Clinical outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A 3-year follow-up study.
clinical outcomes
laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
objective success rate
subjective success rate
surgical complications
Journal
International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association
ISSN: 1442-2042
Titre abrégé: Int J Urol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9440237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
09
04
2020
accepted:
15
10
2020
pubmed:
13
1
2021
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
12
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the mid-range subjective and objective success rate of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Of the 317 women with pelvic organ prolapse who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy surgery at the same center between January 2013 and March 2015, we assessed 233 patients who were followed up for >3 years. We carried out urogynecological examinations and used questionnaires for the postoperative assessment of the patients. Scoring 0 points on question 3 of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 was considered to show subjective success. Objective success was defined as stage 0 or 1 on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification. The subjective and objective success rates in the third year after surgery were 89.7% (209/233) and 90.6% (211/233), respectively, and those in the first year were 90.6% (211/233) and 91.0% (212/233), respectively. Perioperative complications included bladder injury (0.4%) in one case and vaginal wall injury (0.4%) in one case. Postoperative complications included the incidence of chronic pain (mesh retraction) in one case, which was the only case requiring re-operation due to complications (0.4%); vaginal suture exposure (0.4%) in one case; port-site hernia (0.4%) in one case; and subileus (0.4%) in one case. The complications associated with voiding function included de novo stress urinary incontinence (20.6%) in 48 cases, out of which there were 12 cases of de novo overactive bladder (5.2%) and eight cases required midurethral sling procedures. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy provides a good outcome with a low rate of subjective and objective recurrence and surgical complications.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
216-219Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Japanese Urological Association.
Références
Lowder JL, Ghetti C, Nikolajski C, Oliphant SS, Zyczynski HM. Body image perceptions in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a qualitative study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 204: 441.e1.
Hospital Intelligence Agency. Pages of DPC statistics. n.d. [Cited 30 Mar 2020.] Available from URL: https://hospia.jp/dpc
US Food and Drug Administration. Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse. 2011. [Cited 30 Mar 2020.] Available from URL: https://www.fda.gov/media/81123/download
Sarlos D, Kots L, Ryu G, Schaer G. Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2014; 25: 1207-12.
Sergent F, Resch B, Loisel C, Bisson V, Schaal JP, Marpeau L. Mid-term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior polyester mesh for treatment of genito-urinary prolapse. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2011; 156: 217-22.
US Food and Drug Administration. Urogynecologic surgical mesh implants. n.d. [Cited 30 Mar 2020.] Available from URL: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/implants-and-prosthetics/urogynecologic-surgical-mesh-implants
Gonocruz SG, Hayashi T, Tokiwa S et al. Transvaginal surgery using self-cut mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: 3-year clinical outcomes. Int. J. Urol. 2019; 26: 731-6.
Moore RD, Miklos JR. Vaginal repair of cystocele with anterior wall mesh via transobturator route: efficacy and complications with up to 3-year followup. Adv. Urol. 2009: 743831.
Kato K, Suzuki S, Yamamoto S et al. Clinical pathway for tension-free vaginal mesh procedure: evaluation in 300 patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Int. J. Urol. 2009; 16: 314-7.
Schmid C, O’Rourke P, Maher C. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after failed transvaginalpolypropylene mesh surgery. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2013; 24: 763-7.
Vandendriessche D, Sussfeld J, Giraudet G, Lucot JP, Behal H, Cosson M. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2017; 28: 231-9.
Gonzalgo ML, Pavlovich CP, Trock BJ, Link RE, Sullivan W, Su LM. Classification and trends of perioperative morbidities following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2005; 174: 135-9.
de Boer TA, Salvatore S, Cardozo L et al. Pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2010; 29: 30-9.
Wagner L, Chevrot A, Llinares E, Costa P, Droupy S. Long-term anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a prospective study. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2019; 51: 795-802.
Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA 2013; 309: 2016-24.