AAVshRNA-mediated PTEN knockdown in adult neurons attenuates activity-dependent immediate early gene induction.
Animals
Cell Count
Electric Stimulation
Female
Gene Expression Regulation
/ genetics
Gene Knockdown Techniques
Genes, Immediate-Early
/ genetics
Genes, fos
MAP Kinase Signaling System
/ genetics
Male
Nerve Regeneration
Neurons
PTEN Phosphohydrolase
/ genetics
Phosphorylation
RNA, Small Interfering
/ therapeutic use
Rats
Rats, Inbred F344
AAV-shRNA
C-fos
Dentate gyrus
ERK1/2
Immediate early gene
PTEN
Perforant path
Phosphatase and tensin homolog
Ribosomal protein S6
Sensorimotor cortex
mTOR
Journal
Experimental neurology
ISSN: 1090-2430
Titre abrégé: Exp Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370712
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
12
08
2019
revised:
23
10
2019
accepted:
05
11
2019
pubmed:
11
11
2019
medline:
28
10
2020
entrez:
11
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Genetic deletion or knockdown of PTEN enables regeneration of CNS axons, enhances sprouting of intact axons after injury, and induces de novo growth of uninjured adult neurons. It is unknown, however how PTEN deletion in mature neurons alters neuronal physiology. As a first step to address this question, we used immunocytochemistry for activity-dependent markers to assess consequences of PTEN knockdown in cortical neurons and granule cells of the dentate gyrus. In adult rats that received unilateral intra-cortical injections of AAV expressing shRNA against PTEN, immunostaining for c-fos under resting conditions (home cage, HC) and after 1 h of exploration of a novel enriched environment (EE) revealed no hot spots of c-fos expression that would suggest abnormal activity. Counts revealed similar numbers of c-fos positive neurons in the area of PTEN deletion vs. homologous areas in the contralateral cortex in the HC and similar induction of c-fos with EE. However, IEG induction in response to high frequency stimulation (HFS) of the cortex was attenuated in areas of PTEN deletion. In rats with AAVshRNA-mediated PTEN deletion in the dentate gyrus, induction of the IEGs c-fos and Arc with HFS of the perforant path was abrogated in areas of PTEN deletion. Immunostaining using phosphospecific antibodies for phospho-S6 (a downstream marker for mTOR activation) and phospho-ERK1/2 revealed abrogation of S6 phosphorylation in PTEN-deleted areas but preserved activation of phosphorylation of ERK1/2. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Deletion or knockdown of the tumor suppressor gene PTEN enables regenerative growth of adult CNS axons after injury, which is accompanied by enhanced recovery of function. Consequently, PTEN represents a potential target for therapeutic interventions to enhance recovery after CNS injury. Here we show that activity-dependent IEG induction is attenuated in PTEN-depleted neurons. These findings raise the intriguing possibility that functional recovery due to regenerative growth may be limited by the disruption of plasticity-related signaling pathways, and that recovery might be enhanced by restoring PTEN expression after regenerative growth has been achieved.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31707081
pii: S0014-4886(19)30245-6
doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113098
pmc: PMC7943064
mid: NIHMS1554605
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Small Interfering
0
PTEN Phosphohydrolase
EC 3.1.3.67
Pten protein, rat
EC 3.1.3.67
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113098Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS047718
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS073857
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS108189
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : T32 NS045540
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest OS is a co-founder and has economic interests in the company “Axonis”, which holds a license on patents relating to PTEN deletion and axon regeneration.
Références
Learn Mem. 2017 Jul 17;24(8):341-357
pubmed: 28716954
Exp Neurol. 2015 Apr;266:147-60
pubmed: 25704959
Exp Neurol. 2018 May;303:12-28
pubmed: 29337147
J Neurosci. 2014 Mar 26;34(13):4481-93
pubmed: 24671994
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;35(7):3139-45
pubmed: 25698749
Exp Neurol. 2018 Sep;307:133-144
pubmed: 29729248
Learn Mem. 2016 May 18;23(6):255-69
pubmed: 27194793
Learn Mem. 2010 Feb 13;17(2):117-29
pubmed: 20154358
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Mar;10(3):355-62
pubmed: 17277773
Neuron. 2016 May 4;90(3):437-51
pubmed: 27151637
Front Mol Neurosci. 2018 Jan 31;10:435
pubmed: 29445324
J Neurosci. 2014 Jul 23;34(30):9951-62
pubmed: 25057197
J Neurosci. 2017 Jul 26;37(30):7079-7095
pubmed: 28626016
J Neurosci. 2002 Dec 1;22(23):10067-71
pubmed: 12451105
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Sep;13(9):1075-81
pubmed: 20694004
Neuron. 2012 Sep 20;75(6):1022-34
pubmed: 22998871
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2572-8
pubmed: 19240139
Science. 2008 Nov 7;322(5903):963-6
pubmed: 18988856
J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 3;25(31):7210-20
pubmed: 16079403
J Neurosci. 2012 Apr 25;32(17):5880-90
pubmed: 22539849
Neurobiol Dis. 2016 Dec;96:105-114
pubmed: 27597527
J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 21;35(3):943-59
pubmed: 25609613