Battle of the Appraisals: Pain-Related Injustice Versus Catastrophizing as Mediators in the Relationship Between Pain Intensity and 3-Month Outcomes in Adolescents with Chronic Pain.


Journal

The journal of pain
ISSN: 1528-8447
Titre abrégé: J Pain
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100898657

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2022
Historique:
received: 23 12 2020
revised: 19 07 2021
accepted: 22 07 2021
pubmed: 18 8 2021
medline: 22 3 2022
entrez: 17 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pain appraisals are closely tied to pain and functional outcomes. Pain-related injustice and pain catastrophizing appraisals have both been identified as important cognitive-emotional factors in the pain experience of youth. Although pain-related injustice and catastrophizing have been linked to worse pain outcomes - as primary predictors and intermediary variables - little is known about whether they operate as independent or parallel mediators of the relationship between pain and functioning in youth. We tested pain-related injustice and catastrophizing appraisals as candidate mediators of the relationship between baseline pain intensity and 3-month functional outcomes in adolescents. Youth with chronic pain (N = 89, 76% female, 89% White, average age = 15 years) completed measures assessing pain intensity, pain-related injustice, and catastrophizing at baseline, as well as measures assessing functional disability and overall quality of life 3 months later. Multiple mediation analyses indicated that injustice mediated the relationship between pain intensity and 3 month quality of life. Exploratory analyses of specific quality of life domains indicated that injustice mediated the relationship between pain intensity and 3 month emotional functioning, whereas catastrophizing mediated the relationship between pain intensity and 3 month social functioning. The findings suggest these pain-related appraisals play different intermediary roles in the relationships among pain and future psychosocial outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: Pain-related injustice and catastrophizing appraisals play different intermediary roles in the relationships among pain and future psychosocial outcomes in youth with chronic pain. Treatments targeting pain-related injustice appraisals in pediatric populations are needed to complement existing treatments for catastrophizing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34403788
pii: S1526-5900(21)00298-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.07.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

223-235

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Megan M Miller (MM)

Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: mmm24@iupui.edu.

Amy E Williams (AE)

Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Eric L Scott (EL)

Department of Pediatrics and Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Zina Trost (Z)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Adam T Hirsh (AT)

Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH