Does including machine learning predictions in ALS clinical trial analysis improve statistical power?
Journal
Annals of clinical and translational neurology
ISSN: 2328-9503
Titre abrégé: Ann Clin Transl Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101623278
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
10
04
2020
revised:
30
06
2020
accepted:
30
06
2020
pubmed:
31
8
2020
medline:
18
8
2021
entrez:
31
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease which leads to progressive muscle weakness and eventually death. The increasing availability of large ALS clinical trial datasets have generated much interest in developing predictive models for disease progression. However, the utility of predictive modeling on clinical trial analysis has not been thoroughly evaluated. We evaluated a predictive modeling approach for ALS disease progression measured by ALSFRS-R using the PRO-ACT database and validated our findings in a novel test set from a former clinical trial. We examined clinical trial scenarios where model predictions could improve statistical power for detecting treatment effects with simulated clinical trials. Models constructed with imputed PRO-ACT data have better external validation results than those fitted with complete observations. When fitted with imputed data, super learner (R Predictive modeling approaches for ALSFRS-R are able to explain a moderate amount of variability in longitudinal change, which is improved by robust missing data handling for baseline characteristics. Including ALSFRS-R post-baseline model prediction results as a covariate in the model for primary analysis may increase power under moderate treatment effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32862509
doi: 10.1002/acn3.51140
pmc: PMC7545604
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1756-1765Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
Références
Neurology. 2014 Nov 4;83(19):1719-25
pubmed: 25298304
J Neurol Sci. 1999 Oct 31;169(1-2):13-21
pubmed: 10540002
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 01;3(8):
pubmed: 23906948
Eur J Neurol. 2014 Mar;21(3):529-36
pubmed: 24447620
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2007;6:Article25
pubmed: 17910531
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Mar 09;5(4):474-485
pubmed: 29687024
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016 Sep 07;3(11):866-875
pubmed: 27844032
Lancet. 1996 May 25;347(9013):1425-31
pubmed: 8676624
Lancet Neurol. 2018 May;17(5):423-433
pubmed: 29598923
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jul;16(7):505-512
pubmed: 28522181
Neurology. 2019 Jan 9;:
pubmed: 30626653
Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Nov;10(11):661-70
pubmed: 25311585
Neurotherapeutics. 2015 Apr;12(2):417-23
pubmed: 25613183
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jan 1;28(1):112-8
pubmed: 22039212