Patterns and Predictors of Failure in Recurrent or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphomas After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2021
01 12 2021
Historique:
received:
13
01
2021
revised:
08
06
2021
accepted:
25
06
2021
pubmed:
10
7
2021
medline:
26
2
2022
entrez:
9
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy is capable of eliciting durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) lymphomas. However, most treated patients relapse. Patterns of failure after CAR T have not been previously characterized, and may provide insights into the mechanisms of resistance guiding future treatment strategies. This is a retrospective analysis of patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma who were treated with anti-CD19 CAR T at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2015 and 2019. Pre- and posttreatment positron emission/computed tomography scans were analyzed to assess the progression of existing (local failures) versus new, nonoverlapping lesions (de novo failures) and identify lesions at a high risk for progression. A total of 469 pretreatment lesions in 63 patients were identified. At a median follow-up of 12.6 months, 36 patients (57%) recurred. Most (n = 31; 86%) had a component of local failure, and 13 patients (36%) exhibited strictly local failures. Even when progressing, 84% of recurrent patients continued to have a subset of pretreatment lesions maintain positron emission/computed tomography resolution. Lesions at a high risk for local failure included those with a diameter ≥5 cm (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-3.55; P < .001), maximum standardized uptake value ≥10 (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.38-3.12; P < .001), or those that were extranodal (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.04; P = .01). In the 69 patients eligible for survival analysis, those with any lesion ≥5 cm (n = 46; 67%) experienced inferior progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.15-5.04; P = .02) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.17-9.96; P = .02). Most patients who recur after CAR T experience a component of local progression. Furthermore, lesions with high-risk features, particularly large size, were associated with inferior treatment efficacy and patient survival. Taken together, these observations suggest that lesion-specific resistance may contribute to CAR T treatment failure. Locally directed therapies to high-risk lesions, such as radiation therapy, may be a viable strategy to prevent CAR T failures in select patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34242714
pii: S0360-3016(21)00851-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.06.038
pmc: PMC9791939
mid: NIHMS1854677
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1145-1154Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K23 CA201594
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA076292
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Aug;155(2):267-70
pubmed: 2115249
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Sep 1;108(1):178-188
pubmed: 32446950
Br J Haematol. 2020 Jul;190(1):45-51
pubmed: 32135029
Am J Hematol. 2019 Aug;94(8):E209-E213
pubmed: 31056762
Immunology. 2018 Jul;154(3):354-362
pubmed: 29485185
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Dec 1;105(5):1012-1021
pubmed: 31175906
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 10;32(11):1112-8
pubmed: 24493716
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Nov;25(11):e344-e351
pubmed: 31279751
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4643-51
pubmed: 15837966
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jul 1;86(3):569-77
pubmed: 23540349
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Aug 1;107(5):909-933
pubmed: 32272184
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3119-3128
pubmed: 32401634
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Mar;84(3):372-377
pubmed: 25559168
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):31-42
pubmed: 30518502
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15;89(4):854-62
pubmed: 23790512
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):579-86
pubmed: 17242396
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 20;33(6):540-9
pubmed: 25154820
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2545-2554
pubmed: 29226764
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 3;380(1):45-56
pubmed: 30501490
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb 15;157(4):364-75
pubmed: 12578807
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Feb;52(1):5-15
pubmed: 29391907
Blood Adv. 2020 Jul 14;4(13):2871-2883
pubmed: 32589728
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2531-2544
pubmed: 29226797