Incidence and Clinical Impact of Bile Leakage after Laparoscopic and Open Liver Resection: An International Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study of 13,379 Patients.
Journal
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
ISSN: 1879-1190
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9431305
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2022
01 02 2022
Historique:
entrez:
25
2
2022
pubmed:
26
2
2022
medline:
30
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite many developments, postoperative bile leakage (POBL) remains a relatively common postoperative complication after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR). This study aimed to assess the incidence and clinical impact of POBL in patients undergoing LLR and OLR in a large international multicenter cohort using a propensity score-matched analysis. Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for all indications between January 2000 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed using a large, international, multicenter liver database including data from 15 tertiary referral centers. Primary outcome was clinically relevant POBL (CR-POBL), defined as Grade B/C POBL. Overall, 13,379 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis (6,369 LLR and 7,010 OLR), with 6.0% POBL. After propensity score matching, a total of 3,563 LLR patients were matched to 3,563 OLR patients. In both groups, propensity score matching accounted for similar extent and types of resections. The incidence of CR-POBL was significantly lower in patients after LLR as compared with patients after OLR (2.6% vs 6.0%; p < 0.001). Among the subgroup of patients with CR-POBL, patients after LLR experienced less severe (non-POBL) postoperative complications (10.1% vs 20.9%; p = 0.028), a shorter hospital stay (12.5 vs 17 days; p = 0.001), and a lower 90-day/in-hospital mortality (0% vs 5.4%; p = 0.027) as compared with patients after OLR with CR-POBL. Patients after LLR seem to experience a lower rate of CR-POBL as compared with the open approach. Our findings suggest that in patients after LLR, the clinical impact of CR-POBL is less than after OLR.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Despite many developments, postoperative bile leakage (POBL) remains a relatively common postoperative complication after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR). This study aimed to assess the incidence and clinical impact of POBL in patients undergoing LLR and OLR in a large international multicenter cohort using a propensity score-matched analysis.
STUDY DESIGN
Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for all indications between January 2000 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed using a large, international, multicenter liver database including data from 15 tertiary referral centers. Primary outcome was clinically relevant POBL (CR-POBL), defined as Grade B/C POBL.
RESULTS
Overall, 13,379 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis (6,369 LLR and 7,010 OLR), with 6.0% POBL. After propensity score matching, a total of 3,563 LLR patients were matched to 3,563 OLR patients. In both groups, propensity score matching accounted for similar extent and types of resections. The incidence of CR-POBL was significantly lower in patients after LLR as compared with patients after OLR (2.6% vs 6.0%; p < 0.001). Among the subgroup of patients with CR-POBL, patients after LLR experienced less severe (non-POBL) postoperative complications (10.1% vs 20.9%; p = 0.028), a shorter hospital stay (12.5 vs 17 days; p = 0.001), and a lower 90-day/in-hospital mortality (0% vs 5.4%; p = 0.027) as compared with patients after OLR with CR-POBL.
CONCLUSION
Patients after LLR seem to experience a lower rate of CR-POBL as compared with the open approach. Our findings suggest that in patients after LLR, the clinical impact of CR-POBL is less than after OLR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35213428
doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000039
pii: 00019464-202202000-00001
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
99-112Investigateurs
Federica Cipriani
(F)
Francesca Ratti
(F)
Nadia Russolillo
(N)
Jacopo Lanari
(J)
Ra'ed Al-Jarrah
(R)
Davit Aghayan
(D)
John N Primrose
(JN)
Felice Giuliante
(F)
Mathieu D'Hondt
(M)
Fernando Rotellar
(F)
David Fuks
(D)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg. 2016;263:761–777.
Kasai M, Cipriani F, Gayet B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Surgery. 2018;163:985–995.
Mirnezami R, Mirnezami AH, Chandrakumaran K, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatic resection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:295–308.
Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, et al. Single-centre comparative study of laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:818–823.
Fretland ÅA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjørnelv GMW, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: The OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267:199–207.
Görgec B, Suhool A, Al-Jarrah R, et al. Surgical technique and clinical results of one- or two-stage laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy after portal vein embolization in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A case series. Int J Surg. 2020;77:69–75.
Aghayan DL, Kazaryan AM, Dagenborg VJ, et al.; OSLO-COMET Survival Study Collaborators. Long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174:175–182.
Cipriani F, Ratti F, Cardella A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: Analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness in a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019.
Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, et al. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: An evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg. 2009;250:856–860.
Panaro F, Hacina L, Bouyabrine H, et al. Risk factors for postoperative bile leakage: A retrospective single-center analysis of 411 hepatectomies. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2016;15:81–86.
Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Koch M, et al. Bilirubin level in the drainage fluid is an early and independent predictor of clinically relevant bile leakage after hepatic resection. Surgery. 2012;152:821–831.
Yokoo H, Miyata H, Konno H, et al. Models predicting the risks of six life-threatening morbidities and bile leakage in 14,970 hepatectomy patients registered in the National Clinical Database of Japan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e5466.
Martin AN, Narayanan S, Turrentine FE, et al. Clinical factors and postoperative impact of bile leak after liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:661–667.
Smith A, Konstantinidis IT, Fong Y, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of minimally invasive liver resections. Laparosc Surg. 2018.
Braunwarth E, Primavesi F, Göbel G, et al. Is bile leakage after hepatic resection associated with impaired long-term survival? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:1077–1083.
Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, et al. One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1198–1206; discussion 1206.
Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins. 2004;240:698–708; discussion 708–710.
Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: Analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002;236:397–406; discussion 406.
Reed DN Jr, Vitale GC, Wrightson WR, et al. Decreasing mortality of bile leaks after elective hepatic surgery. Am J Surg. 2003;185:316–318.
Guillaud A, Pery C, Campillo B, et al. Incidence and predictive factors of clinically relevant bile leakage in the modern era of liver resections. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15:224–229.
Li SQ, Liang LJ, Peng BG, et al. Bile leakage after hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: Risk factors and management. Surgery. 2007;141:340–345.
Lederer A, Seehofer D, Schirmeier A, et al. Postoperative bile leakage inhibits liver regeneration after 70% hepatectomy in rats. J Invest Surg. 2013;26:36–45.
Spetzler VN, Schepers M, Pinnschmidt HO, et al. The incidence and severity of post-hepatectomy bile leaks is affected by surgical indications, preoperative chemotherapy, and surgical procedures. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019;8:101–110.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al.; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1500–1524.
Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: A definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011;149:680–688.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–196.
Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: A definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149:713–724.
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250–278; quiz 279.
Togo S, Matsuo K, Tanaka K, et al. Perioperative infection control and its effectiveness in hepatectomy patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1942–1948.
Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: A definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:528–535.
Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: A review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:351–355.
Lalmahomed ZS, Ayez N, van der Pool AE, et al. Anatomical versus nonanatomical resection of colorectal liver metastases: Is there a difference in surgical and oncological outcome? World J Surg. 2011;35:656–661.
Lonjon G, Porcher R, Ergina P, et al. Potential pitfalls of reporting and bias in observational studies with propensity score analysis assessing a surgical procedure: A methodological systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265:901–909.
Smith AA, Monlezun DJ, Martinie J, et al. Bile leak reduction with laparoscopic versus open liver resection: A multi-institutional propensity score-adjusted multivariable regression analysis. World J Surg. 2020;44:1578–1585.
Kabir T, Syn N, Koh Y-X, et al. Impact of tumor size on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol Elsevier. 2021;0.
Görgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Lanari J, et al. Assessment of textbook outcome in laparoscopic and open liver surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021;156:e212064.
Sakamoto K, Tamesa T, Yukio T, et al. Risk factors and managements of bile leakage after hepatectomy. World J Surg. 2016;40:182–189.
Kajiwara T, Midorikawa Y, Yamazaki S, et al. Clinical score to predict the risk of bile leakage after liver resection. BMC Surg. 2016;16:30.
Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:831–841.
Soubrane O, Goumard C, Laurent A, et al. Laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: A French survey in 351 patients. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:357–365.
Cannon RM, Brock GN, Marvin MR, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection: An examination of our first 300 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:501–507.
Cauchy F, Fuks D, Nomi T, et al. Incidence, risk factors and consequences of bile leakage following laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:3709–3719.
Viganò L, Cimino M, Aldrighetti L, et al.; Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (I Go MILS). Multicentre evaluation of case volume in minimally invasive hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2020;107:443–451.
van der Poel MJ, Fichtinger RS, Bemelmans M, et al.; Dutch Liver Collaborative Group. Implementation and outcome of minor and major minimally invasive liver surgery in the Netherlands. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21:1734–1743.
Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Cillo U, et al.; Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (I GO MILS). Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: A snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry. Updates Surg. 2017;69:271–283.
Farges O, Goutte N, Dokmak S, et al.; ACHBT French Hepatectomy Study Group. How surgical technology translates into practice: The model of laparoscopic liver resections performed in France. Ann Surg. 2014;260:916–921; discussion 921.
Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, et al. The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: From indication to implementation. Ann Surg. 2018;268:11–18.
Syn NL, Kabir T, Koh YX, et al. Survival advantage of laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials and propensity-score matched studies. Ann Surg. 2019.
Spolverato G, Yakoob MY, Kim Y, et al. Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121:2730–2739.
Margonis GA, Sasaki K, Andreatos N, et al. Prognostic impact of complications after resection of early stage hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115:791–804.
Mavros MN, de Jong M, Dogeas E, et al. Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2013;100:711–718.
van der Poel MJ, Barkhatov L, Fuks D, et al. Multicentre propensity score-matched study of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2019;106:783–789.
Sa Cunha A, Laurent C, Rault A, et al. A second liver resection due to recurrent colorectal liver metastases. Arch Surg. 2007;142:1144–1149; discussion 1150.
Cipriani F, Shelat VG, Rawashdeh M, et al. Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing resections for nonperipheral liver lesions, the diamond technique: Technical aspects, clinical outcomes, and oncologic efficiency. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:265–272.
Abu Hilal M, Tschuor C, Kuemmerli C, et al. Laparoscopic posterior segmental resections: How I do it: Tips and pitfalls. Int J Surg. 2020;82S:178–186.
Ulas M, Ozer I, Bostancil EB, et al. Giant hemangiomas: Effects of size and type of surgical procedure on postoperative outcome. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:1297–1301.
Levi Sandri GB, Spoletini G, Vennarecci G, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for large HCC: short- and long-term outcomes in relation to tumor size. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:4772–4779.
Mohkam K, Farges O, Vibert E, et al.; Association de Chirurgie Hépato-Biliaire et de Transplantation (ACHBT) French Hepatectomy Study Group. Risk score to predict biliary leakage after elective liver resection. Br J Surg. 2018;105:128–139.
Mohkam K, Fuks D, Vibert E, et al. External validation and optimization of the French Association of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation’s score to predict severe postoperative biliary leakage after open or laparoscopic liver resection. J Am Coll Surg American College of Surgeons. 2018.
Brauer DG, Nywening TM, Jaques DP, et al. Operative site drainage after hepatectomy: A propensity score matched analysis using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP targeted hepatectomy database. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223:774–783.e2.