Systemic Therapy Use and Outcomes After Relapse from Preoperative Radiation and Extrapleural Pneumonectomy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.
Aged
Combined Modality Therapy
Disease Progression
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ mortality
Male
Mesothelioma
/ mortality
Mesothelioma, Malignant
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ mortality
Pneumonectomy
/ mortality
Preoperative Care
Prognosis
Radiotherapy
/ mortality
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Chemotherapy
Extrapleural pneumonectomy
Mesothelioma
Multimodality therapy
Radiation
Surgery
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
13
08
2018
accepted:
16
10
2018
pubmed:
28
11
2018
medline:
14
5
2020
entrez:
28
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Multimodality therapy with preoperative radiation (RT) followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EP) for patients with operable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has demonstrated encouraging results. At relapse, there are few data on the tolerance and efficacy of systemic therapies after prior multimodality therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with relapsed MPM after RT and EPP ± adjuvant chemotherapy to determine overall survival (OS; date of relapse to death) and the proportion of patients that received systemic therapy and associated response rate (RR). OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and potential prognostic variables were examined. Fifty-three patients were included (2008-2016). Median OS was 4.8 months (median follow-up 4.4 months, range 0.03-34.8). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥2, disease-free interval (DFI) <1 year, and hemoglobin ≤110 g/L at recurrence were associated with worse prognosis. Thirty-six percent of patients received any systemic therapy, whereas it was omitted in 62% because of poor PS. RR was 15% (0 complete responses, 15% partial responses) in 13 individuals with response-evaluable disease. Therapy was discontinued because of toxicity (6/15) or disease progression (5/15), and median number of cycles was four. Patients with relapsed MPM following RT and EPP, especially those with ECOG PS ≥2, DFI <1 year, and hemoglobin ≤110 g/L at recurrence, have poor prognosis and low RR to first-line systemic therapy. Earlier detection and novel diagnostic markers of relapse as well as potential neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy should be investigated in future studies. The results of this study have reinforced the importance of careful selection of appropriate candidates for this combined-modality approach and favor prompt detection of recurrence with early and regular postoperative imaging and biopsy of suspected relapsed disease along with rapid initiation of systemic therapy even in patients with very low burden of disease. Furthermore, with the emergence of new systemic agents targeting different histological subtypes of malignant pleural mesothelioma, histological sampling of recurrence could inform therapeutic decisions in the future.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Multimodality therapy with preoperative radiation (RT) followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EP) for patients with operable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has demonstrated encouraging results. At relapse, there are few data on the tolerance and efficacy of systemic therapies after prior multimodality therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with relapsed MPM after RT and EPP ± adjuvant chemotherapy to determine overall survival (OS; date of relapse to death) and the proportion of patients that received systemic therapy and associated response rate (RR). OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and potential prognostic variables were examined.
RESULTS
Fifty-three patients were included (2008-2016). Median OS was 4.8 months (median follow-up 4.4 months, range 0.03-34.8). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥2, disease-free interval (DFI) <1 year, and hemoglobin ≤110 g/L at recurrence were associated with worse prognosis. Thirty-six percent of patients received any systemic therapy, whereas it was omitted in 62% because of poor PS. RR was 15% (0 complete responses, 15% partial responses) in 13 individuals with response-evaluable disease. Therapy was discontinued because of toxicity (6/15) or disease progression (5/15), and median number of cycles was four.
CONCLUSION
Patients with relapsed MPM following RT and EPP, especially those with ECOG PS ≥2, DFI <1 year, and hemoglobin ≤110 g/L at recurrence, have poor prognosis and low RR to first-line systemic therapy. Earlier detection and novel diagnostic markers of relapse as well as potential neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy should be investigated in future studies.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
The results of this study have reinforced the importance of careful selection of appropriate candidates for this combined-modality approach and favor prompt detection of recurrence with early and regular postoperative imaging and biopsy of suspected relapsed disease along with rapid initiation of systemic therapy even in patients with very low burden of disease. Furthermore, with the emergence of new systemic agents targeting different histological subtypes of malignant pleural mesothelioma, histological sampling of recurrence could inform therapeutic decisions in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30478189
pii: theoncologist.2018-0501
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0501
pmc: PMC6656469
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e510-e517Informations de copyright
© AlphaMed Press 2018.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2636-44
pubmed: 12860938
Ann Oncol. 2004 Feb;15(2):257-60
pubmed: 14760119
Lung Cancer. 2005 Jul;49 Suppl 1:S49-52
pubmed: 15894403
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):6881-9
pubmed: 16192580
Thorax. 2008 May;63(5):435-9
pubmed: 18202164
Mod Pathol. 2010 Mar;23(3):470-9
pubmed: 20081811
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Mar;5(3):385-8
pubmed: 20087231
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):763-72
pubmed: 21723781
Mod Pathol. 2012 May;25(5):689-98
pubmed: 22222641
Anticancer Res. 2012 Feb;32(2):609-13
pubmed: 22287752
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Nov;7(11):1728-34
pubmed: 23059782
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Nov;7(11):1631-9
pubmed: 23070243
Clin Imaging. 2013 Nov-Dec;37(6):1098-103
pubmed: 23932389
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Nov;1(4):428-37
pubmed: 23977533
Lung Cancer. 2014 Feb;83(2):240-5
pubmed: 24360321
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Mar;9(3):397-402
pubmed: 24445595
Lung Cancer. 2014 Nov;86(2):133-6
pubmed: 25217189
Lung Cancer Int. 2015;2015:590148
pubmed: 26316950
BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 06;15:857
pubmed: 26546402
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 May;49(5):1516-23
pubmed: 26590183
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Feb;151(2):468-73
pubmed: 26614413
Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1405-1414
pubmed: 26719230
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Feb;11(2):249-55
pubmed: 26845118
Lung Cancer. 2016 Oct;100:5-13
pubmed: 27597274
Thorac Cancer. 2011 Feb;2(1):16-23
pubmed: 27755841
Lung Cancer. 2017 Oct;112:102-108
pubmed: 29191582
J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 1;36(13):1343-1373
pubmed: 29346042
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Feb;63(2):334-8
pubmed: 9033296
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):145-52
pubmed: 9440736
Chest. 1998 Mar;113(3):723-31
pubmed: 9515850