Optimizing intraoperative administration of propofol, remifentanil, and fentanyl through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations to increase the postoperative duration of analgesia.


Journal

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
ISSN: 1573-2614
Titre abrégé: J Clin Monit Comput
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9806357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 05 10 2018
accepted: 05 03 2019
pubmed: 14 3 2019
medline: 10 7 2020
entrez: 14 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Titrating an intraoperative anesthetic to achieve the postoperative goals of rapid emergence and prolonged analgesia can be difficult because of inter-patient variability and the need to provide intraoperative sedation and analgesia. Modeling pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anesthetic administrations estimates drug concentrations and predicted responses to stimuli during anesthesia. With utility of these PK/PD models we created an algorithm to optimize the intraoperative dosing regimen. We hypothesized the optimization algorithm would find a dosing regimen that would increase the postoperative duration of analgesia, not increase the time to emergence, and meet the intraoperative requirements of sedation and analgesia. To evaluate these hypotheses we performed a simulation study on previously collected anesthesia data. We developed an algorithm to recommend different intraoperative dosing regimens for improved post-operative results. To test the post-operative results of the algorithm we tested it on previously collected anesthesia data. An anesthetic dataset of 21 patients was obtained from a previous study from an anesthetic database at the University of Utah. Using the anesthetic records from these surgeries we modeled 21 patients using the same patient demographics and anesthetic requirements as the dataset. The anesthetic was simulated for each of the 21 patients with three different dosing regimens. The three dosing regimens are: from the anesthesiologist as recorded in the dataset (control group), from the algorithm in the clinical scenario one (test group), and from the algorithm in the clinical scenario two (test group). We created two clinical scenarios for the optimization algorithm to perform; one with normal general anesthesia constraints and goals, and a second condition where a delayed time to emergence is allowed to further maximize the duration of analgesia. The algorithm was evaluated by comparing the post-operative results of the control group to each of the test groups. Comparing results between the clinical scenario 1 dosing to the actual dosing showed a median increase in the duration of analgesia by 6 min and the time to emergence by 0.3 min. This was achieved by decreasing the intraoperative remifentanil infusion rate, increased the fentanyl dosing regimen, and not changing the propofol infusion rate. Comparing results between the clinical scenario 2 dosing to the actual dosing showed a median increase in the duration of analgesia by 26 min and emergence by 1.5 min. To dosing regimen from clinical scenario 2 greatly increased the fentanyl dosing regimen and greatly decreased the remifentanil infusion rate with no change to the propofol infusion rate. The results from this preliminary analysis of the optimization algorithm appear to imply that it can operate as intended. However a clinical study is warranted to determine to what extent the optimization algorithm determined optimal dosing regimens can maximize the postoperative duration of analgesia without delaying the time to emergence in a clinical setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30864076
doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00298-9
pii: 10.1007/s10877-019-00298-9
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anesthetics, Intravenous 0
Remifentanil P10582JYYK
Fentanyl UF599785JZ
Propofol YI7VU623SF

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

959-971

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Références

Anesthesiology. 1990 Dec;73(6):1091-102
pubmed: 2248388
Anesthesiology. 1993 Nov;79(5):881-92
pubmed: 7902032
Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1353-72
pubmed: 15166553
Anesthesiology. 1998 May;88(5):1170-82
pubmed: 9605675
Anesth Analg. 2011 Sep;113(3):490-9
pubmed: 21415430
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Jan;118(1):44-57
pubmed: 28039241
Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Nov;81(11):1163-9
pubmed: 25598294
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jul;107(1):38-47
pubmed: 21624964
Anesthesiology. 1999 Jun;90(6):1502-16
pubmed: 10360845
Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1549-62
pubmed: 9416739
Anesthesiology. 1997 Jan;86(1):10-23
pubmed: 9009935
Anesth Analg. 2011 Mar;112(3):546-57
pubmed: 21233500
Anesthesiology. 1997 Jan;86(1):24-33
pubmed: 9009936
Anesth Analg. 2008 Feb;106(2):471-9, table of contents
pubmed: 18227302
Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1373-81
pubmed: 15166554
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995 Aug;29(2):80-94
pubmed: 7586903
Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):240-1
pubmed: 22222474
Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):565-75
pubmed: 11873029

Auteurs

Carl Tams (C)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. carl.tams@utah.edu.

Noah Syroid (N)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
MedVis, 2050 E 1700 S, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.

Terrie Vasilopoulos (T)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100524, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0254, USA.

Ken Johnson (K)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH