Jun;139:104813
pubmed: 32087288
Neurology. 2016 Nov 8;87(19):2016-2025
pubmed: 27742814
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jul;14(7):710-9
pubmed: 26025783
Lancet. 1999 Nov 20;354(9192):1771-5
pubmed: 10577638
J Neurol. 2013 Jan;260(1):228-36
pubmed: 22865238
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;93(2):158-168
pubmed: 34353857
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 May;88(5):402-411
pubmed: 28250027
Neurol Sci. 2001 Jun;22(3):247-51
pubmed: 11731878
Brain. 2009 Jan;132(Pt 1):156-71
pubmed: 19029129
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jul;13(7):676-85
pubmed: 24873720
Brain. 2019 Feb 1;142(2):443-459
pubmed: 30698757
Nat Med. 2022 Dec;28(12):2547-2554
pubmed: 36424467
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Mar;20(3):182-192
pubmed: 33609476
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Mar 1;77(3):377-387
pubmed: 31860007
Neurology. 2016 May 3;86(18):1736-43
pubmed: 27037234
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013 Nov;19(11):980-5
pubmed: 23968651
Mov Disord. 2016 May;31(5):742-7
pubmed: 26948290
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021 Mar;84:77-81
pubmed: 33581485
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Aug;140(2):99-119
pubmed: 32383020