Factors influencing thrombectomy decision making for primary medium vessel occlusion stroke.


Journal

Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 01 03 2021
revised: 20 04 2021
accepted: 20 04 2021
pubmed: 6 5 2021
medline: 23 3 2022
entrez: 5 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We aimed to explore the preference of stroke physicians to treat patients with primary medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) stroke with immediate endovascular treatment (EVT) in an international cross-sectional survey, as there is no clear guideline recommendation for EVT in these patients. In the survey MeVO-Finding Rationales and Objectifying New Targets for IntervEntional Revascularization in Stroke (MeVO-FRONTIERS), participants were shown four cases of primary MeVOs (six scenarios per case) and asked whether they would treat those patients with EVT. Multivariable logistic regression with clustering by respondent was performed to assess factors influencing the decision to treat. Dominance analysis was performed to assess the influence of factors within the scenarios on decision making. Overall, 366 participants (56 women; 15%) from 44 countries provided 8784 answers to 24 scenarios. Most physicians (59.2%) would treat patients immediately with EVT. Younger patient age (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.24, 99% CI 1.19 to 1.30), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (IRR 1.69, 99% CI 1.57 to 1.82), and small core volume (IRR 1.35, 99% CI 1.24 to 1.46) were positively associated with the decision to treat with EVT. Interventionalists (IRR 1.26, 99% CI 1.01 to 1.56) were more likely to treat patients with MeVO immediately with EVT. In the dominance analysis, factors influencing the decision in favor of EVT were (in order of importance): baseline NIHSS, core volume, alteplase use, patients' age, and occlusion site. Most physicians in this survey were interventionalists and would treat patients with MeVO stroke immediately with EVT. This finding supports the need for robust clinical evidence.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
We aimed to explore the preference of stroke physicians to treat patients with primary medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) stroke with immediate endovascular treatment (EVT) in an international cross-sectional survey, as there is no clear guideline recommendation for EVT in these patients.
METHODS METHODS
In the survey MeVO-Finding Rationales and Objectifying New Targets for IntervEntional Revascularization in Stroke (MeVO-FRONTIERS), participants were shown four cases of primary MeVOs (six scenarios per case) and asked whether they would treat those patients with EVT. Multivariable logistic regression with clustering by respondent was performed to assess factors influencing the decision to treat. Dominance analysis was performed to assess the influence of factors within the scenarios on decision making.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 366 participants (56 women; 15%) from 44 countries provided 8784 answers to 24 scenarios. Most physicians (59.2%) would treat patients immediately with EVT. Younger patient age (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.24, 99% CI 1.19 to 1.30), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (IRR 1.69, 99% CI 1.57 to 1.82), and small core volume (IRR 1.35, 99% CI 1.24 to 1.46) were positively associated with the decision to treat with EVT. Interventionalists (IRR 1.26, 99% CI 1.01 to 1.56) were more likely to treat patients with MeVO immediately with EVT. In the dominance analysis, factors influencing the decision in favor of EVT were (in order of importance): baseline NIHSS, core volume, alteplase use, patients' age, and occlusion site.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Most physicians in this survey were interventionalists and would treat patients with MeVO stroke immediately with EVT. This finding supports the need for robust clinical evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33947769
pii: neurintsurg-2021-017472
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017472
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

350-355

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: AMD reports editorial board membership at International Journal of Stroke (Editor). BKM reports editorial board membership at Stroke (Assistant Editor). MC reports personal fees from Stryker, personal fees from Microvention, Medtronic, Genentech, Cerenovus, Penumbra outside the submitted work; and editorial board membership at Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (Commissioning Editor). JF reports grants and personal fees from Stryker, Acandis, Microvention, Medtronic, personal fees from Codman, Ceronovus, Penumbra, Phenox, other (stock ownership) from Tegus outside the submitted work; and editorial board memberships at Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (Associate Editor) and Clinical Neuroradiology (Editor); and Executive functions with University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Eppdata GmbH. MG reports personal fees from Stryker, personal fees from Mentice, Microvention, and Medtronic outside the submitted work; and editorial board membership at Stroke (Consulting Editor). In addition, NG has a patent for Systems of acute stroke diagnosis issued and licensed. PC, MK, NS, NK, JMO, RM, NS have nothing to disclose.

Auteurs

Petra Cimflova (P)

Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Medical Imaging, Fakultní nemocnice u sv Anny v Brně, Brno, Czech Republic.

Manon Kappelhof (M)

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Nishita Singh (N)

Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Nima Kashani (N)

Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Neuroradiology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Johanna Maria Ospel (JM)

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitatsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Rosalie McDonough (R)

Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Andrew M Demchuk (AM)

Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Bijoy K Menon (BK)

Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Nobuyuki Sakai (N)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Michael Chen (M)

Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Jens Fiehler (J)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Mayank Goyal (M)

Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada mgoyal2412@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH