Long-term outcomes following endovascular and surgical revascularization for peripheral artery disease: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Mortality
Peripheral artery disease
Revascularization
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 12 2021
28 12 2021
Historique:
received:
05
11
2020
revised:
26
01
2021
accepted:
14
02
2021
pubmed:
25
2
2021
medline:
7
1
2022
entrez:
24
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) revascularization can be performed by either endovascular or open surgical approach. Despite increasing use of endovascular revascularization, it is still uncertain which strategy yields better long-term outcomes. This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients hospitalized with PAD in Australia and New Zealand who underwent either endovascular or surgical revascularization between 2008 and 2015, and compared procedures using a propensity score-matched analysis. Hybrid interventions were excluded. The primary endpoint was mortality or major adverse limb events (MALE), defined as a composite endpoint of acute limb ischaemia, urgent surgical or endovascular reintervention, or major amputation, up to 8 years post-hospitalization using time-to-event analyses 75 189 patients fulfilled eligibility (15 239 surgery and 59 950 endovascular), from whom 14 339 matched pairs (mean ± SD age 71 ± 12 years, 73% male) with good covariate balance were identified. Endovascular revascularization was associated with an increase in combined MALE or mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.17, P < 0.001]. There was a similar risk of MALE (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.99-1.10, P = 0.15), and all-cause urgent rehospitalizations (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.98-1.04, P = 0.57), but higher mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11-1.21, P < 0.001) when endovascular repair was compared to surgery. In subgroup analysis, these findings were consistent for both claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischaemia presentations. Although the long-term risk of MALE was comparable for both approaches, enduring advantages of surgical revascularization included lower long-term mortality. This is at odds with some prior PAD studies and highlights contention in this space.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33624819
pii: 6149004
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab116
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
32-40Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.