Evaluation of a simple technique aiming at optimizing point-by-point isolation of the left pulmonary veins: a randomized study.
Atrial fibrillation
Catheter stability
Pulmonary vein isolation
Radiofrequency ablation
Journal
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2019
01 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
28
12
2018
accepted:
02
04
2019
pubmed:
6
5
2019
medline:
1
12
2020
entrez:
7
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of a simple technique for stabilizing the ablation catheter during anterior pulmonary vein (PV) encirclement in patients ablated for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. This consisted of bending the ablation catheter in the left atrium, creating a loop that was cautiously advanced together with the long sheath at the ostium and then within the left superior PV. The curve was then progressively released to reach a stable contact with the anterior part of the left PVs. Eighty consecutive patients (age 64 ± 11 years, left atrial diameter 43 ± 8 mm) undergoing 'CLOSE'-guided PV isolation were prospectively randomized into two groups depending on whether the loop technique was used or not. When using the loop technique, the encirclement of the left PVs was shorter [20 min (interquartile range, IQR 17-24) vs. 26 min (IQR 18-33), P < 0.01] with a high rate of first pass isolation [(100%) vs. (97%), P = 0.9] and adenosine proof isolation [(93%) vs. (95%), P = 0.67]. Most specifically, at the anterior part of the left PVs, there were less dislocations [0 (IQR 0-0) vs. 1 (IQR 0-4), P < 0.001], radiofrequency duration was shorter (272 ± 85 s vs. 378 ± 122 s, P < 0.001), force-time integral was higher [524 gs (IQR 427-687) vs. 398 gs (IQR 354-451), P < 0.001], average contact force was higher [20 g (IQR 13-27) vs. 11g (IQR 9-16), P < 0.001], and impedance drop was higher [12 Ω (IQR 9-19) vs. 10 Ω (IQR 7-14), P < 0.001]. This study describes a simple technique to facilitate catheter stability at the anterior part of the left PVs, resulting in more efficient left PV encirclement without compromising safety.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31056640
pii: 5485755
doi: 10.1093/europace/euz115
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1185-1192Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.