The clinical and public health implications and risks of widening the definition of chronic migraine.
Chronic migraine
ICHD-3
chronification
disability
high-frequency episodic migraine
Journal
Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache
ISSN: 1468-2982
Titre abrégé: Cephalalgia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8200710
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
17
12
2019
medline:
2
7
2021
entrez:
17
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The definition of chronic migraine has long been debated. Recently, it was suggested to define subjects with at least 8/migraine days as chronic migraine; that is, incorporating so-called high frequency episodic migraine (eight or more migraine days but less than 15 headache days per month). We addressed the possible problems that might arise based on this proposal accounting for clinical, pathophysiological, impact and public health aspects. Defining chronic migraine on the basis of headache frequency alone does not account for clinical and pathophysiological aspects, as well as for the impact of chronic migraine in terms of disability and quality of life. Moreover, it is potentially harmful for patients in terms of allocation of resources. These issues are discussed in the present manuscript, and we support the idea of defining high frequency episodic migraine as an independent entity as a viable path to follow.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The definition of chronic migraine has long been debated. Recently, it was suggested to define subjects with at least 8/migraine days as chronic migraine; that is, incorporating so-called high frequency episodic migraine (eight or more migraine days but less than 15 headache days per month).
METHODS
We addressed the possible problems that might arise based on this proposal accounting for clinical, pathophysiological, impact and public health aspects.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Defining chronic migraine on the basis of headache frequency alone does not account for clinical and pathophysiological aspects, as well as for the impact of chronic migraine in terms of disability and quality of life. Moreover, it is potentially harmful for patients in terms of allocation of resources. These issues are discussed in the present manuscript, and we support the idea of defining high frequency episodic migraine as an independent entity as a viable path to follow.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31840532
doi: 10.1177/0333102419895777
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
407-410Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn