The role of adjuvant therapy in pT4N0 laryngectomized patients: Multicentric observational study.
glottis
head and neck neoplasms
laryngeal neoplasms
laryngectomy
radiotherapy
squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck
Journal
Head & neck
ISSN: 1097-0347
Titre abrégé: Head Neck
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8902541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
revised:
20
09
2022
received:
09
08
2022
accepted:
04
10
2022
pubmed:
18
10
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
entrez:
17
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To retrospectively evaluate oncological outcomes in two groups of patients with pT4aN0 glottic SCC treated with total laryngectomy (TL) and neck dissection (ND) who underwent postoperative radiotherapy or exclusive clinical and radiological follow-up. It includes patients with pT4N0 glottic SCC who underwent TL and unilateral or bilateral ND with or without PORT. Divided in two comparison groups: the first group underwent adjuvant RT (TL-PORT); the second group referred to clinical and radiological follow-up (TL). PORT was associated with a better OS while no differences were found in terms of DSS. A better local control is achieved when PORT is administered while no differences in terms of regional and distant control rates were found. Bilateral ND positively impacts on the regional control while the PNI negatively impact the regional control. A tailored PORT protocol might be considered for pT4N0 glottic SCC treated with TL and ND, both considering the ND's extent and presence of PNI.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To retrospectively evaluate oncological outcomes in two groups of patients with pT4aN0 glottic SCC treated with total laryngectomy (TL) and neck dissection (ND) who underwent postoperative radiotherapy or exclusive clinical and radiological follow-up.
METHODS
METHODS
It includes patients with pT4N0 glottic SCC who underwent TL and unilateral or bilateral ND with or without PORT. Divided in two comparison groups: the first group underwent adjuvant RT (TL-PORT); the second group referred to clinical and radiological follow-up (TL).
RESULTS
RESULTS
PORT was associated with a better OS while no differences were found in terms of DSS. A better local control is achieved when PORT is administered while no differences in terms of regional and distant control rates were found. Bilateral ND positively impacts on the regional control while the PNI negatively impact the regional control.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A tailored PORT protocol might be considered for pT4N0 glottic SCC treated with TL and ND, both considering the ND's extent and presence of PNI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36250285
doi: 10.1002/hed.27225
pmc: PMC10092371
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
197-206Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013 Oct;33(5):311-9
pubmed: 24227896
Head Neck. 2012 Jul;34(7):994-1001
pubmed: 21953773
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Feb 1;40(3):529-34
pubmed: 9486600
Cancer Invest. 2021 Oct;39(9):734-740
pubmed: 34232825
Laryngoscope. 2021 Oct;131(10):2262-2268
pubmed: 33755212
N Engl J Med. 1991 Jun 13;324(24):1685-90
pubmed: 2034244
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Feb;9(2):134-42
pubmed: 19148183
Cancer. 2017 Jun 15;123(12):2248-2257
pubmed: 28182267
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Aug;27(4):237-242
pubmed: 31116142
Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E2035-40
pubmed: 26828197
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jul 1;92(3):594-601
pubmed: 26068492
Am J Otolaryngol. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):755-62
pubmed: 26545467
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 11;12(8):
pubmed: 32796540
Oral Oncol. 2014 Aug;50(8):753-8
pubmed: 24909939
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 7;11(10):e0164068
pubmed: 27716797
Acta Otolaryngol. 2016 Jul;136(7):703-10
pubmed: 26924463
Head Neck. 2018 Sep;40(9):1897-1908
pubmed: 29756363
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Mar;272(3):673-9
pubmed: 25432639
N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2091-8
pubmed: 14645636
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Sep;140(9):855-60
pubmed: 25144163
Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(9):3006-3014
pubmed: 32112627
Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Feb;139(2):172-177
pubmed: 30734627
Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Dec;41(6):634-639
pubmed: 26493548
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Jun;124(6):637-40
pubmed: 9639472
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Jun;122(6):644-8
pubmed: 8639297
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 1;69(3):751-60
pubmed: 17560735
Laryngoscope. 2005 Aug;115(8):1402-10
pubmed: 16094113
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May;277(5):1481-1489
pubmed: 32048029
Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Jun;128(6):706-12
pubmed: 18568509
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jan 28;43:4
pubmed: 24472173
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3770-6
pubmed: 18669465
Head Neck. 2016 Aug;38(8):1271-7
pubmed: 27043228
Head Neck. 2016 Sep;38(9):1299-309
pubmed: 27330003
Neoplasma. 2017;64(2):305-310
pubmed: 28052684
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Apr;41 Suppl 1:S56-64
pubmed: 22569051
Head Neck. 2023 Jan;45(1):197-206
pubmed: 36250285
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug;143(8):1605-1612
pubmed: 28396948
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 10;35(11):1162-1170
pubmed: 28029318
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 01;11(3):
pubmed: 30832209