Predicting disease progression in high-grade glioma with neuropsychological parameters: the value of personalized longitudinal assessment.
Adult
Aged
Brain Neoplasms
/ pathology
Cognition Disorders
/ diagnosis
Disease Progression
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glioma
/ pathology
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Neurosurgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Precision Medicine
Predictive Value of Tests
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Risk Factors
Young Adult
Cognitive functioning
Disease progression
High-grade glioma
Neuropsychological assessment
RANO
Journal
Journal of neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1573-7373
Titre abrégé: J Neurooncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
22
05
2019
accepted:
19
07
2019
pubmed:
26
7
2019
medline:
15
2
2020
entrez:
26
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Progressive disease in patients with high-grade glioma may be reflected in cognitive decline. However, the cognitive functions most sensitive to progression may differ between patients. We investigated whether decline on a personalized selection of tests predicted progressive disease according to RANO criteria in high-grade glioma patients. Starting one day before surgery, patients underwent neuropsychological assessment every three months during standard treatment and clinical follow-up. We first made a personalized selection of three tests that showed the highest Reliable Change Index (RCI) values, i.e., most positive change, at the first post-surgical assessment for each patient. In subsequent follow up, a decline of RCI ≤ - 1 on at least two of the three tests in the selection was considered cognitive decline. We performed a discrete Cox proportional hazards model including a time-dependent coefficient cognitive decline (vs. stability) and covariate age to predict progressive disease. Twenty five patients were included. Cognitive decline on the personalized test selection preceded or had occurred by the time progression was established in 9/15 patients with RANO confirmed progressive disease (60%). Decline was absent in 8/10 patients (80%) with stable disease during participation. The independent hazard ratio for progression in case of cognitive decline was 5.05 (p < 0.01) compared to stable performance. Using only three patient-specific neuropsychological tests, we found a fivefold increased chance of disease progression in case of cognitive decline as compared to stable performance. Brief, patient-tailored cognitive assessment may be a noninvasive addition to disease monitoring without overburdening patients and clinical care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31342318
doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03249-1
pii: 10.1007/s11060-019-03249-1
pmc: PMC6764928
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02953756']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
511-518Subventions
Organisme : CZ Group
ID : 201500028
Références
Psychol Assess. 2018 Dec;30(12):1652-1662
pubmed: 29952595
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec 1;24(34):5427-33
pubmed: 17135644
Psychol Med. 2014 Jul;44(10):2029-40
pubmed: 24168753
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Jun;14(6):808-16
pubmed: 22508762
Neurology. 2003 Apr 8;60(7):1113-8
pubmed: 12682316
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009 Apr;31(3):339-52
pubmed: 18618359
J Neurooncol. 2012 Jun;108(2):231-7
pubmed: 22331519
Neuro Oncol. 2004 Jul;6(3):227-35
pubmed: 15279715
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(3):646-50
pubmed: 10653880
Neurology. 2003 Dec 23;61(12):1796-8
pubmed: 14694052
CNS Oncol. 2013 Mar;2(2):195-201
pubmed: 25057978
Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):459-66
pubmed: 19269895
J Neurooncol. 2016 Sep;129(3):479-485
pubmed: 27406585
Neuro Oncol. 2007 Jan;9(1):53-62
pubmed: 17018697
J Neurooncol. 2010 Mar;97(1):89-94
pubmed: 19718545
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5743-50
pubmed: 19805672
Cancer. 2003 Feb 1;97(3):649-56
pubmed: 12548607
Neuron. 2006 Oct 5;52(1):155-68
pubmed: 17015233
Neuro Oncol. 2003 Apr;5(2):89-95
pubmed: 12672280
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2008 Apr;39(2):64-76
pubmed: 18500167
Neurooncol Pract. 2015 Sep;2(3):137-143
pubmed: 31386094
Arch Neurol. 1990 Apr;47(4):397-405
pubmed: 2322133
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;21(7):623-43
pubmed: 17014981
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Aug;156(8):1451-9
pubmed: 24879620
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1963-72
pubmed: 20231676
Future Oncol. 2017 Dec;13(29):2719-2731
pubmed: 29186986
Assessment. 2017 Sep 1;:1073191117727346
pubmed: 28895436
Brain. 2014 Sep;137(Pt 9):2408-22
pubmed: 24871646