Study protocol: exploring the efficacy of cyclophosphamide added to corticosteroids for treating acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center phase III trial (EXAFIP).
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
/ therapeutic use
Cause of Death
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Cyclophosphamide
/ therapeutic use
Disease Progression
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
France
Humans
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
/ drug therapy
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Prognosis
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Acute exacerbation
Cyclophosphamide
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Journal
BMC pulmonary medicine
ISSN: 1471-2466
Titre abrégé: BMC Pulm Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Apr 2019
11 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
21
10
2018
accepted:
10
03
2019
entrez:
12
4
2019
pubmed:
12
4
2019
medline:
9
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal lung disease, with a median survival of 2-3 years and variable natural history, characterized by gradual and progressive deterioration. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is a severe complication, associated with poor survival and a mortality > 50%. To date, no treatment has proven effective in AE-IPF, with cyclophosphamide (CYC) the only therapy suggested to be effective on survival, primarily based on retrospective series. Considering the high fatality rates of AE-IPF, evaluating the efficacy of immunosuppressive agents in a randomized controlled trial proves crucial, as the results could significantly impact treatment and prognosis of AE-IPF. The EXAFIP study is a French national multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Its primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CYC compared to placebo on early survival in patients treated with corticosteroids. We hypothesize that adding CYC to high-dose corticosteroids would reduce 3-month mortality in AE-IPF patients. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality rate at Month 3; secondary objectives are to evaluate the efficacy of CYC compared to placebo on overall survival at Months 6 and 12, respiratory disease-specific mortality, respiratory morbidity, and chest high-resolution computed tomography features, and to determine prognostic factors in AE-IPF and compare the safety of the two treatment arms during 6 months' follow-up. There is an urgent unmet clinical need for effective AE-IPF treatment. The EXAFIP study is the first large Phase III placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of CYC added to corticosteroids in treating AE-IPF. The results of this study could significantly impact treatment strategy and prognosis of AE-IPF. Clinical trials, NCT02460588 ; Date: June 2, 2015, prospectively; Issue date: 14/11/2017; Protocole Amendment Number: 03.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal lung disease, with a median survival of 2-3 years and variable natural history, characterized by gradual and progressive deterioration. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is a severe complication, associated with poor survival and a mortality > 50%. To date, no treatment has proven effective in AE-IPF, with cyclophosphamide (CYC) the only therapy suggested to be effective on survival, primarily based on retrospective series. Considering the high fatality rates of AE-IPF, evaluating the efficacy of immunosuppressive agents in a randomized controlled trial proves crucial, as the results could significantly impact treatment and prognosis of AE-IPF.
METHODS
METHODS
The EXAFIP study is a French national multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Its primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CYC compared to placebo on early survival in patients treated with corticosteroids. We hypothesize that adding CYC to high-dose corticosteroids would reduce 3-month mortality in AE-IPF patients. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality rate at Month 3; secondary objectives are to evaluate the efficacy of CYC compared to placebo on overall survival at Months 6 and 12, respiratory disease-specific mortality, respiratory morbidity, and chest high-resolution computed tomography features, and to determine prognostic factors in AE-IPF and compare the safety of the two treatment arms during 6 months' follow-up.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
There is an urgent unmet clinical need for effective AE-IPF treatment. The EXAFIP study is the first large Phase III placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of CYC added to corticosteroids in treating AE-IPF. The results of this study could significantly impact treatment strategy and prognosis of AE-IPF.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Clinical trials, NCT02460588 ; Date: June 2, 2015, prospectively; Issue date: 14/11/2017; Protocole Amendment Number: 03.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30971235
doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0830-x
pii: 10.1186/s12890-019-0830-x
pmc: PMC6458697
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
0
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02460588']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
75Subventions
Organisme : Roche
ID : RAF15.014- P140908-VAL 2015-245
Organisme : PHRC
ID : PHRC 2014-P140908 - AOM14502
Références
Am J Clin Pathol. 2003 May;119(5):709-14
pubmed: 12760290
Intern Med. 2003 Jul;42(7):565-70
pubmed: 12879947
Eur Respir J. 2003 Nov;22(5):821-6
pubmed: 14621091
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 1):963-7
pubmed: 15968010
Eur Respir J. 2006 Jan;27(1):143-50
pubmed: 16387947
Respir Med. 2006 Oct;100(10):1753-9
pubmed: 16584880
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 22;354(25):2655-66
pubmed: 16790698
Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Feb;31(2):277-84
pubmed: 17255773
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Oct 1;176(7):636-43
pubmed: 17585107
Respirology. 2007 Sep;12(5):700-6
pubmed: 17875058
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug 15;178(4):372-8
pubmed: 18451320
Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Jun;19(4):227-35
pubmed: 18471669
Intern Med. 2010;49(2):109-15
pubmed: 20075573
Eur Respir J. 2011 Feb;37(2):356-63
pubmed: 20595144
Intern Med. 2010;49(15):1509-14
pubmed: 20686281
Intern Med. 2011;50(3):189-95
pubmed: 21297319
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Mar 15;183(6):788-824
pubmed: 21471066
Eur Radiol. 2012 Jan;22(1):83-92
pubmed: 21822949
Respiration. 2012;83(1):28-35
pubmed: 21860222
Respiration. 2012;83(1):20-7
pubmed: 21912082
Eur Respir J. 2011 Dec;38(6):1487-9
pubmed: 22130770
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Jul 1;186(1):88-95
pubmed: 22561965
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1968-77
pubmed: 22607134
Eur Respir J. 2013 May;41(5):1207-18
pubmed: 23100500
Eur Respir Rev. 2012 Dec 1;21(126):355-61
pubmed: 23204124
Respir Res. 2013 Jul 13;14:73
pubmed: 23848435
Chest. 2016 Nov;150(5):1118-1128
pubmed: 27102182
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug 1;194(3):265-75
pubmed: 27299520
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2016 Dec 23;33(4):385-391
pubmed: 28079851