Long-term oncological outcomes of endoscopic full-thickness resection after previous incomplete resection of low-risk T1 CRC (LOCAL-study): study protocol of a national prospective cohort study.
Colorectal cancer
Endoscopic full-thickness resection
Minimal invasive local treatment options
T1 colorectal cancer
Journal
BMC gastroenterology
ISSN: 1471-230X
Titre abrégé: BMC Gastroenterol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968547
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Dec 2022
13 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
25
08
2022
accepted:
21
11
2022
entrez:
13
12
2022
pubmed:
14
12
2022
medline:
16
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) without histological high-risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) can potentially be cured by endoscopic resection, which is associated with significantly lower morbidity, mortality and costs compared to radical surgery. An important prerequisite for endoscopic resection as definite treatment is the histological confirmation of tumour-free resection margins. Incomplete resection with involved (R1) or indeterminate (Rx) margins is considered a strong risk factor for residual disease and local recurrence. Therefore, international guidelines recommend additional surgery in case of R1/Rx resection, even in absence of high-risk factors for LNM. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) is a relatively new technique that allows transmural resection of colorectal lesions. Local scar excision after prior R1/Rx resection of low-risk T1 CRC could offer an attractive minimal invasive strategy to achieve confirmation about radicality of the previous resection or a second attempt for radical resection of residual luminal cancer. However, oncologic safety has not been established and long-term data are lacking. Besides, surveillance varies widely and requires standardization. In this nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort study we aim to assess feasibility and oncological safety of completion eFTR following incomplete resection of low-risk T1 CRC. The primary endpoint is to assess the 2 and 5 year luminal local tumor recurrence rate. Secondary study endpoints are to assess feasibility, percentage of curative eFTR-resections, presence of scar tissue and/or complete scar excision at histopathology, safety of eFTR compared to surgery, 2 and 5 year nodal and/or distant tumor recurrence rate and 5-year disease-specific and overall-survival rate. Since the implementation of CRC screening programs, the diagnostic rate of T1 CRC is steadily increasing. A significant proportion is not recognized as cancer before endoscopic resection and is therefore resected through conventional techniques primarily reserved for benign polyps. As such, precise histological assessment is often hampered due to cauterization and fragmentation and frequently leads to treatment dilemmas. This first prospective trial will potentially demonstrate the effectiveness and oncological safety of completion eFTR for patients who have undergone a previous incomplete T1 CRC resection. Hereby, substantial surgical overtreatment may be avoided, leading to treatment optimization and organ preservation. Trial registration Nederlands Trial Register, NL 7879, 16 July 2019 ( https://trialregister.nl/trial/7879 ).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) without histological high-risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) can potentially be cured by endoscopic resection, which is associated with significantly lower morbidity, mortality and costs compared to radical surgery. An important prerequisite for endoscopic resection as definite treatment is the histological confirmation of tumour-free resection margins. Incomplete resection with involved (R1) or indeterminate (Rx) margins is considered a strong risk factor for residual disease and local recurrence. Therefore, international guidelines recommend additional surgery in case of R1/Rx resection, even in absence of high-risk factors for LNM. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) is a relatively new technique that allows transmural resection of colorectal lesions. Local scar excision after prior R1/Rx resection of low-risk T1 CRC could offer an attractive minimal invasive strategy to achieve confirmation about radicality of the previous resection or a second attempt for radical resection of residual luminal cancer. However, oncologic safety has not been established and long-term data are lacking. Besides, surveillance varies widely and requires standardization.
METHODS/DESIGN
METHODS
In this nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort study we aim to assess feasibility and oncological safety of completion eFTR following incomplete resection of low-risk T1 CRC. The primary endpoint is to assess the 2 and 5 year luminal local tumor recurrence rate. Secondary study endpoints are to assess feasibility, percentage of curative eFTR-resections, presence of scar tissue and/or complete scar excision at histopathology, safety of eFTR compared to surgery, 2 and 5 year nodal and/or distant tumor recurrence rate and 5-year disease-specific and overall-survival rate.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Since the implementation of CRC screening programs, the diagnostic rate of T1 CRC is steadily increasing. A significant proportion is not recognized as cancer before endoscopic resection and is therefore resected through conventional techniques primarily reserved for benign polyps. As such, precise histological assessment is often hampered due to cauterization and fragmentation and frequently leads to treatment dilemmas. This first prospective trial will potentially demonstrate the effectiveness and oncological safety of completion eFTR for patients who have undergone a previous incomplete T1 CRC resection. Hereby, substantial surgical overtreatment may be avoided, leading to treatment optimization and organ preservation. Trial registration Nederlands Trial Register, NL 7879, 16 July 2019 ( https://trialregister.nl/trial/7879 ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36513968
doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02591-5
pii: 10.1186/s12876-022-02591-5
pmc: PMC9749288
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
516Subventions
Organisme : Maarten van der Weijden foundation
ID : 2022-34
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1383-1391.e5
pubmed: 30031768
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2434-41
pubmed: 25318369
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 May;57(5):1298-303
pubmed: 22370915
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;115(11):1751-1767
pubmed: 33156093
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Apr;6(3):463-470
pubmed: 29774161
Gastroenterology. 2013 Mar;144(3):551-9; quiz e14
pubmed: 23232297
Arch Surg. 2005 Mar;140(3):278-83, discussion 284
pubmed: 15781793
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jul;15(7):788-97
pubmed: 23331927
Gut. 2012 Oct;61(10):1439-46
pubmed: 22156981
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;48(11):1294-301
pubmed: 24073745
Gut. 2020 Jun;69(6):977-980
pubmed: 31822579
Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct;147(4):740-742.e2
pubmed: 25083605
Gut. 2018 Sep;67(9):1745-1746
pubmed: 29055907
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr 1;117(4):647-653
pubmed: 35029166
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):289-299
pubmed: 28664442
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Sep;60(9):2785-92
pubmed: 25586088
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jul;12(7 Online):e31-6
pubmed: 19508533
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1108-14
pubmed: 21944313
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):1-42
pubmed: 31203527
Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):241-247
pubmed: 29112994
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):166-172
pubmed: 32105713
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Oct;21(10):1112-1119
pubmed: 31074574
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Aug;48(8):1588-96
pubmed: 15937622
BJS Open. 2018 Dec 24;3(2):210-217
pubmed: 30957069
Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):270-297
pubmed: 28212588
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Oct;6(10):E1227-E1234
pubmed: 30302380
Endoscopy. 2015 Aug;47(8):719-25
pubmed: 25763833
Gut. 2020 Nov;69(11):2049-2051
pubmed: 31937551
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jul;9(7):590-4
pubmed: 21320641
Ann Surg. 2008 Oct;248(4):675-86
pubmed: 18936581
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;15 Suppl 2:1-38
pubmed: 23848492
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Feb;55(2):122-7
pubmed: 22228153
Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1280-1289
pubmed: 28798042
Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):388-402
pubmed: 24671869
Virchows Arch. 2019 Nov;475(5):665-668
pubmed: 31209636
Endoscopy. 2022 May;54(5):475-485
pubmed: 34488228
JAMA Surg. 2013 Aug;148(8):747-54
pubmed: 23784448
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 May;112(5):785-796
pubmed: 28323275
J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;46(2):203-11
pubmed: 21152938
Endoscopy. 2013 Oct;45(10):827-34
pubmed: 23884793
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011 May;20(3):189-92
pubmed: 21574825