Association of Onset-to-Treatment Time With Discharge Destination, Mortality, and Complications Among Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
Australia
Female
Health Services Accessibility
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Intracranial Aneurysm
/ complications
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Patient Discharge
/ statistics & numerical data
Referral and Consultation
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
/ complications
Time-to-Treatment
/ statistics & numerical data
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Surgical Procedures
/ statistics & numerical data
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 01 2022
04 01 2022
Historique:
entrez:
21
1
2022
pubmed:
22
1
2022
medline:
24
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rapid access to specialized care is recommended to improve outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but understanding of the optimal onset-to-treatment time for aneurysmal SAH is limited. To assess the optimal onset-to-treatment time for aneurysmal SAH that maximized patient outcomes after surgery. This cohort study assessed 575 retrospectively identified cases of first-ever aneurysmal SAH occurring within the referral networks of 2 major tertiary Australian hospitals from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016. Individual factors, prehospital factors, and hospital factors were extracted from the digital medical records of eligible cases. Data analysis was performed from March 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021. Main exposure was onset-to-treatment time (time between symptom onset and aneurysm surgical treatment in hours) derived from medical records. Clinical characteristics, complications, and discharge destination were extracted from medical records and 12-month survival obtained from data linkage. The associations of onset-to-treatment time (in hours) with (1) discharge destination of survivors (home vs rehabilitation), (2) 12-month survival, and (3) neurologic complications (rebleed, delayed cerebral ischemia, meningitis, seizure, hydrocephalus, and delayed cerebral injury) were investigated using natural cubic splines in multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models. Of the 575 patients with aneurysmal SAH, 482 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [14.5] years; 337 [69.9%] female) who received endovascular coiling or neurosurgical clipping were studied. A nonlinear association of treatment delay was found with the odds of being discharged home vs rehabilitation (effective df = 3.83 in the generalized additive model, χ2 test P = .002 for the 4-df cubic spline), with a similar nonlinear association remaining significant after adjustment for sex, treatment modality, severity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, history of hypertension, and hospital transfer (likelihood ratio test: df = 3, deviance = 9.57, χ2 test P = .02). Both unadjusted and adjusted cox regression models showed a nonlinear association between time to treatment and 12-month mortality with the lowest hazard of death with receipt of treatment at 12.5 hours after symptom onset, although the nonlinear term became nonsignificant upon adjustment. The odds of being discharged home were higher with treatment before 20 hours after onset, with the probability of being discharged home compared with rehabilitation or other hospital increased by approximately 10% when treatment was received within the first 12.5 hours after symptom onset and increased by an additional 5% from 12.5 to 20 hours. Time to treatment was not associated with any complications. This cohort study found evidence that more favorable outcomes (discharge home and survival at 12 months) were achieved when surgical treatment occurred at approximately 12.5 hours. These findings provide more clarity around optimal timelines of treatment with people with aneurysmal SAH; however, additional studies are needed to confirm the findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35061040
pii: 2788288
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44039
pmc: PMC8783267
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2144039Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Feb 20;33(1):
pubmed: 33533408
Int J Surg. 2017 Dec;48:266-274
pubmed: 29180068
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 15;5(4):e007410
pubmed: 25877280
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2014 Feb;11(1):16-22
pubmed: 24320010
Australas Emerg Care. 2020 Dec;23(4):225-232
pubmed: 32883630
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Aug;21(1):4-13
pubmed: 24639201
Lancet. 2007 Jan 27;369(9558):306-18
pubmed: 17258671
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019 Sep;62(5):526-535
pubmed: 31484228
J Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;124(2):299-304
pubmed: 26381248
Neuroradiology. 2015 Feb;57(2):205-10
pubmed: 25323879
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Sep;162(9):2271-2282
pubmed: 32607744
World Neurosurg. 2012 Feb;77(2):311-5
pubmed: 22120257
Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;31(4):430-433
pubmed: 28436243
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e160-e171
pubmed: 29649648
Interv Neuroradiol. 2013 Jun;19(2):195-202
pubmed: 23693043
Stroke. 2011 Jul;42(7):1936-45
pubmed: 21680909
Neurosurgery. 2006 Jul;59(1):21-7; discussion 21-7
pubmed: 16823296
Neurosurgery. 2002 Feb;50(2):336-40; discussion 340-2
pubmed: 11844269
Crit Care. 2016 Jan 23;20:21
pubmed: 26801901
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;88(3):241-248
pubmed: 28100721
Neurosurgery. 2000 Dec;47(6):1320-9; discussion 1329-31
pubmed: 11126903