SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention.
Arterial Occlusive Diseases
/ etiology
Benchmarking
Cardiac Catheterization
/ adverse effects
Catheterization, Peripheral
/ adverse effects
Consensus
Coronary Angiography
/ adverse effects
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Predictive Value of Tests
Radial Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ulnar Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Ultrasonography, Interventional
/ adverse effects
Vascular Patency
Vasoconstriction
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
06
12
2019
accepted:
12
12
2019
pubmed:
28
12
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
28
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Transradial angiography and intervention continues to become increasingly common as an access site for coronary procedures. Since the first "Best Practices" paper in 2013, ongoing trials have shed further light onto the safest and most efficient methods to perform these procedures. Specifically, this document comments on the use of ultrasound to facilitate radial access, the role of ulnar artery access, the utility of non-invasive testing of collateral flow, strategies to prevent radial artery occlusion, radial access for primary PCI and topics that require further study.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Practice Guideline
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
245-252Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Rao SV, Tremmel JA, Gilchrist IC, et al. Best practices for transradial angiography and intervention: a consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and intervention's transradial working group. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:228-236.
Abdelaal E, Brousseau-Provencher C, Montminy S, et al. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:1129-1137.
Chugh SK, Chugh S, Chugh Y, Rao SV. Feasibility and utility of pre-procedure ultrasound imaging of the arm to facilitate transradial coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures (PRIMAFACIE-TRI). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:64-73.
Seto AH, Roberts JS, Abu-Fadel MS, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (radial artery access with ultrasound trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:283-291.
Moussa Pacha H, Alahdab F, Al-Khadra Y, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided radial artery catheterization in adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2018;204:1-8.
Aptecar E, Pernes JM, Chabane-Chaouch M, et al. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67:711-720.
Hahalis G, Tsigkas G, Xanthopoulou I, et al. Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: a randomized trial: the transulnar or transradial instead of coronary transfemoral angiographies study (the AURA of ARTEMIS Study). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:252-261.
Geng W, Fu X, Gu X, et al. Safety and feasibility of transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary catheterization in non-selective patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127:1222-1228.
Liu J, Fu XH, Xue L, Wu WL, Gu XS, Li SQ. A comparative study of transulnar and transradial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27:525-530.
Gokhroo R, Kishor K, Ranwa B, et al. Ulnar artery interventions non-inferior to radial approach: AJmer Ulnar ARtery (AJULAR) intervention working group study results. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016;28:1-8.
Dahal K, Rijal J, Lee J, Korr KS, Azrin M. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:857-865.
Agostoni P, Zuffi A, Faurie B, et al. Same wrist intervention via the cubital (ulnar) artery in case of radial puncture failure for percutaneous cardiac catheterization or intervention: the multicenter SWITCH registry. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169:52-56.
Kedev S, Zafirovska B, Dharma S, Petkoska D. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:E51-E60.
Nuttall G, Burckhardt J, Hadley A, et al. Surgical and patient risk factors for severe arterial line complications in adults. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:590-597.
van Leeuwen MAH, Hollander MR, van der Heijden DJ, et al. The ACRA anatomy study (assessment of disability after coronary procedures using radial access): a comprehensive anatomic and functional assessment of the vasculature of the hand and relation to outcome after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e005753. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005753.
Barone JE, Madlinger RV. Should an Allen test be performed before radial artery cannulation? J Trauma. 2006;61:468-470.
Barbeau G. Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the Allen's test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J. 2004;147:489-493.
Valgimigli M, Campo G, Penzo C, et al. Transradial coronary catheterization and intervention across the whole spectrum of Allen test results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1833-1841.
Reddy S, Pancholy PS, Pandya KP, et al. Variability of forearm collateral circulation: an observational study of serial hand plethysmography testing. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;19:766-770.
Pancholy SB, Bernat I, Bertrand OF, Patel TM. Prevention of radial artery occlusion after Transradial catheterization: the PROPHET-II randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1992-1999.
Rashid M, Kwok CS, Pancholy S, et al. Radial artery occlusion after transradial interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e002686. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002686.
Hahalis GN, Leopoulou M, Tsigkas G, et al. Multicenter randomized evaluation of high versus standard heparin dose on incident radial arterial occlusion after transradial coronary angiography: the SPIRIT OF ARTEMIS study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:2241-2250.
Dharma S, Kedev S, Patel T, Kiemeneij F, Gilchrist IC. A novel approach to reduce radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization: postprocedural/ prehemostasis intra-arterial nitroglycerin. Catheter CardiovascInterv. 2015;85:818-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25661.
Pancholy S, Coppola J, Patel T, Roke-Thomas M. Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72:335-340.
Bernat I, Bertrand OF, Rokyta R, et al. Efficacy and safety of transient ulnar artery compression to recanalize acute radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:1698-1701.
Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis-Holland JE, et al. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:e000035.
Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B, et al. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:814-823.
Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2481-2489.
Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2490-2499.
Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2465-2476.
Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9:1419-1434.
Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Carr M, et al. Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1554-1564.
Kadakia MB, Rao SV, McCoy L, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral access in patients undergoing rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolytic therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1868-1876.
Kwok CS, Khan MA, Rao SV, et al. Access and non-access site bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention and risk of subsequent mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e001645.
Singh S, Singh M, Grewal N, Khosla S. The fluoroscopy time, door to balloon time, contrast volume use and prevalence of vascular access site failure with transradial versus transfemoral approach in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16:491-497.
Valle JA, Kaltenbach LA, Bradley SM, et al. Variation in the adoption of transradial access for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the NCDR CathPCI Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:2242-2254.
Abdelaal E, MacHaalany J, Plourde G, et al. Prediction and impact of failure of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart. 2016;102:919-925.
Baumann F, Roberts JS. Evolving techniques to improve radial/ulnar artery access: crossover rate of 0.3% in 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention via the wrist. J Interv Cardiol. 2015;28:396-404.
Shah RM, Patel D, Abbate A, Cowley MJ, Jovin IS. Comparison of transradial coronary procedures via right radial versus left radial artery approach: a meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88:1027-1033.
Shroff AR, Fernandez C, Vidovich MI, et al. Contemporary transradial access practices: results of the second international survey. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(1):1276-1287.
Hess CN, Peterson ED, Neely ML, et al. The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry®. Circulation 2014;129(22):2277-2286.
Hulme W, Sperrin M, Rushton H, et al. Is there a relationship of operator and center volume with access site-related outcomes?: an analysis from the British cardiovascular intervention society. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:e003333.
Spaulding C, Lefèvre T, Funck F, et al. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;39(4):365-370.
Gargiulo G, Carrara G, Frigoli E, et al. Bivalirudin or heparin in patients undergoing invasive management of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(11):1231-1242.
Pancholy SB, Ahmed I, Bertrand OF, Patel T. Frequency of radial artery occlusion after transradial access in patients receiving warfarin therapy and undergoing coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2014 15;113(2):211-214.
Corcos T. Distal radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: A state-of-the-art review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(4):639-644. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28016.
Ayyaz Ul Haq M, Rashid M, Gilchrist IC, et al. Incidence and clinical course of limb dysfunction post cardiac catheterization: a systematic review. Circ J. 2018;82(11):2736-2744.
Zwaan EM, IJsselmuiden AJ, van Rosmalen J, et al. Rationale and design of the ARCUS: effects of trAnsRadial perCUtaneouS coronary intervention on upper extremity function. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88(7):1036-1043.
Ruzieh M, Moza A, Siddegowda Bangalore B, Schwann T, Tinkel JL. Effect of transradial catheterisation on patency rates of radial arteries used as a conduit for coronary bypass. Heart lung Circ. 2017;26(3):296-300.
Kamiya H, Ushijima T, Kanamori T, et al. Use of the radial artery graft after transradial catheterization: is it suitable as a bypass conduit? Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(5):1505-1509.
Kuno T, Hirano K, Imaeda S, et al. Transradial approach of cardiac catheterization for patients on dialysis. J Inv Cardiol. 2018;30(6):212-217.