Trust and world view in shared decision making with indigenous patients: A realist synthesis.
indigenous
patients
realist review
shared decision making
trust
world view
Journal
Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
ISSN: 1365-2753
Titre abrégé: J Eval Clin Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9609066
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
28
02
2019
revised:
07
06
2019
accepted:
09
10
2019
pubmed:
22
11
2019
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
22
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
How shared decision making (SDM) works with indigenous patient values and preferences is not well understood. Colonization has affected indigenous peoples' levels of trust with institutions, and their world view tends to be distinct from that of nonindigenous people. Building on a programme theory for SDM, the present research aims to refine the original programme theory to understand how the mechanisms of trust and world view might work differently for indigenous patients. We used a six-step iterative process for realist synthesis: preliminary programme theory development, search strategy development, selection and appraisal of literature, data extraction, data analysis and synthesis, and formation of a revised programme theory. Searches were through Medline, CINAHL, and the University of Saskatchewan iPortal for grey literature. Medline and CINAHL searches included the University of Alberta Canada-wide indigenous peoples search filters. Following screening 731 references, 90 documents were included for data extraction (53 peer reviewed and 37 grey literature). Documents from countries with similar colonization experiences were included. A total of 518 context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations were identified and synthesized into 21 CMOs for a revised programme theory. Demographics, indigenous world view, system and institutional support, language barriers, and the macro-context of discrimination and historical abuse provided the main contexts for the programme theory. These inspired mechanisms of reciprocal respect, perception of world view acceptance, and culturally appropriate knowledge translation. In turn, these mechanisms influenced the level of trust and anxiety experienced by indigenous patients. Trust and anxiety were both mechanisms and intermediate outcomes and determined the level of engagement in SDM. This realist synthesis provides clinicians and policymakers a deeper understanding of the complex configurations that influence indigenous patient engagement in SDM and offers possible avenues for improvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31750600
doi: 10.1111/jep.13307
pmc: PMC7154772
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
503-514Subventions
Organisme : College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan
Organisme : University of Saskatchewan
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
J Community Psychol. 2011 May 1;39(4):452-477
pubmed: 25076801
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:87-94
pubmed: 28214449
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006 Sep;35(9):655-61
pubmed: 17051283
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(6):1393-405
pubmed: 18191883
Can J Nurs Res. 2004 Dec;36(4):18-44
pubmed: 15739936
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Sep;13(4):280-6
pubmed: 19282240
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;218:21-27
pubmed: 30316132
BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:21
pubmed: 23360677
Med J Aust. 2009 May 18;190(10):574-9
pubmed: 19450207
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Feb 02;10:12
pubmed: 20122253
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2014 Jun 03;73:24411
pubmed: 24936478
Aust Fam Physician. 2008 Dec;37(12):990-4
pubmed: 19142271
Implement Sci. 2015 May 22;10:71
pubmed: 25998148
J Community Health. 2015 Oct;40(5):891-8
pubmed: 25791877
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):340-6
pubmed: 16860965
Arch Public Health. 2023 Sep 27;81(1):174
pubmed: 37759336
Can J Nurs Res. 2012 Jun;44(2):20-42
pubmed: 22894005
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92
pubmed: 9032835
J Rural Health. 2003 Spring;19(2):174-80
pubmed: 12696854
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2001 Jan-Feb;30(1):13-9
pubmed: 11277158
Pac Health Dialog. 2004 Sep;11(2):176-82
pubmed: 16281697
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):503-514
pubmed: 31750600
Contemp Nurse. 2010 Dec-2011 Jan;37(1):21-30
pubmed: 21591823
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:21-34
pubmed: 16053581
Can J Aging. 2013 Dec;32(4):360-74
pubmed: 24112288
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Feb;48:1-9
pubmed: 25265163
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jan 28;15:1
pubmed: 25889846
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Dec 18;12:146
pubmed: 23249503
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7
pubmed: 22618581
J Relig Health. 2015 Aug;54(4):1286-301
pubmed: 24833161
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2007 Jun;66(3):188-98
pubmed: 17655060
Med J Aust. 2005 Jul 4;183(1):39-41
pubmed: 15992339
Can J Public Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;96 Suppl 2:S45-61
pubmed: 16078555
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010 Jun 23;6:18
pubmed: 20569478
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2014 Jun;29(2):131-51
pubmed: 24659060
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2010 Dec;25(4):385-96
pubmed: 20625806
Care Manag J. 2003 Summer;4(2):94-100
pubmed: 14655327
J Cult Divers. 2008 Summer;15(2):70-5
pubmed: 18649444
Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 17;6(1):114
pubmed: 28623941
J Holist Nurs. 1994 Sep;12(3):291-306
pubmed: 7829856