Prognosis of selected triple negative apocrine breast cancer patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.


Journal

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 06 04 2020
revised: 25 06 2020
accepted: 08 07 2020
pubmed: 17 8 2020
medline: 30 6 2021
entrez: 16 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Triple negative breast cancer encompasses several biological entities with different outcomes and is a priority to identify which patients require more treatment to reduce the risk of recurrence and which patients need less treatment. Among the 210 women with first primary invasive apocrine non metastatic breast cancer operated on between January 1998 and December 2016 at the European Institute Oncology, Milan, we identified 24 patients with a pT1-pT2, node-negative, triple negative subtype and Ki-67 ≤ 20% who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). We compared the outcome of this cohort with a similar group of 24 patients with ductal tumors who received adjuvant chemotherapy, matched by pathological stage and biological features and also with a similar group of 12 patients with apocrine tumors who received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median age was 64 and 61 years in the apocrine (w/o CT) and ductal group, respectively. The median value of Ki-67 expression was 12% in the apocrine group (w/o CT) and 16% in the ductal group (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 7.5 years, no patients in the apocrine group (w/o CT) experienced a breast cancer related event compared with 4 events in the ductal carcinoma group (Gray test p-value = 0.11). The outcome of selected apocrine triple negative breast cancer patients who did not received adjuvant chemotherapy is excellent and supports a treatment de-escalation. Multicenter projects focusing on the possibility of avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy in selected subtypes of triple negative breast cancers with favorable outcome are warranted.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Triple negative breast cancer encompasses several biological entities with different outcomes and is a priority to identify which patients require more treatment to reduce the risk of recurrence and which patients need less treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
Among the 210 women with first primary invasive apocrine non metastatic breast cancer operated on between January 1998 and December 2016 at the European Institute Oncology, Milan, we identified 24 patients with a pT1-pT2, node-negative, triple negative subtype and Ki-67 ≤ 20% who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). We compared the outcome of this cohort with a similar group of 24 patients with ductal tumors who received adjuvant chemotherapy, matched by pathological stage and biological features and also with a similar group of 12 patients with apocrine tumors who received adjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS RESULTS
The median age was 64 and 61 years in the apocrine (w/o CT) and ductal group, respectively. The median value of Ki-67 expression was 12% in the apocrine group (w/o CT) and 16% in the ductal group (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 7.5 years, no patients in the apocrine group (w/o CT) experienced a breast cancer related event compared with 4 events in the ductal carcinoma group (Gray test p-value = 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The outcome of selected apocrine triple negative breast cancer patients who did not received adjuvant chemotherapy is excellent and supports a treatment de-escalation. Multicenter projects focusing on the possibility of avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy in selected subtypes of triple negative breast cancers with favorable outcome are warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32795829
pii: S0960-9776(20)30145-4
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.07.003
pmc: PMC7424227
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Ki-67 Antigen 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

138-142

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest Emilia Montagna and Giuseppe Cancello received a honorarium for consultant/advisory role from Pierre Fabre. Elisabetta Munzone received a honorarium for consultant/advisory role from Pierre Fabre and Genomic health. Giuseppe Viale has received a honorarium for consultant/advisory role from Dako, Roche, Astellas Pharma, Novartis and he has received funding from Roche, Ventane, Dako. Marco Colleoni has received a honorarium for consultant/advisory role from Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Obi-Pharma, Puba biotechnology, Celldex, Astrazeneca. Eleonora Pagan, Vincenzo Bagnardi, Silvia Dellapasqua, Monica Iorfida, Manueliata Mazza, Giovanni Mazzarol, Paolo Veronesi, Viviana Galimberti, Giorgia Santomauro have no conflict of interest.

Références

Oncogene. 2005 Jul 7;24(29):4660-71
pubmed: 15897907
Am J Surg Pathol. 2003 Jun;27(6):832-5
pubmed: 12766589
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec;6(12):718-30
pubmed: 19942925
Clin Breast Cancer. 2013 Feb;13(1):31-9
pubmed: 23098574
Oncogene. 2012 Mar 1;31(9):1196-206
pubmed: 21785460
Breast. 2005 Feb;14(1):3-10
pubmed: 15695074
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Aug;40(8):1109-16
pubmed: 27259012
Clin Breast Cancer. 2013 Apr;13(2):95-102
pubmed: 23245877
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 May;42(5):375-86
pubmed: 22450930
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Nov;88(1):49-54
pubmed: 15538045
Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Sep;20(7):1071-82
pubmed: 19343511
Curr Opin Oncol. 2011 Nov;23(6):566-77
pubmed: 21986848
Am J Pathol. 1986 Jun;123(3):532-41
pubmed: 3717305
Ann Oncol. 2009 Nov;20(11):1763-70
pubmed: 19602565
Br J Cancer. 2019 Apr;120(9):913-921
pubmed: 30899086
Am J Clin Pathol. 2000 May;113(suppl_1):S3-18
pubmed: 11993707

Auteurs

Emilia Montagna (E)

Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: emilia.montagna@ieo.it.

Giuseppe Cancello (G)

Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Eleonora Pagan (E)

Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Vincenzo Bagnardi (V)

Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Elisabetta Munzone (E)

Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Silvia Dellapasqua (S)

Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Giuseppe Viale (G)

Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Giovanni Mazzarol (G)

Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Paolo Veronesi (P)

Division of Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Viviana Galimberti (V)

Division of Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Giorgia Santomauro (G)

Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Marco Colleoni (M)

Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH