Coronary artery disease burden relation with the presentation of acute cardiac events and ventricular fibrillation.
Gensini score
acute coronary syndrome
cardiac arrest
chronic total occlusion
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
27
03
2021
accepted:
18
06
2021
pubmed:
9
7
2021
medline:
8
4
2022
entrez:
8
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evaluate the differences in coronary artery disease (CAD) burden between patients with ischemic resuscitated, ischemic refractory VT/VF OHCA events and N/STEMI. Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting with initial shockable rhythms (VT/VF OHCA) have the highest mortality among patients with acute cardiac events. No predictors of VT/VF OHCA refractoriness have been identified. A retrospective cohort design was used to assess baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and the angiographic severity of disease among patients with VT/VF OHCA undergoing emergent coronary angiography at the University of Minnesota Medical Center. The Gensini score was calculated for all patients to assess the angiographic burden of CAD. For patients with ischemia-related cardiac arrest, outcomes were further compared to an independent non-OHCA population presenting with N/STEMI. During the study period, 538 patients were admitted after VT/VF OHCA. Among them, 305 presented with resuscitated, and 233 with refractory VT/VF. 66% of resuscitated and 70% of refractory VT/VF had an underlying, angiographically documented, ischemic etiology. Ischemic resuscitated and refractory VT/VF had significant differences in Gensini score, (80.7 ± 3.6 and 127.6 ± 7.1, respectively, p < 0.001) and survival (77.3% and 30.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). Both groups had a higher CAD burden and worse survival than the non-OHCA N/STEMI population (360 patients). Ischemic refractory VT/VF was significantly more likely to present with chronic total occlusion in comparison to both N/STEMI and ischemic resuscitated VT/VF. Ischemia-related, refractory VT/VF OHCA has a higher burden of CAD and the presence of CTOs compared to resuscitated VT/VF OHCA and N/STEMI.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVES
Evaluate the differences in coronary artery disease (CAD) burden between patients with ischemic resuscitated, ischemic refractory VT/VF OHCA events and N/STEMI.
BACKGROUND
Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting with initial shockable rhythms (VT/VF OHCA) have the highest mortality among patients with acute cardiac events. No predictors of VT/VF OHCA refractoriness have been identified.
METHODS
A retrospective cohort design was used to assess baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and the angiographic severity of disease among patients with VT/VF OHCA undergoing emergent coronary angiography at the University of Minnesota Medical Center. The Gensini score was calculated for all patients to assess the angiographic burden of CAD. For patients with ischemia-related cardiac arrest, outcomes were further compared to an independent non-OHCA population presenting with N/STEMI.
RESULTS
During the study period, 538 patients were admitted after VT/VF OHCA. Among them, 305 presented with resuscitated, and 233 with refractory VT/VF. 66% of resuscitated and 70% of refractory VT/VF had an underlying, angiographically documented, ischemic etiology. Ischemic resuscitated and refractory VT/VF had significant differences in Gensini score, (80.7 ± 3.6 and 127.6 ± 7.1, respectively, p < 0.001) and survival (77.3% and 30.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). Both groups had a higher CAD burden and worse survival than the non-OHCA N/STEMI population (360 patients). Ischemic refractory VT/VF was significantly more likely to present with chronic total occlusion in comparison to both N/STEMI and ischemic resuscitated VT/VF.
CONCLUSION
Ischemia-related, refractory VT/VF OHCA has a higher burden of CAD and the presence of CTOs compared to resuscitated VT/VF OHCA and N/STEMI.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
804-811Informations de copyright
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141:139-596. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757
Hasegawa M, Abe T, Nagata T, Onozuka D, Hagihara A. The number of prehospital defibrillation shocks and 1-month survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0112-4
Gregers E, Kjaergaard J, Lippert F, et al. Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation at hospital arrival - survival and neurological outcome without extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care. 2018;22:242. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2176-9
Goto Y, Funada A, Goto Y. Relationship between the duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and favorable neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:2819. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002819
Yannopoulos D, Bartos J, Raveendran G, et al. Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1807-1816. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736
Smilowitz NR, Mahajan AM, Roe MT, et al. Mortality of myocardial infarction by sex, age, and obstructive coronary artery disease status in the ACTION registry-GWTG (acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network registry-get with the guidelines). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10:3443. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003443
Karam N, Bataille S, Marijon E, et al. Incidence, mortality, and outcome-predictors of sudden cardiac arrest complicating myocardial infarction prior to hospital admission. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:7081. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007081
Lamhaut L, Tea V, Raphalen JH, et al. Coronary lesions in refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated by extra corporeal pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Resuscitation. 2018;126:154-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.12.017
Yannopoulos D, Bartos JA, Aufderheide TP, et al. The evolving role of the cardiac catheterization laboratory in the management of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:530-552. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000630
Bartos JA, Grunau B, Carlson C, et al. Improved survival with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation despite progressive metabolic derangement associated with prolonged resuscitation. Circulation. 2020;141:877-886. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042173
Yannopoulos D, Bartos JA, Raveendran G, et al. Coronary artery disease in patients with out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1109-1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.059
Adabag AS, Peterson G, Apple FS, Titus J, King R, Luepker RV. Etiology of sudden death in the community: results of anatomical, metabolic, and genetic evaluation. Am Heart J. 2010;159:33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.019
Davies MJ, Thomas A. Thrombosis and acute coronary-artery lesions in sudden cardiac ischemic death. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:1137-1140. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198405033101801
Yannopoulos D, Bartos JA, Martin C, et al. Minnesota resuscitation consortium's advanced perfusion and reperfusion cardiac life support strategy for out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(6):003732. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003732
Bartos JA, Carlson K, Carlson C, et al. Surviving refractory out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest: critical care and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management. Resuscitation. 2018;132:47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.030
Bartos JA, Frascone RJ, Conterato M, et al. The Minnesota mobile extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation consortium for treatment of out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation: program description, performance, and outcomes. Clin Med. 2020;29:100632.
Buchwald H, Hunter DW, Tuna N, et al. Myocardial infarction and percent arteriographic stenosis of culprit lesion: report from the program on the surgical control of the hyperlipidemias (POSCH). Atherosclerosis. 1998;138:391-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9150
Frøbert O, van't Veer M, Aarnoudse W, Simonsen U, Koolen JJ, Pijls NHJ. Acute myocardial infarction and underlying stenosis severity. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:958-965. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21280
Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51:606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149
Rampidis GP, Benetos G, Benz DC, Giannopoulos AA, Buechel RR. A guide for Gensini score calculation. Atherosclerosis. 2019;287:181-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.05.012
Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, et al. TIMI frame count. Circulation. 1996;93:879-888. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.879
Janardhanan R, Kenchaiah S, Velazquez EJ, et al. Extent of coronary artery disease as a predictor of outcomes in acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. Am Heart J. 2006;152:183-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.11.013
Fernando SM, Vaillancourt C, Morrow S, Stiell IG. Analysis of bystander CPR quality during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using data derived from automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation. 2018;128:138-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.012
Buick JE, Drennan IR, Scales DC, et al. Improving temporal trends in survival and neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11:3561. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003561
Yap SC, Sakhi R, Theuns DAMJ, et al. Increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with chronic total coronary occlusion. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:124-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.004
Chi WK, Gong M, Bazoukis G, et al. Impact of coronary artery chronic total occlusion on arrhythmic and mortality outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:1214-1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.06.011
Kalkan K, Hamur H, Yildirim E, et al. The comparison of angiographic scoring systems with the predictors of atherosclerosis. Angiology. 2018;69(2):158-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003319717712118
Naoto M, Nobuaki K, Junichi N, et al. Abstract 15183: do two scoring systems of coronary stenosis, syntax score and Gensini score, similarly predict clinical outcome after PCI in patients with stable angina pectoris? Circulation. 2014;130:15183. https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.130.suppl_2.15183
Neeland IJ, Patel RS, Eshtehardi P, et al. Coronary angiographic scoring systems: An evaluation of their equivalence and validity. Am Heart J. 2012;164:547-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.007