Accuracy of detecting residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (preSINO trial): a prospective multicenter diagnostic cohort study.
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
Chemoradiotherapy
/ methods
Data Accuracy
Endoscopy
/ methods
Endosonography
/ methods
Esophageal Neoplasms
/ pathology
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
/ pathology
Esophagectomy
Esophagus
/ pathology
Humans
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ methods
Neoplasm, Residual
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
/ methods
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Accuracy
Active surveillance
Esophageal cancer
Esophagectomy
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Organ-sparing
Residual disease
Response
Sensitivity
Squamous cell carcinoma
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Mar 2020
06 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
15
07
2019
accepted:
21
02
2020
entrez:
8
3
2020
pubmed:
8
3
2020
medline:
25
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer, high pathologically complete response (pCR) rates are being achieved especially in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). An active surveillance strategy has been proposed for SCC patients with clinically complete response (cCR) after nCRT. To justify omitting surgical resection, patients with residual disease should be accurately identified. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of response evaluations after nCRT based on the preSANO trial, including positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT), endoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in patients with potentially curable esophageal SCC. Operable esophageal SCC patients who are planned to undergo nCRT according to the CROSS regimen and are planned to undergo surgery will be recruited from four Asian centers. Four to 6 weeks after completion of nCRT, patients will undergo a first clinical response evaluation (CRE-1) consisting of endoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies. In patients without histological evidence of residual tumor (i.e. without positive biopsies), surgery will be postponed another 6 weeks. A second clinical response evaluation (CRE-2) will be performed 10-12 weeks after completion of nCRT, consisting of PET-CT, endoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies and EUS with FNA. Immediately after CRE-2 all patients without evidence of distant metastases will undergo esophagectomy. Results of CRE-1 and CRE-2 as well as results of the three single diagnostic modalities will be correlated to pathological response in the resection specimen (gold standard) for calculation of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value. If the current study shows that major locoregional residual disease (> 10% residual carcinoma or any residual nodal disease) can be accurately (i.e. with sensitivity of 80.5%) detected in patients with esophageal SCC, a prospective trial will be conducted comparing active surveillance with standard esophagectomy in patients with a clinically complete response after nCRT (SINO trial). The preSINO trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03937362 (May 3, 2019).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer, high pathologically complete response (pCR) rates are being achieved especially in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). An active surveillance strategy has been proposed for SCC patients with clinically complete response (cCR) after nCRT. To justify omitting surgical resection, patients with residual disease should be accurately identified. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of response evaluations after nCRT based on the preSANO trial, including positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT), endoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in patients with potentially curable esophageal SCC.
METHODS
METHODS
Operable esophageal SCC patients who are planned to undergo nCRT according to the CROSS regimen and are planned to undergo surgery will be recruited from four Asian centers. Four to 6 weeks after completion of nCRT, patients will undergo a first clinical response evaluation (CRE-1) consisting of endoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies. In patients without histological evidence of residual tumor (i.e. without positive biopsies), surgery will be postponed another 6 weeks. A second clinical response evaluation (CRE-2) will be performed 10-12 weeks after completion of nCRT, consisting of PET-CT, endoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies and EUS with FNA. Immediately after CRE-2 all patients without evidence of distant metastases will undergo esophagectomy. Results of CRE-1 and CRE-2 as well as results of the three single diagnostic modalities will be correlated to pathological response in the resection specimen (gold standard) for calculation of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
If the current study shows that major locoregional residual disease (> 10% residual carcinoma or any residual nodal disease) can be accurately (i.e. with sensitivity of 80.5%) detected in patients with esophageal SCC, a prospective trial will be conducted comparing active surveillance with standard esophagectomy in patients with a clinically complete response after nCRT (SINO trial).
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
The preSINO trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03937362 (May 3, 2019).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32143580
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6669-y
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-6669-y
pmc: PMC7060643
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03937362']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
194Subventions
Organisme : Shanghai Chest Hospital
ID : YJXT20190202
Références
Cancer Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;37(1):E44-50
pubmed: 23448956
Gastroenterology. 2020 Feb;158(3):494-505.e6
pubmed: 31711920
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Sep 15;22(18):3805-12
pubmed: 15365078
Br J Surg. 2019 Apr;106(5):596-605
pubmed: 30802305
J Nucl Med. 2019 Nov;60(11):1553-1559
pubmed: 30877177
Ann Surg. 2013 Nov;258(5):678-88; discussion 688-9
pubmed: 24096766
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 May;101(5):1897-902
pubmed: 26912307
BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 6;18(1):142
pubmed: 29409469
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1114-21
pubmed: 20304399
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;90(3):884-90; discussion 890-1
pubmed: 20732513
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jan 1;53(1):201-208
pubmed: 28977486
Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):356-362
pubmed: 28059964
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Sep;43(14):2066-73
pubmed: 17702567
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):965-974
pubmed: 29861116
Dig Surg. 2019;36(6):462-469
pubmed: 30227434
Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1717-27
pubmed: 23184421
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
Cancer. 2005 Apr 1;103(7):1347-55
pubmed: 15719440
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):786-92; discussion 792-3
pubmed: 25379850
Gut. 2015 Mar;64(3):381-7
pubmed: 25320104
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct - Dec;36-37:37-44
pubmed: 30551855
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Oct;9(5):880-886
pubmed: 30505590
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Jun 29;4(2):e79
pubmed: 26121676
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2796-2803
pubmed: 30089078
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jan;142:17-26
pubmed: 31431376
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098
pubmed: 26254683
Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Aug;2(8):563-72
pubmed: 12154349
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jul 8;67(4):304-317
pubmed: 28556024
Ann Surg. 2008 Oct;248(4):549-56
pubmed: 18936567
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84
pubmed: 22646630
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):328-54
pubmed: 25452219