The VENUSS prognostic model to predict disease recurrence following surgery for non-metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: development and evaluation using the ASSURE prospective clinical trial cohort.
Adult
Aged
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
/ diagnosis
Clinical Trials as Topic
/ statistics & numerical data
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Incidence
Kidney Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ diagnosis
Neoplasm Staging
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Research Design
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Adjuvant
Localised
Papillary
Prognosis
Recurrence
Surveillance
Journal
BMC medicine
ISSN: 1741-7015
Titre abrégé: BMC Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190723
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 10 2019
03 10 2019
Historique:
received:
25
03
2019
accepted:
04
09
2019
entrez:
4
10
2019
pubmed:
4
10
2019
medline:
15
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The current World Health Organization classification recognises 12 major subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although these subtypes differ on molecular and clinical levels, they are generally managed as the same disease, simply because they occur in the same organ. Specifically, there is a paucity of tools to risk-stratify patients with papillary RCC (PRCC). The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a tool to risk-stratify patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC following curative surgery. We studied clinicopathological variables and outcomes of 556 patients, who underwent full resection of sporadic, unilateral, non-metastatic (T1-4, N0-1, M0) PRCC at five institutions. Based on multivariable Fine-Gray competing risks regression models, we developed a prognostic scoring system to predict disease recurrence. This was further evaluated in the 150 PRCC patients recruited to the ASSURE trial. We compared the discrimination, calibration and decision-curve clinical net benefit against the Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stage group, University of California Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the 2018 Leibovich prognostic groups. We developed the VENUSS score from significant variables on multivariable analysis, which were the presence of VEnous tumour thrombus, NUclear grade, Size, T and N Stage. We created three risk groups based on the VENUSS score, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence equalling 2.9% in low-risk, 15.4% in intermediate-risk and 54.5% in high-risk patients. 91.7% of low-risk patients had oligometastatic recurrent disease, compared to 16.7% of intermediate-risk and 40.0% of high-risk patients. Discrimination, calibration and clinical net benefit from VENUSS appeared to be superior to UISS, TNM and Leibovich prognostic groups. We developed and tested a prognostic model for patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC, which is based on routine pathological variables. This model may be superior to standard models and could be used for tailoring postoperative surveillance and defining inclusion for prospective adjuvant clinical trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The current World Health Organization classification recognises 12 major subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although these subtypes differ on molecular and clinical levels, they are generally managed as the same disease, simply because they occur in the same organ. Specifically, there is a paucity of tools to risk-stratify patients with papillary RCC (PRCC). The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a tool to risk-stratify patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC following curative surgery.
METHODS
We studied clinicopathological variables and outcomes of 556 patients, who underwent full resection of sporadic, unilateral, non-metastatic (T1-4, N0-1, M0) PRCC at five institutions. Based on multivariable Fine-Gray competing risks regression models, we developed a prognostic scoring system to predict disease recurrence. This was further evaluated in the 150 PRCC patients recruited to the ASSURE trial. We compared the discrimination, calibration and decision-curve clinical net benefit against the Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stage group, University of California Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the 2018 Leibovich prognostic groups.
RESULTS
We developed the VENUSS score from significant variables on multivariable analysis, which were the presence of VEnous tumour thrombus, NUclear grade, Size, T and N Stage. We created three risk groups based on the VENUSS score, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence equalling 2.9% in low-risk, 15.4% in intermediate-risk and 54.5% in high-risk patients. 91.7% of low-risk patients had oligometastatic recurrent disease, compared to 16.7% of intermediate-risk and 40.0% of high-risk patients. Discrimination, calibration and clinical net benefit from VENUSS appeared to be superior to UISS, TNM and Leibovich prognostic groups.
CONCLUSIONS
We developed and tested a prognostic model for patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC, which is based on routine pathological variables. This model may be superior to standard models and could be used for tailoring postoperative surveillance and defining inclusion for prospective adjuvant clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31578141
doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1419-1
pii: 10.1186/s12916-019-1419-1
pmc: PMC6775651
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
182Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):555-61
pubmed: 19367167
J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):48-51
pubmed: 15592023
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Nov 26;8:53
pubmed: 19036144
Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):861-864
pubmed: 28495043
Cancer Med. 2017 May;6(5):902-909
pubmed: 28414866
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jul 28;9:57
pubmed: 19638200
Urology. 2010 Dec;76(6):1298-301
pubmed: 21030068
Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2392-8
pubmed: 26371288
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 10;25(11):1316-22
pubmed: 17416852
PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001381
pubmed: 23393430
World J Urol. 2016 Aug;34(8):1073-9
pubmed: 27055532
Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;28(11):2747-2753
pubmed: 28945839
J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):53-8
pubmed: 20478577
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Oct;140(10):1026-37
pubmed: 27684973
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec 1;20(23):4559-66
pubmed: 12454113
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Sep;5(5):857-866
pubmed: 29525381
Ann Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;29(2):324-331
pubmed: 29186296
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Oct;37(10):1490-504
pubmed: 24025520
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Feb 15;15(4):1162-9
pubmed: 19228721
Hum Pathol. 2018 Apr;74:99-108
pubmed: 29339177
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184173
pubmed: 28934212
World J Urol. 2016 May;34(5):687-93
pubmed: 26407582
Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):2008-16
pubmed: 26969090
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):772-780
pubmed: 29398265
Stat Med. 2014 Aug 15;33(18):3191-203
pubmed: 24668611
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24
pubmed: 25616710
Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):644-61
pubmed: 21741163
Cancer. 2003 Apr 1;97(7):1663-71
pubmed: 12655523
J Urol. 2002 Dec;168(6):2395-400
pubmed: 12441925