Tolerance of biofilm of a carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae involved in a duodenoscopy-associated outbreak to the disinfectant used in reprocessing.
Antimicrobial resistance
Carbapenemase
Disinfection
Duodenoscope
Gram-negative
OXA-48
Outbreak
Peracetic acid
Reprocessing
Journal
Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
ISSN: 2047-2994
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 06 2022
03 06 2022
Historique:
received:
11
03
2022
accepted:
01
05
2022
entrez:
6
6
2022
pubmed:
7
6
2022
medline:
9
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
One possible transmission route for nosocomial pathogens is contaminated medical devices. Formation of biofilms can exacerbate the problem. We report on a carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae that had caused an outbreak linked to contaminated duodenoscopes. To determine whether increased tolerance to disinfectants may have contributed to the outbreak, we investigated the susceptibility of the outbreak strain to disinfectants commonly used for duodenoscope reprocessing. Disinfection efficacy was tested on planktonic bacteria and on biofilm. Disinfectant efficacy testing was performed for planktonic bacteria according to EN standards 13727 and 14561 and for biofilm using the Bead Assay for Biofilms. Disinfection was defined as ≥ 5log The outbreak strain was an OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae of sequence type 101. We found a slightly increased tolerance of the outbreak strain in planktonic form to peracetic acid (PAA), but not to other disinfectants tested. Since PAA was the disinfectant used for duodenoscope reprocessing, we investigated the effect of PAA on biofilm of the outbreak strain. Remarkably, disinfection of biofilm of the outbreak strain could not be achieved by the standard PAA concentration used for duodenoscope reprocessing at the time of outbreak. An increased tolerance to PAA was not observed in a K. pneumoniae type strain tested in parallel. Biofilm of the K. pneumoniae outbreak strain was tolerant to standard disinfection during duodenoscope reprocessing. This study establishes for the first time a direct link between biofilm formation, increased tolerance to disinfectants, reprocessing failure of duodenoscopes and nosocomial transmission of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
One possible transmission route for nosocomial pathogens is contaminated medical devices. Formation of biofilms can exacerbate the problem. We report on a carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae that had caused an outbreak linked to contaminated duodenoscopes. To determine whether increased tolerance to disinfectants may have contributed to the outbreak, we investigated the susceptibility of the outbreak strain to disinfectants commonly used for duodenoscope reprocessing. Disinfection efficacy was tested on planktonic bacteria and on biofilm.
METHODS
Disinfectant efficacy testing was performed for planktonic bacteria according to EN standards 13727 and 14561 and for biofilm using the Bead Assay for Biofilms. Disinfection was defined as ≥ 5log
RESULTS
The outbreak strain was an OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae of sequence type 101. We found a slightly increased tolerance of the outbreak strain in planktonic form to peracetic acid (PAA), but not to other disinfectants tested. Since PAA was the disinfectant used for duodenoscope reprocessing, we investigated the effect of PAA on biofilm of the outbreak strain. Remarkably, disinfection of biofilm of the outbreak strain could not be achieved by the standard PAA concentration used for duodenoscope reprocessing at the time of outbreak. An increased tolerance to PAA was not observed in a K. pneumoniae type strain tested in parallel.
CONCLUSIONS
Biofilm of the K. pneumoniae outbreak strain was tolerant to standard disinfection during duodenoscope reprocessing. This study establishes for the first time a direct link between biofilm formation, increased tolerance to disinfectants, reprocessing failure of duodenoscopes and nosocomial transmission of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35659363
doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01112-z
pii: 10.1186/s13756-022-01112-z
pmc: PMC9164365
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbapenems
0
Disinfectants
0
Peracetic Acid
I6KPI2E1HD
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
81Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Pathogens. 2014 Aug 19;3(3):720-31
pubmed: 25438020
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Oct;55(10):1244-310
pubmed: 23011095
Anal Biochem. 1995 Apr 10;226(2):235-40
pubmed: 7793624
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Dec;41(12):1188-94
pubmed: 24021660
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019 Apr;68(4):269-276
pubmed: 30758060
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Nov;67(11):2640-4
pubmed: 22782487
Endoscopy. 2010 Nov;42(11):895-9
pubmed: 20725887
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Jan;56(1):559-62
pubmed: 22083465
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 May 2;7:62
pubmed: 29744043
Biofouling. 2011 Oct;27(9):1017-32
pubmed: 22011093
Infect Dis Health. 2019 Nov;24(4):240-243
pubmed: 31288991
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Apr;26(2):231-54
pubmed: 23554415
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001 Feb;7(2):88-91
pubmed: 11298149
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Dec;51(12):4073-8
pubmed: 24088853
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 May 15;64(10):1435-1444
pubmed: 28200000
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):422-426
pubmed: 29684421
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 17;11(6):e0157663
pubmed: 27315246
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct 16;6(10):457-74
pubmed: 25324917
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006 Spring;3(1):59-67
pubmed: 16602980
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015 Mar 25;4:8
pubmed: 25815166
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 30;16(9):
pubmed: 31052188
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;19(1):56-66
pubmed: 30409683
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018 Oct 10;17(1):36
pubmed: 30314500
Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 02;10:542
pubmed: 31001209
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;39(9):1118-1121
pubmed: 30060770
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 24;17(1):
pubmed: 31878150
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(4):1355-61
pubmed: 22238442
Nat Microbiol. 2019 Nov;4(11):1919-1929
pubmed: 31358985