Validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-CLUTS) for Spanish-speaking children.
Paedriatic
Questionnaire validation
Urinary incontinence
Urinary tract
Urination disorders
Journal
European journal of pediatrics
ISSN: 1432-1076
Titre abrégé: Eur J Pediatr
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7603873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
21
09
2022
accepted:
13
01
2023
revised:
12
12
2022
pubmed:
20
1
2023
medline:
22
3
2023
entrez:
19
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-CLUTS) is a 12-item self-administered tool to screen lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in children. The aim of this study is to translate and validate the ICIQ-CLUTS into Spanish (ICIQ-CLUTS-Sp) and to study its psychometric properties. The cross-cultural adaptation of the ICIQ-CLUTS was performed following international recommendations. The psychometric analysis of the ICIQ-CLUTS-Sp was carried out to determine the reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy in a sample of 155 children and parents who completed the Spanish version ICIQ-CLUTS. The reliability indicators for the ICIQ-CLUTS-Sp were excellent (Cronbach's alpha was > 0.8 and ICC > 0.9 both for children's and parents' versions). There was a high Pearson r > 0.6 and a high agreement level between children's and parents' answers (ICC > 0.6), except in 4 items. For parents, the standard error of measurement (SEm) was 0.41, and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was 1.14 points. In children, these results were 0.42 and 1.16 points, respectively. Cut-off points greater than 15 points in the parent version or 16 points in the children version have the highest sensitivity and specificity for detecting LUTS. Conclusion: The Spanish version of the ICIQ-CLUTS questionnaire is a valid, reliable, and diagnostically accurate instrument to identify cases of children with LUTS. Therefore, it can be used to screen for lower urinary tract symptoms in Spanish speaking children and/or parents, as well as to monitor the effects of interventions. What is Known: • Lower urinary tract symptoms in children should be assessed multimodally using minimally invasive diagnostic procedures. One way to do this is to use the questionnaire to differentiate these cases in paediatric patients. • A cross-cultural adaptation of the ICIQ-CLUTS questionnaire to Spanish has not yet been done. What is New: • Based on a comprehensive validation methodology, this study highlights that the ICIQ-CLUTSSp questionnaire has good psychometric properties.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36656373
doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04823-6
pii: 10.1007/s00431-023-04823-6
pmc: PMC10023609
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1361-1369Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Austin PF, Bauer SB, Bower W et al (2016) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the standardization committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 35(4):471–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22751
doi: 10.1002/nau.22751
pubmed: 25772695
Veloso LA, Mello MJG de, Ribeiro Neto JPM, Barbosa LNF, Silva EJ da CE (2016) Quality of life, cognitive level and school performance in children with functional lower urinary tract dysfunction. J Bras Nefrol 38(2):234–44. https://doi.org/10.5935/0101-2800.20160033
Dourado ER, Abreu GE, Santana JC et al (2019) Emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents with lower urinary tract dysfunction: a population-based study. J Pediatr Urol 15(4):376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.12.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.12.003
Nevéus T, Von GA, Hoebeke P et al (2006) The Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: report from the standardisation committee of the International Children’ s Continence Society. J Urol 176:314–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00305-3
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00305-3
Chase J, Bower W, Gibb S (2018) Diagnostic scores, questionnaires, quality of life, and outcome measures in pediatric continence : a review of available tools from the International Children’ s Continence Society. J Pediatr Urol 14(2):98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.003
pubmed: 29429829
Tekgul S, Stein R, Bogaert G, Undre S, Nijman RJM, Quaedackers J (2020) EAU-ESPU guidelines recommendations for daytime lower urinary tract conditions in children. Eur J Pediatr 179(7):1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03681-w
doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03681-w
pubmed: 32472266
da Silva Filho J, Ramos Vieira Santos I, Valença M, Mendes Morato J, Ferreira Dos Santos Filho S, Lessa de Andrade A (2020) Assessment instruments for lower urinary tract dysfunction in children: symptoms. J Pediatr Urol 16(5):636–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.031
De Gennaro M, Niero M, Capitanucci ML et al (2010) Validity of the International Consultation On Incontinence Questionnaire-pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: a screening questionnaire for children. J Urol 184:1662–1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.075
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.075
pubmed: 20728171
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL et al (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19(4):539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
pubmed: 20169472
pmcid: 2852520
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2020) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3186–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Goknar N, Oktem F, Demir AD, Vehapoglu A (2016) Silay MS Comparison of Two validated voiding questionnaires and clinical impression in children with lower urinary tract symptoms: ICIQ-CLUTS Versus Akbal Survey. Urology 94:214–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.05.011
Loong TW (2003) Understanding sensitivity and specificity with the right side of the brain. BMJ 327(7417):716–719. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7417.716
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.716
pubmed: 14512479
pmcid: 200804
Stratford PW (2004) Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Canada 56:27–30
doi: 10.2310/6640.2004.15377
Sheffler LC, Hanley C, Bagley A, Molitor F, James MA (2009) Comparison of self-reports and parent proxy-reports of function and quality of life of children with below-the-elbow deficiency. J Bone Jt Surg-American 91A(12):2852–2859
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01108
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
pubmed: 27330520
pmcid: 4913118
Prieto L, Lamarca R, Casado A, Alonso J (1997) The evaluation of agreement on continuous variables by the intraclass correlation coefficient. J Epidemiol Community Heal 51(5):579–581. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.51.5.579-a
doi: 10.1136/jech.51.5.579-a
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
pubmed: 2868172
Costello AB, Osborne JW (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the Most from your analysis. Pr Assess Res Eval 10(7):1–9
Williams B, Brown T, Onsman A (2010) Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices. J Public Heal Care Epidemiol 8(3):1–13
Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ (2008) User´S Guides To Medical Literature. Vol second
Parikh R, Parikh S, Arun E, Thomas R (2009) Likelihood ratios: clinical application in day-to-day practice. Indian J Ophthalmol 57(3):217–221. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.49397
doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.49397
pubmed: 19384017
pmcid: 2683447
Caraguel CG, Vanderstichel R (2013) The two-step Fagan’s nomogram: ad hoc interpretation of a diagnostic test result without calculation. Evid Based Med 18(4):125–128. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101243
doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101243
pubmed: 23468201
Lie A, Gjerstad AC, Fossum V et al (2020) Lower urinary tract dysfunction in children - a practical approach. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 140(2). https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.18.0565
Lopes M, Ferraro A, Dória Filho U, Kuckzinski E, Koch VH (2011) Quality of life of pediatric patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction and their caregivers. Pediatr Nephrol 26(4):571–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-010-1744-2
doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1744-2
pubmed: 21222002
Chen M, Jones CM, Bauer HE (2022) Barriers and Opportunities for patient-reported outcome implementation: a national pediatrician survey in the United States. Child 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/children9020185
Copeland JM, Taylor WJ, Dean SG (2008) Factors influencing the use of outcome measures for patients with low back pain: a survey of New Zealand physical therapists. Phys Ther 88(12):1492–1505. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080083
doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080083
pubmed: 18849478
Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Angst J (2017) The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies. J Clin Epidemiol 82:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.016
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.016
pubmed: 27986610
Silay MS, Goknar N, Kilincaslan H et al (2013) Who should we trust in screening for lower urinary tract dysfunction in children: the parents or the child?. Urology 82(2):437–441
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.021
pubmed: 23676358