Brentano's psychology and Kazimierz Twardowski School: implications for the empirical study of psychological phenomena today.
Early European psychology
Intentionality
Psychology of acts
Reductionism
Replication crisis
The social dimension of mental phenomena
Journal
Psychological research
ISSN: 1430-2772
Titre abrégé: Psychol Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0435062
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
04
05
2022
accepted:
19
09
2022
medline:
31
5
2023
pubmed:
3
10
2022
entrez:
2
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The article presents the most important and almost forgotten theses of Franz Brentano's empirical psychology, which have significance for conceptualization and the method of psychological research. The psychology programme, introduced as early as 1874, remains on the fringes of mainstream empirical psychology, but it was the starting point for Kazimierz Twardowski and his students. The continuation and development of Brentano's thought in the twentieth century can significantly enrich and broaden psychology's theoretical and empirical perspective. This applies primarily to reductionism and the social dimension of mental phenomena.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36183282
doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01744-1
pii: 10.1007/s00426-022-01744-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1665-1681Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Ajdukiewicz, K. (1931/2006). O znaczeniu wyrażeń. In K. Ajdukiewicz (Ed.), Język i poznanie. Wybór pism z lat 1920–1939 [Language and Cognition. Selected Works 1920–1939]. PWN.
Ajdukiewicz, K. (1934a). Das Weltbild und Begriffsapparatur [The image of the world and the concept-system]. Erkenntnis, 4, 259–287.
doi: 10.1007/BF01793493
Ajdukiewicz, K. (1934b). Sprache und Sinn [Language and meaning]. Erkenntnis, 4, 100–138.
doi: 10.1007/BF01793486
Amrhein V., Trafimow D., Greenland S. (2019). Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics: There is no replication crisis if we don’t expect replication. The American Statistician, 73/1, Statistical Inference in the 21st Century, 262–270.
Bem, D. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 407–425.
pubmed: 21280961
doi: 10.1037/a0021524
Betti, A. (2017). Brentano and the Lvov-Warsaw School. In U. Kriegel (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Franz Brentano and the Brentano School (pp. 334–340). Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy.
Bęben, D., & Ples-Bęben, M. (2013). Polska fenomenologia przedwojenna. Antologia Tekstów. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Blaustein, L. (1928). Husserlowska nauka o akcie, treści i przedmiocie przedstawienia [Husserl's Theory of Act, Content and Object of Presentation]. Towarzystwo Naukowe we Lwowie.
Błachowski, S. (1913). Studien Über den Binnenkontrast. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Phisiologie der Sinnesorgane, 43.
Bobryk J. (1987). Locus umysłu. Ossolineum.
Bobryk, J. (2011). Redukcjonizm, psychologia, semiotyka. Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne.
Bobryk, J. (2014). The relevance of concepts in traditional Polish psychology. Z Historie Psychologie, LVIII(3), 302–310.
Bobryk J. (2016) (Ed.). Language, values, actions. The Lvov-Warsaw school and selected problems of modern psychology, semiotics and philosophy. Instytut Psychologii PAN.
Brandl, J., & Woleński, J. (1999). Kazimierz Twardowski. On actions, products and other topics in philosophy. Rodopi.
doi: 10.1163/9789004457676
Brentano, F. (1874/1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Humanities Press.
Brentano, F. (1982). Deskriptive Psychologie. Meiner.
Brożek, A. Chybińska, J. Jadacki, & J. Woleński (Eds.) (2015). Tradition of the Lvov-Warsaw School Ideas and continuations. Brill, USA.
Brożek, A. (2017). Opis analityczny jako metoda analityczna. Filozofia Nauki, XXV, 2, 57–87.
Brożek, A. (2020). Analiza i konstrukcja. O metodach badania pojęć w Szkole Lwowsko-Warszawskiej. Copernicus Center Press.
Brożek, A. (2021). Carnap and the members of the Lvov-Warsaw School. Carnap’s Warsaw Lectures (1930) in the Polish context. In C. Damböck & G. Wolters (Eds.), Der junge Carnap in historischem Kontext: 1918–1935 (pp. 205–221). Springer.
Campbell, N. R. (1928). An account of the principles of theory and experiment. Longmans, Green.
Cavallin, J. (1997). Content and object—Husserl, Twardowski and psychologism. Kluwer.
Chrudzimski, A. (1999). Die Theorie der Intentionalität Franz Brentanos. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 57, 45–66.
Chrudzimski, A. (2005). Teoria przedmiotów intencjonalnych a teoria przysłówkowa. Analiza i Egzystencja, 1, 117–130.
Chrudzimski, A., & Łukasiewicz, D. (2006). Actions, products, and things: Brentano and Polish philosophy. USA: DeGruyter.
doi: 10.1515/9783110325706
Chrudzimski, A. (2013). Varietes of intentional objects. Semiotica, 194, 189–206.
Citlak, A. (2016). The Lvov-Warsaw School—the forgotten tradition of historical psychology. History of Psychology, 19(2), 105–124.
pubmed: 27100926
doi: 10.1037/hop0000029
Citlak, A. (2019). The problem of mind and mental acts in the perspective of psychology in the Lvov-Warsaw School. Philosophical Psychology, 32(7), 1049–1077.
doi: 10.1080/09515089.2019.1647410
Citlak, A. (2021). Psychology of religion in the theories and research of the Lvov-Warsaw School (basic achievements and developments). Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 43(1), 95–116.
doi: 10.1177/0084672421990754
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.
doi: 10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Reflections on embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coltheart, M. (2006). What has Functional Neuroimaging told us about the Mind (so far)? Cortex, 42(3), 323–331.
pubmed: 16771037
doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70358-7
Cowley, S. J., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (Eds.). (2013). Cognition beyond the brain. Computation, interactivity and human artifice. Springer.
Czeżowski, T. (1958). O metodzie opisu analitycznego. In T. Czeżowski (Ed.), Odczyty filozoficzne (pp. 197–207). Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu.
Dennett, D. (2007). Heterophenomenology reconsidered. Phneomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(9–10), 19–30.
Dilthey, W. (1990). Ideen uber eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie. Gesammelte Schriften V (pp. 139–240). Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
Farrer, Ch., & Chr, F. (2002). Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action. The neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage, 15, 596–603.
pubmed: 11848702
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1009
Fechner, G. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik [Elements of psychophysics]. Breitkopf & Hartel.
Ferguson, A., Meyers, C. S., & Bartlett, R. J. (1940). Quantitative estimates of sensory events. The advancement of science. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science., 2, 331–349.
Fisette, D., & Fréchette, G. (Eds.). (2013) Themes from Brentano. Rodopi.
Francis, G. (2016). Implications of “too good to be true” for replication, theoretical claims, and experimental design: An example using prominent studies of racial bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1382.
pubmed: 27713708
pmcid: 5031767
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01382
Gallagher, Sh. (2003). Phenomenology and experimental design. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10), 85–99.
Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2012). Phenomenological mind. Routledge.
Garrido, A., & Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2018). The Lvov-Warsaw school. Past and present, Birkhäuser.
Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: a modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Głombik, C. (2005). Die Polen und die Göttinger phänomenologische Bewegung. Husserl Studies, 21, 1–15.
doi: 10.1007/s10743-005-4935-0
Goldmann, A. (2000). Folk psychology and mental concepts. Protosociology, 14, 4–25.
doi: 10.5840/protosociology2000141
Greenwood, J. (2003). Wundt, Völkerpsychologie, and experimental social psychology. History of Psychology, 6(1), 70–88.
pubmed: 12701575
doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.6.1.70
Greenwood, J. (2004). What happened to the “social” in social psychology? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34(1), 19–34.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00232.x
Gurwitsch, A. (1966). Studies in phenomenology and psychology. Northwestern University Press.
Harnad, S. (1990). The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica d: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346.
doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6
Harnad, S. (2005). Distributed processes, distributed cognizers and collaborative cognition. Pragmatics and Cognition, 13(3), 501–514.
doi: 10.1075/pc.13.3.06har
Horst, S. (1996). Symbols, computation and intentionality: A critique of the computational theory of mind. University of California Press.
Huemer, W. (2019). Franz Brentano— https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/brentano/#school . Retrieved 24 February 2022.
Husserl E. (1900–1901). Logische Untersuchungen I-II. Hamburg.
Husserl E. (1913). Ideen zu einer reinen Phäanomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Halle.
Jadczak, R. (1997). Mistrz i jego uczniowie. Scholar.
Jones, T. (2003). The failure of the best arguments against social reduction (and what that failure doesn’t mean). The Southern Journal of Philosophy, XLI, 547–581.
doi: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2003.tb00966.x
Jovanović, G. (2021). How psychology repressed its founding father Wilhelm Wundt. Human Arenas, 4, 32–47.
doi: 10.1007/s42087-021-00186-2
Katz, D. (1911). Die Erscheinungsweissen der Farben. J. A. Barth.
Kijania-Placek, K., & Woleński, J. (1998). The Lvov-Warsaw school and contemporary philosophy. Kluwer.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-5108-5
Koczanowicz, L., & Koczanowicz-Dehnel, I. (2021). Ideology and science: The story of Polish psychology in the communist period. History of the Human Sciences, 34(3–4), 195–217.
doi: 10.1177/0952695120965506
Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. Liveright Publishing Company.
Kono, T. (2013). Extended mind and after: Socially extended mind and actor-network. Integrative Psychology and Behavioral Science, 48, 48–60.
doi: 10.1007/s12124-013-9242-2
Krajewski, W. (Ed.). (2001). Polish philosophers of sciences and nature in the 20th century. Rodopi.
Kriegel, U. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Franz Brentano and the Brentano School. Routledge.
doi: 10.4324/9781315776460
Luce, D., & Suppes, P. (2002). Representational measurement theory. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–41). Willey & Sons.
Lutz, A., Lachaux, J. P., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. (2002). Guiding the study of brain dynamics using firs-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 1586–1591.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.032658199
Lycan, W. (1999). Intentionality. In R. Wilson & F. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive science (pp. 413–415). The MIT Press Cambridge.
Łukasiewicz, J. (1904). Sprawozdanie z posiedzeń Polskiego Towarzystwa Filozoficznego. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 7, 476–477.
Łuria, A. R. (1976). Podstawy neuropsychologii. PZWL.
Mahrbach, E. (1993). Mental representations and consciousness: Toward a phenomenological theory of representation and reference. Kluwer Academic Publishing.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-2239-1
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, A., Hackert, B., & Weger, U. (2018). Franz Brentano and the beginning of experimental psychology: Implications for the study of psychological phenomena today. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 82, 245–254.
pubmed: 27999952
doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0825-7
Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge University Press.
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511490040
Michell, J. (2021). Representational measurement theory: Is its number up? Theory & Psychology, 31(1), 3–23.
doi: 10.1177/0959354320930817
Michel, O. (2010). The psychology of thinking before the cognitive revolution. History of Psychology, 13(1), 2–24.
doi: 10.1037/a0017442
Miller, G. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 716–743.
pubmed: 21949539
pmcid: 3177535
doi: 10.1177/1745691610388774
Moran, D. (2013). Intentionality: Some lessons from the history of the problem from Brentano to the present. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 21(3), 317–358.
doi: 10.1080/09672559.2013.812605
Mulligan, K. (2004). Brentano on the mind. In D. Jacquette (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Brentano (pp. 66–97). Cambridge University Press.
doi: 10.1017/CCOL0521809800.004
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 115, 2600–2606.
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., Tesser, A., & Borkowski, W. (2000). Society of self: The emergence of collective properties in sel-structures. Psychological Review, 107(1), 39–61.
pubmed: 10687402
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.39
Olson, E. (2011). The extended self. Minds & Machines, 21, 481–495.
doi: 10.1007/s11023-011-9258-7
Palmer, S. E. (2002). Visual awareness. In D. J. Levitin (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive psychology. Core readings (pp. 3–21). MIT.
Pettigrew, Th. (2018). The emergence of contextual social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 963–971.
pubmed: 29528782
doi: 10.1177/0146167218756033
Pickren, W., & Rutheford, A. (2010). A history of modern psychology in context. Willey & Sons Publications.
Płotka, W. (2017). Early Phenomenology in Poland (1895–1945): Origins, development, and breakdown. Studies in East European Thought, 69, 79–91.
doi: 10.1007/s11212-017-9274-0
Płotka, W. (2019). From psychology to phenomenology (and back again): A controversy over the method in the school of Twardowski. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19, 141–167.
doi: 10.1007/s11097-019-09620-x
Płotka, W. (2020). Approaching the variety of lived experiences: On the psychological motives in Leopold Blaustein’s method. Gestalt Theory, 42(2), 181–194.
doi: 10.2478/gth-2020-0015
Raczaszek-Leonardi, J. (2013). Dynamiczne i symboliczne oblicza kognitywistyki: Sposoby integracji [Dynamic and symbolic side of cognitive science: Ways of integration]. Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria, 2, 103–132.
Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2016). Reconciled with complexity in research on cognitive systems. AVANT, 6(2), 117–138.
doi: 10.26913/70202016.0112.0007
Rollinger, R. (2008). Brentano’s psychology and logic and the basis of Twardowski’s theory of presentations. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 4, 1–23.
doi: 10.4148/biyclc.v4i0.130
Rzepa, T. (1997). Psychologia w szkole lwowsko-warszawskiej. Warszawa: PWN.
Rzepa, T. (2019). On the Lvov School and methods of psychological cognition. In A. Drabarek, J. Woleński, & M. Radzki (Eds.), Interdisciplinary investigations into the Lvov-Warsaw School. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rzepa, T., & Dobroczyński, B. (2009). Historia polskiej myśli psychologicznej. PWN.
Rzepa, T., & Stachowski, R. (1993). Roots of the methodology of Polish psychology. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 28, 233–250.
Schimmack, U. (2020). A meta-psychological perspective on the decade of replication failures in social psychology. Canadian Psychology, 61(4), 364–376.
doi: 10.1037/cap0000246
Scriven, M. (1964). Views of human nature. In T. Wann (Ed.), Behaviorism and phenomenology: Contrasting bases for modern psychology (pp. 125–217). University Chicago Press.
Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press.
doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173452
Searle, J. (1984). Minds, brains and science. Harvard University Press.
Searle, J. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 401–415). MIT Press.
Searle, J. (2002). Twenty-one years of the Chinese room. In J. Preston & M. Bishop (Eds.), Views into the Chinese room. New essays on Searle and artificial intelligence (pp. 50–69). Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. (2011). Making the social world. The structure of human civilization. Oxford University Press.
Seron, D. (2017). Brentano’s project of descriptive psychology. In U. Kriegel (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Franz Brentano and the Brentano School (pp. 35–40). Routledge.
doi: 10.4324/9781315776460-4
Stachowski, R. (2007). Historia współczesnej myśli psychologicznej. Od Wundta do czasów najnowszych [The History of Contemporary Psychological Thought. From Wundt to the Newest Times]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar
Sternberg, R., & Sternberg, K. (2012). Cognitive psychology. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Stevens, S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 667–680.
doi: 10.1126/science.103.2684.677
Stevens, S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–49). Wiley.
Stevens, S. (1959). Measurement, psychophysics and utility. In C. W. Churchman & P. Ratoosh (Eds.), Measurement: Definitions and theories (pp. 18–64). Wiley.
Suppes, P., Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., & Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of measurement. Academic Press.
Suppes, P., & Zinnes, J. (1963). Basic measurement theory. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–76). Wiley.
Tassone, B. (2012). From psychology to phenomenology: Franz Brentano’s ’Psychology from an empirical Standpoint. Palgrave Macmillan.
doi: 10.1057/9781137029225
Tatarkiewicz, W. (1913). Szkoła fenomenologów. Ruch Filozoficzny, 3, 257–263.
Tschacher, W., & Tauwalder, J. P. (2003). The dynamical systems approach to cognition. Studies of non-linear phenomena in life science (Vol. 10). World Scientific.
doi: 10.1142/5395
Twardowski, K. (1894/1977). On the content and object of presentations: A psychological investigations [Melbourne International Philosophy Series 4]. Martinus Nijhoff.
Twardowski, K. (1897/1965). Psychologia wobec fizjologii i filozofii [Psychology vs. Physiology and Philosophy]. In K. Twardowski (Ed.), Wybrane pisma filozoficzne [Selected Philosophical Works] (pp. 92–113). PWN.
Twardowski, K. (1898). Wyobrażenia i pojęcia. In K. Twardowski (Ed.), Wybrane prace filozoficzne [Selected Philosophical Works] (pp. 114–197). PWN.
Twardowski, K. (1910/1965). O metodzie psychologii. Przyczynek do metodologii porównawczej badań naukowych [About the method of psychology: Contribution to the methodology of comparative research]. In K. Twardowski (Ed.), Wybrane prace filozoficzne [Selected Philosophical Works] (pp. 205–216). PWN.
Twardowski, K. (1912/1965). O czynnościach i wytworach. Kilka uwag z pogranicza psychologii, gramatyki i logiki [Actions and products: Comments on the border area of psychology, Grammar and logic]. In K. Twardowski (Ed.), Wybrane prace filozoficzne [Selected Philosophical Works] (pp. 217–240). PWN.
Twardowski, K. (1913/1965). O psychologii, jej przedmiocie, zadaniach, metodzie, stosunku do innych nauk i o jej rozwoju [About psychology, its subject, tasks, method, relation to other sciences and its development]. In K. Twardowski (Ed.), Wybrane prace filozoficzne [Selected Philosophical Works] (pp. 241–291). PWN.
Twardowski, K. (1923). O istocie pojęć. In K. Twardowski (Ed.), Wybrane prace filozoficzne [Selected Philosophical Works] (pp. 292–312). PWN.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
doi: 10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001
Varela, F. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy to the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 330–350.
Varela, F., Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001). The brainweb: Phase-synchronization and long-range integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 229–239.
pubmed: 11283746
doi: 10.1038/35067550
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J., Van der Helm, P., & Leeuwen, C. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychologicall Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252.
doi: 10.1037/a0029334
Wang, Q. (2016). Why should we all be cultural psychologists? Lessons from the study of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 583–596.
pubmed: 27694456
pmcid: 5119767
doi: 10.1177/1745691616645552
Wann, T. (Ed.). (1964). Behaviorism and phenomenology: Contrasting bases for modern psychology. University Chicago Press.
Weger, U., & Wagemans, J. (2015). The challenges and opportunities of first-person inquiry in experimental psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 36, 38–49.
doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.09.001
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
Witwicki, W. (1900). Analiza psychologiczna ambicji. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 3(4), 26–49.
Witwicki, W. (1904). Analiza psychologiczna objawów woli. Towarzystwo Nauki Polskiej.
Witwicki, W. (1925/1962). Psychologia, t. 1 [Psychology I]. PWN.
Witwicki, W. (1926/1963). Psychologia, t. 2 [Psychology I]. PWN.
Woleński, J. (2019). Lvov-Warsaw School— https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lvov-warsaw/#SignLvovWarsSchol . 24 Feb 2022.
Wulff, D. (1985). Experimental introspection and religious experience: The Dorpat School of Religious Psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 21, 131–150.
pubmed: 11608763
doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(198504)21:2<131::AID-JHBS2300210205>3.0.CO;2-Q
Wundt, W. (1913). Elemente der Völkerpsychologie. Kroner.
Wundt, W. (1894). Uber psychische Causalität und das Princip des psycho-physischen Parallelismus. Philosophische Studien, 10, 1–124.
Zahavi, D. (2004). Hidden resources: Classical perspectives on subjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11, 10–11.