Does integration of Magee equations into routine clinical practice affect whether oncologists order the Oncotype DX test? A prospective randomized trial.


Journal

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
ISSN: 1365-2753
Titre abrégé: J Eval Clin Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9609066

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Historique:
received: 26 07 2018
revised: 29 11 2018
accepted: 06 12 2018
pubmed: 24 1 2019
medline: 31 7 2019
entrez: 24 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The three Magee Equations provide an estimate of the Oncotype DX recurrence score using commonly available clinicopathologic information (tumour size, grade, oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, and Ki67). We assessed whether integration of Magee Equations into routine clinical practice affected the frequency of Oncotype DX requests. Patients with newly diagnosed, node negative, hormone receptor positive, and HER2 negative invasive breast cancer were randomized to undergo a Magee calculation or not. At the first clinic assessment, the oncologist was provided with all routinely available clinicopathologic information (including Ki67) either with or without the results of Magee Equations. Primary outcome was frequency of Oncotype DX ordering. Secondary outcomes included frequency of chemotherapy use, time to commencement of radiotherapy, or systemic therapy. Physician comfort with systemic therapy choices and the use of Ki67 and Magee Equations was also assessed. Data from 175 randomized patients was available, 84 patients (48%) with and 91 (52%) without calculated Magee Equations. Oncotype DX was ordered in 10 (12.05%) and 13 (14.44%) (RR 0.83, 0.39-1.80; P = 0.64) in the Magee and no Magee groups, respectively. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the randomized groups for any of the secondary outcomes. Availability of both Ki67 and Magee Equations was associated with increased physician comfort around systemic treatment decisions. In a practice where Ki67 is routinely available, addition of Magee Equations into routine clinic practice was not associated with a reduction in Oncotype DX use. Availability of both Ki67 and Magee Equations did however increase physician comfort with systemic therapy decisions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30672056
doi: 10.1111/jep.13094
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Pagination

196-204

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Auteurs

Susan J Robertson (SJ)

Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Mohammed F K Ibrahim (MFK)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Carol Stober (C)

Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

John Hilton (J)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Zuzana Kos (Z)

Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Sasha Mazzarello (S)

Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Tim Ramsay (T)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Dean Fergusson (D)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Lisa Vandermeer (L)

Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Ranjeeta Mallick (R)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Angel Arnaout (A)

Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Susan F Dent (SF)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Roanne Segal (R)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Sandeep Sehdev (S)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Stan Gertler (S)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Brian Hutton (B)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Mark Clemons (M)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH