Antimicrobial use among adult inpatients at hospital sites within the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program: 2009 to 2016.
Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination
/ therapeutic use
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Antimicrobial Stewardship
Bacterial Infections
/ drug therapy
Canada
Ceftriaxone
/ therapeutic use
Cross Infection
/ drug therapy
Drug Resistance
Fluoroquinolones
/ therapeutic use
Hospitals
Humans
Inpatients
Retrospective Studies
Antimicrobial use
Hospital
Surveillance
Journal
Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
ISSN: 2047-2994
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 02 2020
13 02 2020
Historique:
received:
25
10
2019
accepted:
23
01
2020
entrez:
15
2
2020
pubmed:
15
2
2020
medline:
30
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antimicrobial resistance is a growing threat to the world's ability to prevent and treat infections. Links between quantitative antibiotic use and the emergence of bacterial resistance are well documented. This study presents benchmark antimicrobial use (AMU) rates for inpatient adult populations in acute-care hospitals across Canada. In this retrospective surveillance study, acute-care adult hospitals participating in the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP) submitted annual AMU data on all systemic antimicrobials from 2009 to 2016. Information specific to intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICU wards were available for 2014-2016. Data were analyzed using defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 patient days (DDD/1000pd). Between 2009 and 2016, 16-18 CNISP adult hospitals participated each year and provided their AMU data (22 hospitals participated in ≥1 year of surveillance; 11 in all years). From 2009 to 2016, there was a significant reduction in use (12%) (from 654 to 573 DDD/1000pd, p = 0.03). Fluoroquinolones accounted for the majority of this decrease (47% reduction in combined oral and intravenous use, from 129 to 68 DDD/1000pd, p < 0.002). The top five antimicrobials used in 2016 were cefazolin (78 DDD/1000pd), piperacillin-tazobactam (53 DDD/1000pd), ceftriaxone (49 DDD/1000pd), vancomycin (combined oral and intravenous use was 44 DDD/1000pd; 7% of vancomycin use was oral), and ciprofloxacin (combined oral and intravenous use: 42 DDD/1000pd). Among the top 10 antimicrobials used in 2016, ciprofloxacin and metronidazole use decreased significantly between 2009 and 2016 by 46% (p = 0.002) and 26% (p = 0.002) respectively. Ceftriaxone (85% increase, p = 0.0008) and oral amoxicillin-clavulanate (140% increase, p < 0.0001) use increased significantly but contributed only a small component (8.6 and 5.0%, respectively) of overall use. This study represents the largest collection of dispensed antimicrobial use data among inpatients in Canada to date. Between 2009 and 2016, there was a significant 12% decrease in AMU, driven primarily by a 47% decrease in fluoroquinolone use. Modest absolute increases in parenteral ceftriaxone and oral amoxicillin-clavulanate use were noted but contributed a small amount of total AMU. Ongoing national surveillance is crucial for establishing benchmarks and antimicrobial stewardship guidelines.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Antimicrobial resistance is a growing threat to the world's ability to prevent and treat infections. Links between quantitative antibiotic use and the emergence of bacterial resistance are well documented. This study presents benchmark antimicrobial use (AMU) rates for inpatient adult populations in acute-care hospitals across Canada.
METHODS
In this retrospective surveillance study, acute-care adult hospitals participating in the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP) submitted annual AMU data on all systemic antimicrobials from 2009 to 2016. Information specific to intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICU wards were available for 2014-2016. Data were analyzed using defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 patient days (DDD/1000pd).
RESULTS
Between 2009 and 2016, 16-18 CNISP adult hospitals participated each year and provided their AMU data (22 hospitals participated in ≥1 year of surveillance; 11 in all years). From 2009 to 2016, there was a significant reduction in use (12%) (from 654 to 573 DDD/1000pd, p = 0.03). Fluoroquinolones accounted for the majority of this decrease (47% reduction in combined oral and intravenous use, from 129 to 68 DDD/1000pd, p < 0.002). The top five antimicrobials used in 2016 were cefazolin (78 DDD/1000pd), piperacillin-tazobactam (53 DDD/1000pd), ceftriaxone (49 DDD/1000pd), vancomycin (combined oral and intravenous use was 44 DDD/1000pd; 7% of vancomycin use was oral), and ciprofloxacin (combined oral and intravenous use: 42 DDD/1000pd). Among the top 10 antimicrobials used in 2016, ciprofloxacin and metronidazole use decreased significantly between 2009 and 2016 by 46% (p = 0.002) and 26% (p = 0.002) respectively. Ceftriaxone (85% increase, p = 0.0008) and oral amoxicillin-clavulanate (140% increase, p < 0.0001) use increased significantly but contributed only a small component (8.6 and 5.0%, respectively) of overall use.
CONCLUSIONS
This study represents the largest collection of dispensed antimicrobial use data among inpatients in Canada to date. Between 2009 and 2016, there was a significant 12% decrease in AMU, driven primarily by a 47% decrease in fluoroquinolone use. Modest absolute increases in parenteral ceftriaxone and oral amoxicillin-clavulanate use were noted but contributed a small amount of total AMU. Ongoing national surveillance is crucial for establishing benchmarks and antimicrobial stewardship guidelines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32054539
doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-0684-2
pii: 10.1186/s13756-020-0684-2
pmc: PMC7020554
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Fluoroquinolones
0
Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination
74469-00-4
Ceftriaxone
75J73V1629
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
32Subventions
Organisme : The Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada. This work did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
ID : .
Pays : International
Références
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011 Sep;35(5):977-91
pubmed: 21722146
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44(5):664-70
pubmed: 17278056
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Aug 15;41(4):435-40
pubmed: 16028149
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 29;65(12):1992-1999
pubmed: 29020166
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 May;61(5):585-91
pubmed: 16669851
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 May;68 Suppl 1:i39-46
pubmed: 23587777
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;17(2):194-206
pubmed: 27825595
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;26(2):175-83
pubmed: 15756889
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 1;36(5):592-8
pubmed: 12594640
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jan 1;36(1):53-9
pubmed: 12491202
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Jul;46(7):824-836
pubmed: 29472107
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Apr;67(4):1010-5
pubmed: 22240401
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 15;63(10):1273-1280
pubmed: 27694483
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;30(3):264-72
pubmed: 19215193
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Sep 1;45 Suppl 2:S112-21
pubmed: 17683015
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Jun;22(6):561.e7-561.e19
pubmed: 26899826
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;17(4):411-421
pubmed: 28130063
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Sep;56(9):4833-7
pubmed: 22751533
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 15;44(2):159-77
pubmed: 17173212
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2442-9
pubmed: 16322602
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;36(6):688-94
pubmed: 25817577
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jul;70(7):2133-43
pubmed: 25900159
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jun;78(2):118-22
pubmed: 21497946
CMAJ. 2018 Jun 25;190(25):E758-E765
pubmed: 29941432
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2015 Mar-Apr;26(2):85-9
pubmed: 26015790
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Feb;72(2):554-563
pubmed: 27856724
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2017 Nov 02;43(11):217-219
pubmed: 29770049