The power of a checklist: Decrease in emergency department epistaxis transfers after clinical care pathway implementation.
Administration, Topical
Cohort Studies
Critical Pathways
Documentation
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Endoscopy
Epistaxis
/ diagnosis
Hemostatic Techniques
Interdisciplinary Communication
Patient Care
/ methods
Patient Care Team
Patient Transfer
/ statistics & numerical data
Quality Improvement
Quality of Health Care
Tertiary Care Centers
/ statistics & numerical data
Vasoconstrictor Agents
/ administration & dosage
Clinical care pathway
Epistaxis
Hospital transfers
Quality improvement
Standard of care
Journal
American journal of otolaryngology
ISSN: 1532-818X
Titre abrégé: Am J Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8000029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
20
01
2021
accepted:
23
01
2021
pubmed:
17
2
2021
medline:
4
11
2021
entrez:
16
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Annually, epistaxis costs US hospitals over $100 million dollars. Many patients visit emergency departments (ED) with variable treatment, thus providing opportunity for improvement. To implement an epistaxis clinical care pathway (CCP) in the ED, and analyze its effects on treatment and ED transfers. An interdisciplinary team developed the CCP to be implemented at a tertiary hospital system with 11 satellite EDs. The analysis included matched eight-month periods prior to pathway implementation and after pathway implementation. Subjects included patients with ICD-10 code diagnosis of epistaxis. Patients under 18 years old, recent surgery or trauma, or bleeding disorders were excluded. There were 309 patients from the pre-implementation cohort, 53 of which were transferred and 37 met inclusion criteria; 322 from the post-implementation cohort, 37 of which were transferred, and 15 met inclusion criteria. Outcome measures included epistaxis intervention by ED providers and otolaryngologists before and after pathway implementation. CCP implementation resulted in a 61% reduction in patient transfers (p < 0.001). ED providers showed a 51% increase in documentation of anterior rhinoscopy with proper equipment, 34% increased use of topical vasoconstrictors, 40% increased use of absorbable packing, 7% decrease in use of unilateral non-absorbable packing, and 17% decrease in use of bilateral non-absorbable packing. Prior to CCP implementation, ED treatment of epistaxis varied significantly. CCP resulted in standardized treatment and significant reduction in transfers. A CCP checklist is an effective way to standardize care and prevent unnecessary hospital transfers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Annually, epistaxis costs US hospitals over $100 million dollars. Many patients visit emergency departments (ED) with variable treatment, thus providing opportunity for improvement.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To implement an epistaxis clinical care pathway (CCP) in the ED, and analyze its effects on treatment and ED transfers.
METHODS
METHODS
An interdisciplinary team developed the CCP to be implemented at a tertiary hospital system with 11 satellite EDs. The analysis included matched eight-month periods prior to pathway implementation and after pathway implementation. Subjects included patients with ICD-10 code diagnosis of epistaxis. Patients under 18 years old, recent surgery or trauma, or bleeding disorders were excluded. There were 309 patients from the pre-implementation cohort, 53 of which were transferred and 37 met inclusion criteria; 322 from the post-implementation cohort, 37 of which were transferred, and 15 met inclusion criteria. Outcome measures included epistaxis intervention by ED providers and otolaryngologists before and after pathway implementation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
CCP implementation resulted in a 61% reduction in patient transfers (p < 0.001). ED providers showed a 51% increase in documentation of anterior rhinoscopy with proper equipment, 34% increased use of topical vasoconstrictors, 40% increased use of absorbable packing, 7% decrease in use of unilateral non-absorbable packing, and 17% decrease in use of bilateral non-absorbable packing.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Prior to CCP implementation, ED treatment of epistaxis varied significantly. CCP resulted in standardized treatment and significant reduction in transfers. A CCP checklist is an effective way to standardize care and prevent unnecessary hospital transfers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33592555
pii: S0196-0709(21)00042-9
doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102941
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Vasoconstrictor Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102941Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.