Validation of the revised 9-scale clinical frailty scale (CFS) in Greek language.
Clinical frailty scale
Elderly
Frailty
Validation
Journal
BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 06 2021
29 06 2021
Historique:
received:
21
03
2021
accepted:
02
06
2021
entrez:
30
6
2021
pubmed:
1
7
2021
medline:
9
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Among many screening tools that have been developed to detect frailty in older adults, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a valid, reliable and easy-to-use tool that has been translated in several languages. The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable version of the CFS to the Greek language. A Greek version was obtained by translation (English to Greek) and back translation (Greek to English). The "known-group" construct validity of the CFS was determined by using test for trends. Criterion concurrent validity was assessed by evaluating the extent that CFS relates to Barthel Index, using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Both inter-rater and test-retest reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient. Known groups comparison supports the construct validity of the CFS. The strong negative correlation between CFS and Barthel Index (r The Greek version of the CFS is a valid and reliable instrument for the identification of frailty in the Greek population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Among many screening tools that have been developed to detect frailty in older adults, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a valid, reliable and easy-to-use tool that has been translated in several languages. The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable version of the CFS to the Greek language.
METHODS
A Greek version was obtained by translation (English to Greek) and back translation (Greek to English). The "known-group" construct validity of the CFS was determined by using test for trends. Criterion concurrent validity was assessed by evaluating the extent that CFS relates to Barthel Index, using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Both inter-rater and test-retest reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient.
RESULTS
Known groups comparison supports the construct validity of the CFS. The strong negative correlation between CFS and Barthel Index (r
CONCLUSION
The Greek version of the CFS is a valid and reliable instrument for the identification of frailty in the Greek population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34187373
doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02318-3
pii: 10.1186/s12877-021-02318-3
pmc: PMC8243421
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
393Références
BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Mar 15;19(1):63
pubmed: 30876423
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62
pubmed: 23395245
Eur Geriatr Med. 2018;9(6):891-901
pubmed: 30574216
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Nov;225(5):658-665.e3
pubmed: 28888692
Ageing Res Rev. 2016 Mar;26:53-61
pubmed: 26674984
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Feb;20(2):171-176
pubmed: 30108033
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jun;20(6):672-678
pubmed: 30737166
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):392-7
pubmed: 23764209
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):393
pubmed: 33028215
Age Ageing. 2014 Nov;43(6):744-7
pubmed: 25336440
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jul 25;16:145
pubmed: 27455962
Acta Clin Belg. 2020 Jun;75(3):200-204
pubmed: 30919742
Can Geriatr J. 2016 Jun 29;19(2):34-9
pubmed: 27403211
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jul-Aug;55(1):22-4
pubmed: 21764151
J Crit Care. 2018 Aug;46:67-72
pubmed: 29705407
Aging Med (Milton). 2018 Jul 10;1(2):120-124
pubmed: 31942488
Clin Geriatr Med. 2017 Aug;33(3):293-303
pubmed: 28689563
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613-9
pubmed: 1607900
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95
pubmed: 16129869
J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(9):920-927
pubmed: 33155616
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jun;21(6):772-779.e6
pubmed: 32387112
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Nov;35:24-34
pubmed: 27596721
Age Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;49(6):1071-1079
pubmed: 32392289
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Oct;65(10):2134-2139
pubmed: 28422280
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):47
pubmed: 33441092
Drugs Aging. 2018 Oct;35(10):897-905
pubmed: 30203312
Circulation. 2011 Nov 29;124(22):2397-404
pubmed: 22064593
Can Geriatr J. 2020 Sep 01;23(3):210-215
pubmed: 32904824
Can Geriatr J. 2018 Mar 26;21(1):1-5
pubmed: 29581815
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Jul;17(7):1063-1068
pubmed: 27426434
ScientificWorldJournal. 2001 Aug 08;1:323-36
pubmed: 12806071
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):322
pubmed: 31752699
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):638.e7-638.e11
pubmed: 28587850
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2011 Dec;9(4):387-90
pubmed: 22182814
J Frailty Aging. 2021;10(1):38-43
pubmed: 33331620
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jul 13;18(1):162
pubmed: 30005622
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Jan;72(1):68-74
pubmed: 26400735
Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Sep;139(9):1136-9
pubmed: 7114305
Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):64-7
pubmed: 3042746
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Jan;18(1):57-64
pubmed: 28762628
J Crit Care. 2019 Aug;52:193-199
pubmed: 31096100
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019 Feb 14;12:23-30
pubmed: 30858741
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 3;20(1):443
pubmed: 33143651
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Jun;11(5):344-55
pubmed: 20511102
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Jul 01;11:33
pubmed: 21722355
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007 Nov;8(9):595-603
pubmed: 17998116
J Aging Health. 2015 Jun;27(4):670-85
pubmed: 25414168
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Jan - Feb;80:104-114
pubmed: 30448693
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2003 Jun;15(3 Suppl):1-29
pubmed: 14580013
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 May;63(5):860-8
pubmed: 25989564
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Apr;6(7):111
pubmed: 29955571
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):35-41
pubmed: 30632249