Elevated non-coding promoter mutations are associated with malignant transformation of melanocytic naevi to melanoma.


Journal

Pathology
ISSN: 1465-3931
Titre abrégé: Pathology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0175411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 27 09 2021
revised: 22 11 2021
accepted: 02 12 2021
pubmed: 7 3 2022
medline: 17 8 2022
entrez: 6 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Evolution from a benign naevus to a melanoma results principally from the stepwise accumulation of mutations. We used a custom next generation sequencing (NGS) panel targeting specific melanoma associated genes to analyse and compare differences between melanomas and their precursor naevi in coding and non-coding mutations and copy number aberrations, with a view to implementing this technique as an ancillary test to assist in the interpretation of difficult to diagnose melanocytic tumours. Fifteen cases of cutaneous melanoma with an adjacent morphologically benign (presumed precursor) naevus were selected. A custom NGS panel was used to sequence 54 melanoma associated genes in both the melanoma and the associated naevus for each case. In three cases, two morphologically distinct regions of the melanoma were sequenced. The adjacent (non-lesional) skin was also tested in nine cases. One case was excluded following molecular testing and clinicopathological reclassification as an epidermotropic melanoma metastasis. Twelve of the 14 tumours showed either BRAF or NRAS driver mutations. The melanomas harboured significantly more mutations than the adjacent naevi, particularly in non-coding promoter regions (p=0.002). There were significantly more non-coding promotor mutations in NRAS-mutant melanomas than BRAF-mutant melanomas (p=0.004). Mutations in TERT promoter regions were found preferentially in melanomas. Oncogenic events found exclusively in melanomas included PTEN loss in two BRAF-mutant melanomas and RAC1 P29S hyperactivating mutations in two NRAS-mutant melanomas. Higher numbers of mutations were present in melanomas compared to their precursor naevi. These findings support the further evaluation of this melanoma custom NGS panel as an ancillary test for interpreting difficult borderline melanocytic lesions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35248370
pii: S0031-3025(22)00061-7
doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.12.289
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf EC 2.7.11.1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

533-540

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Andrew J Colebatch (AJ)

Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Elizabeth C Paver (EC)

Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Ismael A Vergara (IA)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

John F Thompson (JF)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Georgina V Long (GV)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.

James S Wilmott (JS)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Richard A Scolyer (RA)

Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: richard.scolyer@health.nsw.gov.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH