[The contribution of an ethical concertation group in nephrology validated by a research protocol].
L’apport d’une unité de concertation éthique pour la pratique professionnelle en néphrologie validé par un protocole de recherche.
Clinical Protocols
Decision Making
/ ethics
Ethics Committees
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Interdisciplinary Communication
Interviews as Topic
Nephrology
/ organization & administration
Nurses
/ psychology
Palliative Care
/ ethics
Philosophy, Medical
Physicians
/ psychology
Qualitative Research
Renal Dialysis
/ ethics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Withholding Treatment
/ ethics
Arrêt de dialyse
Aspects juridiques en fin de vie
Concertation pluridisciplinaire
Ethicals principles
Health care
Juridical aspects in end stage live
Multidisciplinary committee
Projet de soins
Qualitative research
Recherche qualitative
Withdrawal dialysis
Éthique
Journal
Nephrologie & therapeutique
ISSN: 1872-9177
Titre abrégé: Nephrol Ther
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101248950
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
27
03
2019
revised:
14
07
2019
accepted:
17
07
2019
pubmed:
16
11
2019
medline:
6
5
2020
entrez:
16
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For more than 10 years, nephrologists in the Grenoble-region have sought advice from the Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology with regards to whether to stop or continue dialysis for patients under palliative care. This process deserves a multidisciplinary debate between health professionals and qualified non-health professionals. Thus, we organized a qualitative research protocol in three parts (medical, philosophical, judicial) to explore this issue. Our study aimed to assess the impact of Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology's discussions regarding perception, knowledge, and judicial and ethical considerations. The practical repercussions of decision-making within medical practice, its impacts on the patient and his/her family, as well as associated-health professionals, was assessed. To achieve this, two questionnaires and an interview were organized by three Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology-leaders to review the viewpoints of the 22 permanent Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology members that had participated in 10 Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology sessions between 2015 and 2016 to discuss 21 case-reports. Only 13 persons (4 physicians, 6 nurses, 3 non-health professionals) agreed to respond to the questionnaires, and six physicians agreed to participate in an interview. Overall, it was found that most affected patients' physicians agreed with the multidisciplinary discussion, which included judicial and ethical perspectives, and felt reassured with regards to Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology's final decision. However, our study showed that Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology's functioning could be improved by promoting its existence more widely, by making these decisions earlier within clinical situations, to make Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology more accessible to health workers, to make reports easier to understand, to re-examine a posteriori some clinical situations, and to broaden the scope of multidisciplinary skills.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31727511
pii: S1769-7255(19)30538-3
doi: 10.1016/j.nephro.2019.07.330
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
fre
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
498-505Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.