Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is the new Da Vinci single port platform providing any benefit?
Da Vinci SP
Inguinal hernia
Robotic single port
Robotic surgery
Single-incision surgery
TAPP
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
received:
24
06
2022
accepted:
13
10
2022
pubmed:
26
10
2022
medline:
21
3
2023
entrez:
25
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The utilization of the robot for inguinal hernia repairs has increased in the past years. The new Da Vinci Single Port (SP) system provides the benefits of single-incision procedures and might overcome the technical difficulties of previous single-incision techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the SP transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (SP-TAPP) and compare its outcomes to the robotic multiport technique (MP-TAPP). A prospective cohort of patients who underwent a robotic SP-TAPP and MP-TAPP between 2012 and 2022 was analyzed. Primary endpoints were same-day discharge, morbidity, and inguinal recurrence rates. Secondary endpoints included conversion, operative time, port-site incisional hernia, and chronic pain. MP-TAPP and SP-TAPP were performed in 378 (81.3%) and 87 (18.7%) patients, respectively. Demographics were similar between groups. There were no conversions or intraoperative complications. Mean operative (MP-TAPP: 93.2 vs. SP-TAPP: 78.1 min, p = 0.003) and recovery time (MP-TAPP: 160.8 vs SP-TAPP: 112.6 min, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the SP group. Same-day discharge rate was higher (MP-TAPP: 86.5% vs. SP-TAPP: 97.7%, p = 0.001) after SP-TAPP; 30-day morbidity, readmissions, and chronic pain rates were similar between groups. After a mean follow-up of 30.6 months for MP-TAPP and 13.3 months for SP-TAPP, inguinal hernia recurrence and port-site incisional rates were similar between groups. Robotic SP-TAPP is safe and feasible. When compared to MP-TAPP, it showed similar postoperative morbidity, higher same-day discharge rates, and a quicker postoperative recovery. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of the SP platform.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The utilization of the robot for inguinal hernia repairs has increased in the past years. The new Da Vinci Single Port (SP) system provides the benefits of single-incision procedures and might overcome the technical difficulties of previous single-incision techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the SP transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (SP-TAPP) and compare its outcomes to the robotic multiport technique (MP-TAPP).
METHODS
A prospective cohort of patients who underwent a robotic SP-TAPP and MP-TAPP between 2012 and 2022 was analyzed. Primary endpoints were same-day discharge, morbidity, and inguinal recurrence rates. Secondary endpoints included conversion, operative time, port-site incisional hernia, and chronic pain.
RESULTS
MP-TAPP and SP-TAPP were performed in 378 (81.3%) and 87 (18.7%) patients, respectively. Demographics were similar between groups. There were no conversions or intraoperative complications. Mean operative (MP-TAPP: 93.2 vs. SP-TAPP: 78.1 min, p = 0.003) and recovery time (MP-TAPP: 160.8 vs SP-TAPP: 112.6 min, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the SP group. Same-day discharge rate was higher (MP-TAPP: 86.5% vs. SP-TAPP: 97.7%, p = 0.001) after SP-TAPP; 30-day morbidity, readmissions, and chronic pain rates were similar between groups. After a mean follow-up of 30.6 months for MP-TAPP and 13.3 months for SP-TAPP, inguinal hernia recurrence and port-site incisional rates were similar between groups.
CONCLUSION
Robotic SP-TAPP is safe and feasible. When compared to MP-TAPP, it showed similar postoperative morbidity, higher same-day discharge rates, and a quicker postoperative recovery. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of the SP platform.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36282359
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09737-2
pii: 10.1007/s00464-022-09737-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2003-2013Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13(4):343–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7
doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7
pubmed: 19636493
pmcid: 2719730
Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(2):188–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9126-0
doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9126-0
pubmed: 15578250
Cardinali L, Mazzetti CH, Cadenas Febres A, Repullo D, Bruyns J, Dapri G (2018) Prospective randomized study comparing single-incision laparoscopic versus multi-trocar laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair at 2 years. Surg Endosc 32(7):3262–3272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6045-z
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6045-z
pubmed: 29362907
Sajid MS, Khawaja AH, Sayegh M, Baig MK (2016) A systematic review comparing single-incision versus multi-incision laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair with mesh. Int J Surg 29:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.088
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.088
pubmed: 26975426
Chueh KS, Lee HY, Yeh HC et al (2020) Comparison between single-incision and multiple-incision laparoscopic surgery for totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 29(5):293–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1637895
doi: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1637895
pubmed: 31280617
Yussra Y, Sutton PA, Kosai NR et al (2013) Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) inguinal hernia repair—recent clinical experiences of this novel technique. Clin Ter 164(5):425–428. https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2013.1608
doi: 10.7417/CT.2013.1608
pubmed: 24217830
Rajapandian S, Bhushan C, Sabnis SC et al (2018) Single incision multiport versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a matched comparison. J Minim Access Surg 14(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_30_17
doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_30_17
pubmed: 28695883
pmcid: 5749197
Guerron AD, Lee HJ, Yoo J et al (2017) laparoscopic single-site inguinal hernia repair using a self-fixating mesh. JSLS. 21(1):e2016.00103. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00103
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00103
pubmed: 28701857
pmcid: 5506777
Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Micheletto G, Bruni PG, Lombardo F, Perali C, Bonitta G, Bona D (2019) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 23(3):509–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01965-1
doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01965-1
pubmed: 31093778
Waite KE, Herman MA, Doyle PJ (2016) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. J Robot Surg 10(3):239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1
doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1
pubmed: 27112781
Prabhu AS, Carbonell A, Hope W, Warren J, Higgins R, Jacob B, Blatnik J, Haskins I, Alkhatib H, Tastaldi L, Fafaj A, Tu C, Rosen MJ (2020) Robotic inguinal vs transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the RIVAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 155(5):380–387. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.PMID:32186683;PMCID:PMC7081145
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.PMID:32186683;PMCID:PMC7081145
pubmed: 32186683
pmcid: 7081145
Bakker WJ, Roos MM, Kerkman T, Burgmans JPJ (2019) Experience with the PINQ-PHONE telephone questionnaire for detection of recurrences after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 23(4):685–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01909-9
doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01909-9
pubmed: 30778858
Ger R, Monroe K, Duvivier R, Mishrick A (1990) Management of indirect inguinal hernias by laparoscopic closure of the neck of the sac. Am J Surg 159(4):370–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81273-5
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81273-5
pubmed: 2138432
Abdelmoaty WF, Dunst CM, Neighorn C, Swanstrom LL, Hammill CW (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis. Surg Endosc 33(10):3436–3443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9
pubmed: 30535936
Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 23(4):920–921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0318-x
doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0318-x
pubmed: 19172350
Ece I, Yilmaz H, Yormaz S, Sahin M (2017) Clinical outcomes of single incision laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. J Minim Access Surg 13(1):37–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181394
doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181394
pubmed: 27251835
pmcid: 5206837
Kim JH, Lee YS, Kim JJ et al (2013) Single port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty: a comparative study of short-term outcome with conventional laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty. World J Surg 37:746–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1925-9
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1925-9
pubmed: 23358595
Cugura JF, Kirac I, Kulis T, Sremac M, Ledinsky M, Beslin MB (2012) Comparison of single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: initial experience. J Endourol 26(1):63–66. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0352
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0352
pubmed: 21999423
Buckley FP, Vassaur H, Monsivais S et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and traditional three-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy at a single institution. Surg Endosc 28:30–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3145-7
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3145-7
pubmed: 24002914
Sato H, Shimada M, Kurita N, Iwata T, Nishioka M, Morimoto S, Yoshikawa K, Miyatani T, Goto M, Kashihara H, Takasu C (2012) The safety and usefulness of the single incision, transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic technique for inguinal hernia. J Med Invest 59(3–4):235–240. https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.59.235
doi: 10.2152/jmi.59.235
pubmed: 23037193
Perivoliotis K, Tzovaras G, Sarakatsianou C, Baloyiannis I (2019) Current status of single-port versus multi-port approach in laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 23(2):217–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-01876-7
doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-01876-7
pubmed: 30617931
Dobbs RW, Halgrimson WR, Talamini S, Vigneswaran HT, Wilson JO, Crivellaro S (2020) Single-port robotic surgery: the next generation of minimally invasive urology. World J Urol 38(4):897–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02898-1
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02898-1
pubmed: 31463560
Park YM, Kim DH, Kang MS et al (2019) The first human trial of transoral robotic surgery using a single-port robotic system in the treatment of Laryngo-Pharyngeal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 26(13):4472–4480. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07802-0
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07802-0
pubmed: 31502020
Marks JH, Salem JF, Anderson BK, Josse JM, Schoonyoung HP (2020) Single-port robotic left colectomy: first clinical experience using the SP robot (Rsils). Tech Coloproctol 24(1):57–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02129-0
doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02129-0
pubmed: 31832798
Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F, Cubisino A, Bianco FM (2021) Novel surgical approach for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): robotic single port partial gastrectomy. Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101704
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101704
pubmed: 34995973
Cruz CJ, Yang HY, Kang I, Kang CM, Lee WJ (2019) Technical feasibility of da Vinci SP single-port robotic cholecystectomy: a case report. Ann Surg Treat Res 97(4):217–221. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2019.97.4.217
doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.4.217
pubmed: 31620396
pmcid: 6779957
Liu R, Zhao GD, Zhang XP et al (2022) The first case report of single-port robot-assisted pancreatectomy using the da Vinci SP system. Intelligent Surgery 1:32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isurg.2022.01.002
doi: 10.1016/j.isurg.2022.01.002
Lee YS, Kim JH, Hong TH et al (2011) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: initial experience of single institute. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21(3):199–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821e5fac
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821e5fac
pubmed: 21654307
Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, Zhu B, Zhang Z, Du D, Zhao X, Jiang H (2011) Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25(1):234–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1165-0
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1165-0
pubmed: 20552368
Krishna A, Misra MC, Bansal VK et al (2012) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:639–649
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1931-7
pubmed: 21959688
Antoniou SA, Morales-Conde S, Antoniou GA et al (2016) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia 20(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1371-8
doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1371-8
pubmed: 25846740
Weiss HG, Brunner W, Biebl MO et al (2014) Wound complications in 1145 consecutive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic procedures. Ann Surg 259(1):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b7818
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b7818
pubmed: 23426333
Harriott CB, Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F, Sadava EE (2021) Incidence and risk factors for umbilical trocar site hernia after laparoscopic TAPP repair a single high-volume center experience. Surg Endosc 35(9):5167–5172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08007-3
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08007-3
pubmed: 32964307
Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2011) Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic surgery: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 15(2):113–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0757-x
doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0757-x
pubmed: 21152941