STrengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies: Development of the STROPS guideline.


Journal

PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2020
Historique:
entrez: 21 9 2020
pubmed: 22 9 2020
medline: 21 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Large sample sizes are often required to detect statistically significant associations between pharmacogenetic markers and treatment response. Meta-analysis may be performed to synthesize data from several studies, increasing sample size and, consequently, power to detect significant genetic effects. However, performing robust synthesis of data from pharmacogenetic studies is often challenging because of poor reporting of key data in study reports. There is currently no guideline for the reporting of pharmacogenetic studies that has been developed using a widely accepted robust methodology. The objective of this project was to develop the STrengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies (STROPS) guideline. We established a preliminary checklist of reporting items to be considered for inclusion in the guideline. We invited representatives of key stakeholder groups to participate in a 2-round Delphi survey. A total of 52 individuals participated in both rounds of the survey, scoring items with regards to their importance for inclusion in the STROPS guideline. We then held a consensus meeting, at which 8 individuals considered the results of the Delphi survey and voted on whether each item ought to be included in the final guideline. The STROPS guideline consists of 54 items and is accompanied by an explanation and elaboration document. The guideline contains items that are particularly important in the field of pharmacogenetics, such as the drug regimen of interest and whether adherence to treatment was accounted for in the conducted analyses. The guideline also requires that outcomes be clearly defined and justified, because in pharmacogenetic studies, there may be a greater number of possible outcomes than in other types of study (for example, disease-gene association studies). A limitation of this project is that our consensus meeting involved a small number of individuals, the majority of whom are based in the United Kingdom. Our aim is for the STROPS guideline to improve the transparency of reporting of pharmacogenetic studies and also to facilitate the conduct of high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We encourage authors to adhere to the STROPS guideline when publishing pharmacogenetic studies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Large sample sizes are often required to detect statistically significant associations between pharmacogenetic markers and treatment response. Meta-analysis may be performed to synthesize data from several studies, increasing sample size and, consequently, power to detect significant genetic effects. However, performing robust synthesis of data from pharmacogenetic studies is often challenging because of poor reporting of key data in study reports. There is currently no guideline for the reporting of pharmacogenetic studies that has been developed using a widely accepted robust methodology. The objective of this project was to develop the STrengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies (STROPS) guideline.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
We established a preliminary checklist of reporting items to be considered for inclusion in the guideline. We invited representatives of key stakeholder groups to participate in a 2-round Delphi survey. A total of 52 individuals participated in both rounds of the survey, scoring items with regards to their importance for inclusion in the STROPS guideline. We then held a consensus meeting, at which 8 individuals considered the results of the Delphi survey and voted on whether each item ought to be included in the final guideline. The STROPS guideline consists of 54 items and is accompanied by an explanation and elaboration document. The guideline contains items that are particularly important in the field of pharmacogenetics, such as the drug regimen of interest and whether adherence to treatment was accounted for in the conducted analyses. The guideline also requires that outcomes be clearly defined and justified, because in pharmacogenetic studies, there may be a greater number of possible outcomes than in other types of study (for example, disease-gene association studies). A limitation of this project is that our consensus meeting involved a small number of individuals, the majority of whom are based in the United Kingdom.
CONCLUSIONS
Our aim is for the STROPS guideline to improve the transparency of reporting of pharmacogenetic studies and also to facilitate the conduct of high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We encourage authors to adhere to the STROPS guideline when publishing pharmacogenetic studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32956352
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003344
pii: PMEDICINE-D-20-02535
pmc: PMC7505422
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1003344

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Hum Genet. 2009 Mar;125(2):131-51
pubmed: 19184668
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Feb;97(2):116-9
pubmed: 25670512
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7
pubmed: 17938396
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jan;105(1):86-91
pubmed: 30406943
Trials. 2012 Aug 06;13:132
pubmed: 22867278
PLoS Med. 2011 Mar;8(3):e1000420
pubmed: 21423587
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):395-400
pubmed: 21194891
Stat Med. 2008 Dec 30;27(30):6547-69
pubmed: 18837075
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 11;9(7):e030212
pubmed: 31300508

Auteurs

Marty Chaplin (M)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Jamie J Kirkham (JJ)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Centre for Biostatistics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Kerry Dwan (K)

Cochrane Editorial Unit, London, United Kingdom.

Derek J Sloan (DJ)

School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.

Geraint Davies (G)

Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Andrea L Jorgensen (AL)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH