The VENUSS prognostic model to predict disease recurrence following surgery for non-metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: development and evaluation using the ASSURE prospective clinical trial cohort.


Journal

BMC medicine
ISSN: 1741-7015
Titre abrégé: BMC Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190723

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 10 2019
Historique:
received: 25 03 2019
accepted: 04 09 2019
entrez: 4 10 2019
pubmed: 4 10 2019
medline: 15 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The current World Health Organization classification recognises 12 major subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although these subtypes differ on molecular and clinical levels, they are generally managed as the same disease, simply because they occur in the same organ. Specifically, there is a paucity of tools to risk-stratify patients with papillary RCC (PRCC). The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a tool to risk-stratify patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC following curative surgery. We studied clinicopathological variables and outcomes of 556 patients, who underwent full resection of sporadic, unilateral, non-metastatic (T1-4, N0-1, M0) PRCC at five institutions. Based on multivariable Fine-Gray competing risks regression models, we developed a prognostic scoring system to predict disease recurrence. This was further evaluated in the 150 PRCC patients recruited to the ASSURE trial. We compared the discrimination, calibration and decision-curve clinical net benefit against the Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stage group, University of California Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the 2018 Leibovich prognostic groups. We developed the VENUSS score from significant variables on multivariable analysis, which were the presence of VEnous tumour thrombus, NUclear grade, Size, T and N Stage. We created three risk groups based on the VENUSS score, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence equalling 2.9% in low-risk, 15.4% in intermediate-risk and 54.5% in high-risk patients. 91.7% of low-risk patients had oligometastatic recurrent disease, compared to 16.7% of intermediate-risk and 40.0% of high-risk patients. Discrimination, calibration and clinical net benefit from VENUSS appeared to be superior to UISS, TNM and Leibovich prognostic groups. We developed and tested a prognostic model for patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC, which is based on routine pathological variables. This model may be superior to standard models and could be used for tailoring postoperative surveillance and defining inclusion for prospective adjuvant clinical trials.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The current World Health Organization classification recognises 12 major subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although these subtypes differ on molecular and clinical levels, they are generally managed as the same disease, simply because they occur in the same organ. Specifically, there is a paucity of tools to risk-stratify patients with papillary RCC (PRCC). The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a tool to risk-stratify patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC following curative surgery.
METHODS
We studied clinicopathological variables and outcomes of 556 patients, who underwent full resection of sporadic, unilateral, non-metastatic (T1-4, N0-1, M0) PRCC at five institutions. Based on multivariable Fine-Gray competing risks regression models, we developed a prognostic scoring system to predict disease recurrence. This was further evaluated in the 150 PRCC patients recruited to the ASSURE trial. We compared the discrimination, calibration and decision-curve clinical net benefit against the Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stage group, University of California Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the 2018 Leibovich prognostic groups.
RESULTS
We developed the VENUSS score from significant variables on multivariable analysis, which were the presence of VEnous tumour thrombus, NUclear grade, Size, T and N Stage. We created three risk groups based on the VENUSS score, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence equalling 2.9% in low-risk, 15.4% in intermediate-risk and 54.5% in high-risk patients. 91.7% of low-risk patients had oligometastatic recurrent disease, compared to 16.7% of intermediate-risk and 40.0% of high-risk patients. Discrimination, calibration and clinical net benefit from VENUSS appeared to be superior to UISS, TNM and Leibovich prognostic groups.
CONCLUSIONS
We developed and tested a prognostic model for patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC, which is based on routine pathological variables. This model may be superior to standard models and could be used for tailoring postoperative surveillance and defining inclusion for prospective adjuvant clinical trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31578141
doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1419-1
pii: 10.1186/s12916-019-1419-1
pmc: PMC6775651
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

182

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Références

Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):555-61
pubmed: 19367167
J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):48-51
pubmed: 15592023
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Nov 26;8:53
pubmed: 19036144
Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):861-864
pubmed: 28495043
Cancer Med. 2017 May;6(5):902-909
pubmed: 28414866
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jul 28;9:57
pubmed: 19638200
Urology. 2010 Dec;76(6):1298-301
pubmed: 21030068
Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2392-8
pubmed: 26371288
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 10;25(11):1316-22
pubmed: 17416852
PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001381
pubmed: 23393430
World J Urol. 2016 Aug;34(8):1073-9
pubmed: 27055532
Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;28(11):2747-2753
pubmed: 28945839
J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):53-8
pubmed: 20478577
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Oct;140(10):1026-37
pubmed: 27684973
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec 1;20(23):4559-66
pubmed: 12454113
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Sep;5(5):857-866
pubmed: 29525381
Ann Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;29(2):324-331
pubmed: 29186296
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Oct;37(10):1490-504
pubmed: 24025520
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Feb 15;15(4):1162-9
pubmed: 19228721
Hum Pathol. 2018 Apr;74:99-108
pubmed: 29339177
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184173
pubmed: 28934212
World J Urol. 2016 May;34(5):687-93
pubmed: 26407582
Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):2008-16
pubmed: 26969090
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):772-780
pubmed: 29398265
Stat Med. 2014 Aug 15;33(18):3191-203
pubmed: 24668611
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24
pubmed: 25616710
Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):644-61
pubmed: 21741163
Cancer. 2003 Apr 1;97(7):1663-71
pubmed: 12655523
J Urol. 2002 Dec;168(6):2395-400
pubmed: 12441925

Auteurs

Tobias Klatte (T)

Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. tobias.klatte@gmx.de.
Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. tobias.klatte@gmx.de.
Department of Urology, The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, UK. tobias.klatte@gmx.de.

Kevin M Gallagher (KM)

Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Luca Afferi (L)

Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.

Alessandro Volpe (A)

Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.

Nils Kroeger (N)

Department of Urology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany.

Silvia Ribback (S)

Institute of Pathology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany.

Alan McNeill (A)

Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Antony C P Riddick (ACP)

Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

James N Armitage (JN)

Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Tevita F 'Aho (TF)

Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Tim Eisen (T)

Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Astra Zeneca, Cambridge, UK.

Kate Fife (K)

Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Axel Bex (A)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Allan J Pantuck (AJ)

Institute of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Grant D Stewart (GD)

Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH