Evaluation of measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments for burns: A systematic review.
Journal
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
24
1
2020
medline:
28
8
2020
entrez:
24
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a key outcome in the evaluation of burn treatment. Health-related quality of life instruments with robust measurement properties are required to provide high-quality evidence to improve patient care. The aim of this review was to critically appraise the measurement properties of HRQL instruments used in burns. A systematic search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google scholar to reveal articles on the development and/or validation of HRQL instruments in burns. Measurement properties were assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments methodology. A modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation analysis was used to assess risk of bias (prospero ID, CRD42016048065). Forty-three articles covering 15 HRQL instruments (12 disease-specific and 3 generic instruments) were included. Methodological quality and evidence on measurement properties varied widely. None of the instruments provided enough evidence on their measurement properties to be highly recommended for routine use; however, two instruments had somewhat more favorable measurement properties. The Burn-Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) is easy to use, widely accessible, and demonstrated sufficient evidence for most measurement properties. The Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profiles were the only instruments with high-quality evidence for content validity. The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (burn-specific HRQL) and the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (burn scar HRQL) instruments have the best measurement properties. There is only weak evidence on the measurement properties of generic HRQL instruments in burn patients. Results of this study form important input to reach consensus on a universally used instrument to assess HRQL in burn patients. Systematic review, level III.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a key outcome in the evaluation of burn treatment. Health-related quality of life instruments with robust measurement properties are required to provide high-quality evidence to improve patient care. The aim of this review was to critically appraise the measurement properties of HRQL instruments used in burns.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google scholar to reveal articles on the development and/or validation of HRQL instruments in burns. Measurement properties were assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments methodology. A modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation analysis was used to assess risk of bias (prospero ID, CRD42016048065).
RESULTS
Forty-three articles covering 15 HRQL instruments (12 disease-specific and 3 generic instruments) were included. Methodological quality and evidence on measurement properties varied widely. None of the instruments provided enough evidence on their measurement properties to be highly recommended for routine use; however, two instruments had somewhat more favorable measurement properties. The Burn-Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) is easy to use, widely accessible, and demonstrated sufficient evidence for most measurement properties. The Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profiles were the only instruments with high-quality evidence for content validity.
CONCLUSION
The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (burn-specific HRQL) and the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (burn scar HRQL) instruments have the best measurement properties. There is only weak evidence on the measurement properties of generic HRQL instruments in burn patients. Results of this study form important input to reach consensus on a universally used instrument to assess HRQL in burn patients.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Systematic review, level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31972752
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002584
pii: 01586154-202004000-00011
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
555-571Références
Brusselaers N, Hoste EA, Monstrey S, Colpaert KE, De Waele JJ, Vandewoude KH, Blot SI. Outcome and changes over time in survival following severe burns from 1985 to 2004. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(12):1648–1653.
Bloemsma GC, Dokter J, Boxma H, Oen IM. Mortality and causes of death in a burn centre. Burns. 2008;34(8):1103–1107.
Tompkins RG. Survival from burns in the new millennium: 70 years' experience from a single institution. Ann Surg. 2015;261(2):263–268.
van Baar ME, Essink-Bot ML, Oen IM, Dokter J, Boxma H, van Beeck EF. Functional outcome after burns: a review. Burns. 2006;32(1):1–9.
Pereira C, Murphy K, Herndon D. Outcome measures in burn care. Is mortality dead? Burns. 2004;30(8):761–771.
Klein MB, Goverman J, Hayden DL, et al. Benchmarking outcomes in the critically injured burn patient. Ann Surg. 2014;259(5):833–841.
Stavrou D, Weissman O, Tessone A, Zilinsky I, Holloway S, Boyd J, Haik J. Health related quality of life in burn patients–a review of the literature. Burns. 2014;40(5):788–796.
Spronk I, Legemate C, Oen I, van Loey N, Polinder S, van Baar M. Health related quality of life in adults after burn injuries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0197507.
Guyatt GHJR, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measurements in clinical trials: choosing the right approach. In: Spilker B, ed. 2nd ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Rave; 1996.
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157.
Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, Terwee CB. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171–1179.
Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, Westerman MJ, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, Mokkink LB. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159–1170.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
Kool MB, Geenen R, Egberts MR, Wanders H, Van Loey NE. Patients' perspectives on quality of life after burn. Burns. 2017;43(4):747–756.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.
Meirte J, Van Daele U, Maertens K, Moortgat P, Deleus R, Van Loey NE. Convergent and discriminant validity of quality of life measures used in burn populations. Burns. 2017;43(1):84–92.
Spronk I, Legemate CM, Dokter J, van Loey NEE, van Baar ME, Polinder S. Predictors of health-related quality of life after burn injuries: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):160.
Tyack Z, Ziviani J, Kimble R, Plaza A, Jones A, Cuttle L, Simons M. Measuring the impact of burn scarring on health-related quality of life: development and preliminary content validation of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) for children and adults. Burns. 2015;41(7):1405–1419.
Tyack Z, Kimble R, McPhail S, Plaza A, Simons M. Psychometric properties of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile in adults with burn scars. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184452.
Kazis LE, Liang MH, Lee A, et al. The development, validation, and testing of a health outcomes burn questionnaire for infants and children 5 years of age and younger: American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002;23(3):196–207.
van Baar ME, Essink-Bot ML, Oen IM, Dokter J, Boxma H, Hinson MI, van Loey NE, Faber AW, van Beeck EF. Reliability and validity of the Health Outcomes Burn Questionnaire for infants and children in the Netherlands. Burns. 2006;32(3):357–365.
Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Phillips CB, et al. American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children burn outcomes questionnaire: construction and psychometric properties. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2000;21(1 Pt 1):29–39.
van Baar ME, Essink-Bot ML, Oen IM, Dokter J, Boxma H, Hinson MI, van Loey NE, Faber AW, van Beeck EF. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the American Burn Association/Shriners Hospital for Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (5-18 years of age). J Burn Care Res. 2006;27(6):790–802.
Sveen J, Huss F, Sjoberg F, Willebrand M. Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the burn outcomes questionnaire for children aged 5 to 18 years. J Burn Care Res. 2012;33(6):e286–e294.
Blades B, Mellis N, Munster AM. A burn specific health scale. J Trauma. 1982;22(10):872–875.
Adam M, Leblebici B, Tarim MA, Yildirim S, Bagis S, Akman MN, Haberal M. Validation of a Turkish version of the burn-specific health scale. J Burn Care Res. 2009;30(2):288–291. discussion 92-3.
Li DW, Liu WQ, Wang HM, Ying S, Cui L, Zhao FF. The Chinese language version of the abbreviated burn specific health scale: a validation study. Burns. 2014;40(5):1001–1006.
Moi AL, Wentzel-Larsen T, Salemark L, Hanestad B. Validation of a Norwegian version of the Burn Specific Health Scale. Burns. 2003;29(6):563–570.
Munster AM, Horowitz GL, Tudahl LA. The abbreviated Burn-Specific Health Scale. J Trauma. 1987;27(4):425–428.
Salvador Sanz JF, Sanchez-Paya J, Rodriguez Marin J. Spanish version of the Burn-Specific Health Scale. J Trauma. 1998;45(3):581–587.
Finlay V, Phillips M, Wood F, Hendrie D, Allison GT, Edgar D. Enhancing the clinical utility of the burn specific health scale-brief: not just for major burns. Burns. 2014;40(2):328–336.
Gandolfi S, Auquit-Auckbur I, Panunzi S, Mici E, Grolleau JL, Chaput B. Validation of the French version of the burn specific health scale-brief (BSHS-B) questionnaire. Burns. 2016;42(7):1573–1580.
Goudarzian AH, Taebei M, Soleimani A, Tahmasbi M, Ahmadi M, Madani MH. Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) in pregnant burned women: translation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version. Int J of Ped. 2017;5(7):5391–5400. DOI:10.22038/ijp.2017.24227.2041.
doi: 10.22038/ijp.2017.24227.2041
Hwang YF, Chen-Sea MJ, Chen CL, Hsieh CS. Validation of a Taiwanese version of the burn-specific health scale-brief. J Burn Care Res. 2016;37(4):e310–e316.
Kildal M, Andersson G, Fugl-Meyer AR, Lannerstam K, Gerdin B. Development of a brief version of the Burn Specific Health Scale (BSHS-B). J Trauma. 2001;51(4):740–746.
Ling-Juan Z, Jie C, Jian L, Xiao-Ying L, Ping F, Zhao-Fan X, Jian-Ling H, Juan H, Feng Z, Tao L. Development of quality of life scale in Chinese burn patients: cross-cultural adaptation process of burn-specific health scale — brief. Burns. 2012;38(8):1216–1223.
Mulay AM, Ahuja A, Ahuja RB. Modification, cultural adaptation and validation of burn specific health scale-brief (BSHS-B) for Hindi speaking population. Burns. 2015;41(7):1543–1549.
Muller A, Smits D, Jasper S, Berg L, Claes L, Ipaktchi R, Vogt PM, de Zwaan M. Validation of the German version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B). Burns. 2015;41(6):1333–1339.
Piccolo MS, Gragnani A, Daher RP, Scanavino Mde T, de Brito MJ, Ferreira LM. Validation of the Brazilian version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B-Br). Burns. 2015;41(7):1579–1586.
Pishnamazi Z, Rejeh N, Heravi-Karimooi M, Vaismoradi M. Validation of the Persian version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief. Burns. 2013;39(1):162–167.
Sideli L, Prestifilippo A, Di Benedetto B, Farrauto R, Grassia R, Mule A, Rumeo MV, Di Pasquale A, Conte F, La Barbera D. Quality of life, body image, and psychiatric complications in patients with a burn trauma: preliminary study of the Italian version of the burn specific health scale-brief. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2010;23(4):171–176.
Sideli L, Di Pasquale A, Prestifilippo A, Benigno A, Bartolotta A, Cirrincione CR, La Barbera D. Validation of the Italian version of the burn specific health scale-brief. Burns. 2014;40(5):995–1000.
Stampolidis N, Castana O, Nikiteas N, Vlasis K, Koupidis SA, Grammatikopoulos IA, Mantzari E, Pallantzas A, Kourakos P, Papadopoulos O. Quality of life in burn patients in Greece. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2012;25(4):192–195.
Stavrou D, Haik J, Wiser I, Winkler E, Liran A, Holloway S, Boyd J, Zilinsky I, Weissman O. Validation of the Hebrew version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief questionnaire. Burns. 2015;41(1):188–195.
Stolle A, Ripper S, Magdanz J, Honer B, Struckmann V, Kneser U, Harhaus L. Validation of the Ludwigshafen German version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief. J Burn Care Res. 2018;39(2):252–260.
Szczechowicz J, Lewandowski J, Sikorski J. Polish adaptation and validation of burn specific health scale - brief. Burns. 2014;40(5):1013–1018.
Van Loey NE, Van de Schoot R, Gerdin B, Faber AW, Sjoberg F, Willebrand M. The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief: measurement invariant across European countries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(5):1321–1326.
Willebrand M, Kildal M. A simplified domain structure of the burn-specific health scale-brief (BSHS-B): a tool to improve its value in routine clinical work. J Trauma. 2008;64(6):1581–1586.
Willebrand M, Kildal M. Burn specific health up to 24 months after the burn—a prospective validation of the simplified model of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief. J Trauma. 2011;71(1):78–84.
Blalock SJ, Bunker BJ, Moore JD, Foreman N, Walsh JF. The impact of burn injury: a preliminary investigation. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1992;13(4):487–492.
Blalock SJ, Bunker BJ, DeVellis RF. Measuring health status among survivors of burn injury: revisions of the Burn Specific Health Scale. J Trauma. 1994;36(4):508–515.
Ferreira E, Dantas RA, Rossi LA, Ciol MA. The cultural adaptation and validation of the “Burn Specific Health Scale-Revised” (BSHS-R): version for Brazilian burn victims. Burns. 2008;34(7):994–1001.
Nicolosi JT, de Carvalho VF, Sabates AL, Paggiaro AO. Assessment of health status of adolescent burn victims undergoing rehabilitation: a cross-sectional field study. Plast Surg Nurs. 2013;33(4):185–191.
Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)—a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(3):210–216.
Mazharinia N, Aghaei S, Shayan Z. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores in burn victims after revival. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28(2):312–317.
Oster C, Willebrand M, Dyster-Aas J, Kildal M, Ekselius L. Validation of the EQ-5D questionnaire in burn injured adults. Burns. 2009;35(5):723–732.
Landgraf JM, Vogel I, Oostenbrink R, van Baar ME, Raat H. Parent-reported health outcomes in infants/toddlers: measurement properties and clinical validity of the ITQOL-SF47. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(3):635–646.
Edgar D, Dawson A, Hankey G, Phillips M, Wood F. Demonstration of the validity of the SF-36 for measurement of the temporal recovery of quality of life outcomes in burns survivors. Burns. 2010;36(7):1013–1020.
Ryan CM, Schneider JC, Kazis LE, et al. Benchmarks for multidimensional recovery after burn injury in young adults: the development, validation, and testing of the American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children young adult burn outcome questionnaire. J Burn Care Res. 2013;34(3):e121–e142.
Chiarotto A, Terwee CB, Kamper SJ, Boers M, Ostelo RW. Evidence on the measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments is largely missing in patients with low back pain: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;102:23–37.
HealthActCHQ (HACHQ) Available at: https://www.healthactchq.com/survey/itqol. Accesed April 24, 2018.
Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cariney J. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford Medicine Online. January 2015. Oxford Universitiy Press.
Falder S, Browne A, Edgar D, Staples E, Fong J, Rea S, Wood F. Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: a clinical overview. Burns. 2009;35(5):618–641.
Griffiths C, Armstrong-James L, White P, Rumsey N, Pleat J, Harcourt D. A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in child and adolescent burn research. Burns. 2015;41(2):212–224.
Griffiths C, Guest E, White P, Gaskin E, Rumsey N, Pleat J, Harcourt D. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used in adult burn research. J Burn Care Res. 2017;38(2):e521–e545.
Young A, Brookes S, Rumsey N, Blazeby J. Agreement on what to measure in randomised controlled trials in burn care: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e017267.
Boers M, Kirwan JR, Wells G, et al. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(7):745–753.
Kazis LE, Marino M, Ni P, et al. Development of the life impact burn recovery evaluation (LIBRE) profile: assessing burn survivors' social participation. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(10):2851–2866.