Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using high-density pedicle screw constructs: Is 5-year routine visit required?
Adolescent
Child
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kyphosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Long-Term Care
/ organization & administration
Male
Pedicle Screws
/ adverse effects
Postoperative Complications
/ diagnosis
Postoperative Period
Quality of Life
Quebec
Radiography
Reoperation
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Scoliosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Spinal Fusion
/ adverse effects
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Unnecessary Procedures
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Quality of life
Scoliosis
Spinal deformity
Spine
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
25
07
2018
accepted:
13
01
2019
pubmed:
12
2
2019
medline:
1
7
2020
entrez:
12
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this study is to determine whether routine follow-up 5 years after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery is likely to affect postoperative care for patients treated with high-density pedicle screw constructs, when routine 2-year follow-up has been performed. We reviewed 80 patients undergoing surgery for AIS using high-density pedicle screw constructs and followed routinely 2 and 5 years after surgery. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the SRS-30 outcome questionnaire. Reoperations occurring between 2 and 5 years after surgery were identified. Curve correction and QOL were similar between 2- and 5-year visits. Two patients required revision surgery after presenting during unplanned visits between the 2- and 5-year follow-ups. One patient presented at the routine 5-year visit with an asymptomatic undisplaced rod fracture without loss of correction, and it was decided to follow-up only as needed. In AIS patients for whom routine follow-up 2 years after surgery using high-density pedicle screw constructs was uneventful, additional routine 5-year follow-up is not likely to affect postoperative care and revision rate. Patients developing complications and needing reoperation between 2 and 5 years after surgery will most likely present during unplanned visits rather than during routine follow-up appointments. Easy access to emergent visits on an as-needed basis is therefore important for this population if routine 5-year follow-up is not planned. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30741338
doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05887-5
pii: 10.1007/s00586-019-05887-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1296-1300Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 15;32(20):2258-64
pubmed: 17873820
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jun;22(4):251-6
pubmed: 19494744
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2147-50
pubmed: 19752700
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 1;35(5):562-7
pubmed: 20118842
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21):E1402-6
pubmed: 21681134
Spine J. 2013 Apr;13(4):375-81
pubmed: 22901787
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jan 15;38(2):E113-9
pubmed: 23124268
Eur Spine J. 2013 Jun;22(6):1292-9
pubmed: 23254863
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jan 15;39(2):E104-10
pubmed: 24150432
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 1;39(7):571-8
pubmed: 24430717
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jan;35(1):33-8
pubmed: 24840654
Eur Spine J. 2016 Oct;25(10):3324-3330
pubmed: 26661637
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 1;42(13):999-1005
pubmed: 27831967
Spine J. 2017 May;17(5):663-670
pubmed: 27867081
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Mar 15;43(6):402-410
pubmed: 28723878