Recommendations for Ultrasound Guidance for Diagnostic Nerve Blocks for Spasticity. What Are the Benefits?


Journal

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1532-821X
Titre abrégé: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985158R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2023
Historique:
received: 25 07 2022
revised: 13 01 2023
accepted: 16 01 2023
medline: 5 9 2023
pubmed: 6 2 2023
entrez: 5 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The diagnostic nerve block (DNB) for spasticity is the percutaneous application of an anesthetic to an individual peripheral nerve trunk (mixed motor sensory nerve), nerve branch to a muscle or an intramuscular branch. The DNB causes a temporary paralysis to assess the contribution of muscle(s) on the spastic pattern and may unmask a fully or partially increased joint range of motion. The anesthetic literature supports the use of ultrasound (US) guidance to improve nerve blocks for sensory targets. This communication summarizes the potential advantages that support the use of US to improve DNB technique. Nerves are much smaller than muscle targets and have various known innervation patterns. US allows for rapid localization of the target before injection, particularly in complex anatomy patterns. The nerve trunks are typically found adjacent to or encapsulating blood vessels, which can be quickly identified with or without color Doppler, allowing the clinician to scan from the vessels to the target and avoid intravascular injection. Lower stimulation levels can be used as the targeted muscle(s) can be seen stimulating rather than only on the surface. A shorter needle insertion time and lower stimulation levels should cause less discomfort to the patient. Smaller volumes of anesthetic may be used as the fluid is seen reaching its target and cessation of stimulation is observed. Further study is needed to identify evidence supporting US utilization with electrical stimulation in DNBs for spasticity management, as US use during nerve blocks for perineurial anesthesia has demonstrated improved patient safety and procedural efficiency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36740138
pii: S0003-9993(23)00086-2
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.01.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1539-1548

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Paul Winston (P)

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Canada; Canadian Advances in Neuro-Orthopedics for Spasticity Consortium, Kingston, Canada. Electronic address: paul.winston@islandhealth.ca.

Rajiv Reebye (R)

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Canada; Canadian Advances in Neuro-Orthopedics for Spasticity Consortium, Kingston, Canada.

Alessandro Picelli (A)

Canadian Advances in Neuro-Orthopedics for Spasticity Consortium, Kingston, Canada; Section of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Romain David (R)

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Poitiers University, Poitiers, France.

Eve Boissonnault (E)

Canadian Advances in Neuro-Orthopedics for Spasticity Consortium, Kingston, Canada; Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH