Phase 2 study of buparlisib (BKM120), a pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
Adult
Aged
Aminopyridines
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Disease Progression
Female
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Middle Aged
Morpholines
/ administration & dosage
Neoplasm Metastasis
Patient Safety
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Proteomics
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
BKM120
Buparlisib
PI3K pathway
Phase 1
Triple-negative breast cancer
Journal
Breast cancer research : BCR
ISSN: 1465-542X
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100927353
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 11 2020
02 11 2020
Historique:
received:
05
05
2020
accepted:
11
10
2020
entrez:
3
11
2020
pubmed:
4
11
2020
medline:
14
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Treatment options for triple-negative breast cancer remain limited. Activation of the PI3K pathway via loss of PTEN and/or INPP4B is common. Buparlisib is an orally bioavailable, pan-class I PI3K inhibitor. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of buparlisib in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. This was a single-arm phase 2 study enrolling patients with triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients were treated with buparlisib at a starting dose of 100 mg daily. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit, defined as confirmed complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for ≥ 4 months, per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. A subset of patients underwent pre- and on-treatment tumor tissue biopsies for correlative studies. Fifty patients were enrolled. Median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-10). The clinical benefit rate was 12% (6 patients, all SD ≥ 4 months). Median PFS was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.3). Median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.2-25). The most frequent adverse events were fatigue (58% all grades, 8% grade 3), nausea (34% all grades, none grade 3), hyperglycemia (34% all grades, 4% grade 3), and anorexia (30% all grades, 2% grade 3). Eighteen percent of patients experienced depression (12% grade 1, 6% grade 2) and anxiety (10% grade 1, 8% grade 2). Alterations in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN were present in 6/27 patients with available targeted DNA sequencing (MSK-IMPACT), 3 of whom achieved SD as best overall response though none with clinical benefit ≥ 4 months. Of five patients with paired baseline and on-treatment biopsies, reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) analysis demonstrated reduction of S6 phosphorylation in 2 of 3 patients who achieved SD, and in none of the patients with progressive disease. Buparlisib was associated with prolonged SD in a very small subset of patients with triple-negative breast cancer; however, no confirmed objective responses were observed. Downmodulation of key nodes in the PI3K pathway was observed in patients who achieved SD. PI3K pathway inhibition alone may be insufficient as a therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer. NCT01790932 . Registered on 13 February 2013; NCT01629615 . Registered on 27 June 2012.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Treatment options for triple-negative breast cancer remain limited. Activation of the PI3K pathway via loss of PTEN and/or INPP4B is common. Buparlisib is an orally bioavailable, pan-class I PI3K inhibitor. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of buparlisib in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
METHODS
This was a single-arm phase 2 study enrolling patients with triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients were treated with buparlisib at a starting dose of 100 mg daily. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit, defined as confirmed complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for ≥ 4 months, per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. A subset of patients underwent pre- and on-treatment tumor tissue biopsies for correlative studies.
RESULTS
Fifty patients were enrolled. Median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-10). The clinical benefit rate was 12% (6 patients, all SD ≥ 4 months). Median PFS was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.3). Median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.2-25). The most frequent adverse events were fatigue (58% all grades, 8% grade 3), nausea (34% all grades, none grade 3), hyperglycemia (34% all grades, 4% grade 3), and anorexia (30% all grades, 2% grade 3). Eighteen percent of patients experienced depression (12% grade 1, 6% grade 2) and anxiety (10% grade 1, 8% grade 2). Alterations in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN were present in 6/27 patients with available targeted DNA sequencing (MSK-IMPACT), 3 of whom achieved SD as best overall response though none with clinical benefit ≥ 4 months. Of five patients with paired baseline and on-treatment biopsies, reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) analysis demonstrated reduction of S6 phosphorylation in 2 of 3 patients who achieved SD, and in none of the patients with progressive disease.
CONCLUSIONS
Buparlisib was associated with prolonged SD in a very small subset of patients with triple-negative breast cancer; however, no confirmed objective responses were observed. Downmodulation of key nodes in the PI3K pathway was observed in patients who achieved SD. PI3K pathway inhibition alone may be insufficient as a therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT01790932 . Registered on 13 February 2013; NCT01629615 . Registered on 27 June 2012.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33138866
doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01354-y
pii: 10.1186/s13058-020-01354-y
pmc: PMC7607628
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aminopyridines
0
Morpholines
0
NVP-BKM120
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
EC 2.7.1.137
PIK3CA protein, human
EC 2.7.1.137
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01790932', 'NCT01629615']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
120Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA210184
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA168504
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : Program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation
ID : SU2C-AACR-DT0209
Pays : International
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R35 CA197588
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R03 NS050840
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R35 CA197588
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R50 CA221675
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U54 U54CA210184
Pays : United States
Références
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2108-2121
pubmed: 30345906
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 5;21(1):78
pubmed: 31277699
Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):61-70
pubmed: 23000897
Ann Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):313-320
pubmed: 27803006
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):289-297
pubmed: 29153866
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):904-916
pubmed: 28576675
Invest New Drugs. 2014 Aug;32(4):670-81
pubmed: 24652201
Cancer. 2008 Nov 15;113(10):2638-45
pubmed: 18833576
Cancer. 2012 Nov 15;118(22):5463-72
pubmed: 22544643
Cancer Discov. 2016 Feb;6(2):202-16
pubmed: 26645196
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 15;18(6):1777-89
pubmed: 22422409
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Jan;15(1):7-24
pubmed: 25533673
Cancer Cell. 2009 Aug 4;16(2):115-25
pubmed: 19647222
Cancer Discov. 2012 Nov;2(11):1048-63
pubmed: 22915751
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):e184475
pubmed: 30543347
Cancer. 2007 May 1;109(9):1721-8
pubmed: 17387718
Clin Breast Cancer. 2009 Feb;9(1):29-33
pubmed: 19299237
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Jul;134(7):e48-72
pubmed: 20586616
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Feb;138(2):241-56
pubmed: 24099077
Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(6):R101
pubmed: 19055754
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 2;377(18):1792-3
pubmed: 29091556
Nature. 2015 Feb 12;518(7538):240-4
pubmed: 25409150
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 20;30(3):282-90
pubmed: 22162589
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 May;115(2):423-8
pubmed: 18543098
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 15;20(14):3870-83
pubmed: 24895461
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 17;8(1):10784
pubmed: 30018387
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 1;26(11):2565-2572
pubmed: 32019858
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014 Feb;13(2):140-56
pubmed: 24481312
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):423-433
pubmed: 31841354
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jul 31;5(196):196ra99
pubmed: 23903756
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Cell. 2018 Apr 5;173(2):321-337.e10
pubmed: 29625050
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):87-100
pubmed: 29223745
Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):512-518
pubmed: 27993796
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 23;379(8):753-763
pubmed: 30110579
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1360-1372
pubmed: 28800861
J Mol Diagn. 2015 May;17(3):251-64
pubmed: 25801821