A drive for structure: A longitudinal qualitative study of the implementation of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) intervention during hospital discharge at end of life.
Caregivers
implementation science
needs assessment
palliative care
patient discharge
qualitative research
terminal care
Journal
Palliative medicine
ISSN: 1477-030X
Titre abrégé: Palliat Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704926
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
4
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Informal carers are essential in enabling discharge home from hospital at end of life and supporting palliative patients at home, but are often ill-prepared for the role. Carers' support needs are rarely considered at discharge. If carers are less able to cope with home care, patient care may suffer and readmission may become more likely. To investigate the implementation of an evidence-based Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) intervention to support carers during hospital discharge at end of life. Longitudinal qualitative study with thematic analysis. One National Health Service Trust in England: 12 hospital practitioners, one hospital administrator and four community practitioners. We provided training in CSNAT intervention use and implementation. Practitioners delivered the intervention for 6 months. Data collection was conducted in three phases: (1) pre-implementation interviews exploring understandings, anticipated benefits and challenges of the intervention; (2) observations of team meetings and review of intervention procedures and (3) follow-up interviews exploring experiences of working with the intervention. Despite efforts from practitioners, implementation was challenging. Three main themes captured facilitators and barriers to implementation: (1) structure and focus within carer support; (2) the 'right' people to implement the intervention and (3) practical implementation challenges. Structure and focus may facilitate implementation, but the dominance of outcomes measurement and performance metrics in health systems may powerfully frame perceptions of the intervention and implementation decisions. There is uncertainty over who is best-placed or responsible for supporting carers around hospital discharge, and challenges in connecting with carers prior to discharge.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Informal carers are essential in enabling discharge home from hospital at end of life and supporting palliative patients at home, but are often ill-prepared for the role. Carers' support needs are rarely considered at discharge. If carers are less able to cope with home care, patient care may suffer and readmission may become more likely.
AIM
To investigate the implementation of an evidence-based Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) intervention to support carers during hospital discharge at end of life.
DESIGN
Longitudinal qualitative study with thematic analysis.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS
One National Health Service Trust in England: 12 hospital practitioners, one hospital administrator and four community practitioners. We provided training in CSNAT intervention use and implementation. Practitioners delivered the intervention for 6 months. Data collection was conducted in three phases: (1) pre-implementation interviews exploring understandings, anticipated benefits and challenges of the intervention; (2) observations of team meetings and review of intervention procedures and (3) follow-up interviews exploring experiences of working with the intervention.
RESULTS
Despite efforts from practitioners, implementation was challenging. Three main themes captured facilitators and barriers to implementation: (1) structure and focus within carer support; (2) the 'right' people to implement the intervention and (3) practical implementation challenges.
CONCLUSIONS
Structure and focus may facilitate implementation, but the dominance of outcomes measurement and performance metrics in health systems may powerfully frame perceptions of the intervention and implementation decisions. There is uncertainty over who is best-placed or responsible for supporting carers around hospital discharge, and challenges in connecting with carers prior to discharge.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32491967
doi: 10.1177/0269216320930935
pmc: PMC7388143
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1088-1096Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Dec;64:32-41
pubmed: 27684320
Palliat Med. 2013 Mar;27(3):244-56
pubmed: 22450160
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Dec;64:1-12
pubmed: 27657662
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2018 Oct;15(5):377-385
pubmed: 30152150
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):587-92
pubmed: 23159157
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;7(3):326-334
pubmed: 26719349
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1159-67
pubmed: 21343566
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep;46(3):395-405
pubmed: 23245452
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 01;19(11):e367
pubmed: 29092808
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Sep;72(9):2162-72
pubmed: 27113470
Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;31(4):346-355
pubmed: 28281406
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 07;10(4):e0123012
pubmed: 25849348
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Dec 20;17(1):129
pubmed: 30572859
BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Feb 15;12:7
pubmed: 23414145
Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;32(10):1605-1614
pubmed: 30130458
Br J Community Nurs. 2015 Dec;20(12):580-4
pubmed: 26636891
Age Ageing. 2018 May 01;47(3):374-380
pubmed: 29370339
Palliat Med. 2018 May;32(5):939-949
pubmed: 29490198
Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):329-336
pubmed: 29017018
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Mar 1;17(1):39
pubmed: 29490657
BMJ. 2006 Mar 4;332(7540):515-21
pubmed: 16467346