Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2022
Historique:
entrez: 29 12 2022
pubmed: 30 12 2022
medline: 3 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To explore whether the minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIE) or hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy (HMIE) are associated with better nutritional status and less weight loss 1 year after surgery, compared with open oesophagectomy (OE). Prospective cohort study. All patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer in Sweden during 2013-2018. A total of 424 patients alive at 1 year after surgery were eligible, and 281 completed the 1-year assessment. Of these, 239 had complete clinical data and were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was nutritional status at 1 year after surgery, assessed using the abbreviated Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment questionnaire. The secondary outcomes included postoperative weight loss at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Of the included patients, 78 underwent MIE, 74 HMIE while 87 patients underwent OE. The MIE group had the highest prevalence of malnutrition (42% vs 22% after HMIE vs 25% after OE), reduced food intake (63% vs 45% after HMIE vs 39% after OE), symptoms reducing food intake (60% vs 45% after HMIE vs 60% after OE) and abnormal activities/function (45% vs 32% after HMIE vs 43% after OE). After adjustment for confounders, MIE was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of reduced food intake 1 year after surgery (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.47 to 5.61), compared with OE. Other outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the groups. No statistically significant associations were observed between surgical techniques and weight loss up to 1 year after surgery. MIE was statistically significantly associated with reduced food intake 1 year after surgery. However, no differences were observed in weight loss between the surgical techniques. Further studies on nutritional impact of surgical techniques in oesophageal cancer are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36581984
pii: bmjopen-2021-058763
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058763
pmc: PMC9438117
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e058763

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jul;11(7):663-672
pubmed: 28454509
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;103(1):267-273
pubmed: 27677565
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;25(1):326-332
pubmed: 29094248
Acta Oncol. 2020 Jun;59(6):613-619
pubmed: 32193960
Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;36(3):623-650
pubmed: 28385477
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002 Aug;56(8):779-85
pubmed: 12122555
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):152-162
pubmed: 30625052
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):1986-93
pubmed: 26037024
Br J Surg. 2017 Aug;104(9):1131-1140
pubmed: 28632926
Clin Nutr. 2016 Oct;35(5):987-94
pubmed: 26411750
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1097-103
pubmed: 26652140
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S817-S825
pubmed: 28815079
Nutr Cancer. 2013;65(2):234-9
pubmed: 23441610
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Nov;29(8):1064-1070
pubmed: 26401634
Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2383-2396
pubmed: 28648400
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Nov;94(5):1652-8
pubmed: 23098941
Support Care Cancer. 2010 May;18 Suppl 2:S41-50
pubmed: 19551411
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):88-94
pubmed: 28857809
World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2844-52
pubmed: 20842361
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec 8;14(1):304
pubmed: 27927246
Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):292-8
pubmed: 20622666
Clin Nutr. 1999 Apr;18(2):71-7
pubmed: 10459083
Br J Surg. 2012 Nov;99(11):1547-53
pubmed: 23027071
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar;13(3):185-98
pubmed: 26573424
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Jan 1;31(1):1-8
pubmed: 29025081
Br J Surg. 2008 May;95(5):592-601
pubmed: 18300270
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;43(8):1559-1565
pubmed: 28655483
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96
pubmed: 19638912
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Apr 1;32(4):
pubmed: 30351390

Auteurs

Joonas H Kauppila (JH)

Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden joonas.kauppila@ki.se.
Department of Surgery, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

Helen Rosenlund (H)

Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Orthopaedics, Danderyds Sjukhus AB, Stockholm, Sweden.

Fredrik Klevebro (F)

Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Asif Johar (A)

Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Poorna Anandavadivelan (P)

Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Kalle Mälberg (K)

Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Pernilla Lagergren (P)

Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH