Predictors of sentinel lymph node positivity in thin melanoma using the National Cancer Database.


Journal

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
ISSN: 1097-6787
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7907132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 11 12 2017
revised: 26 08 2018
accepted: 29 08 2018
pubmed: 22 9 2018
medline: 6 3 2019
entrez: 22 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) specimens are often obtained from patients for further staging after these patients have undergone melanoma excision. Limited data regarding predictors of SLNB positivity in thin melanoma are available. We sought to evaluate predictors of SLNB positivity in thin melanoma. Patients with cutaneous melanoma with a Breslow thickness ≤1.00 mm who received a SLNB were identified from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2014 (n = 9186). Predictors of SLNB positivity were analyzed using logistic regression. In a multivariate analysis, patients <60 years of age (P < .001) and Breslow thickness >0.8 mm (P = .03) were at increased risk for positive sentinel lymph node (SLN). Moreover, on multivariate analysis, the presence of dermal mitoses increased the odds of SLN positivity by 95% (odds ratio [OR] 1.95 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.53-2.5], P < .001), ulceration by 63% (OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.21-2.18], P < .001), and Clark level IV to V by 48% (OR 1.48 [95% CI 1.19-1.85]). Patients without ulceration but with dermal mitoses had 92% (OR 1.92 [95% CI 1.5-2.48], P < .001) increased SLN positivity. Limited survival data are available. Younger age, a Breslow thickness >0.8 mm, the presence of dermal mitoses, ulceration, and Clark level IV to V are positive predictors of positive SLN. While the new American Joint Committee on Cancer system has removed dermal mitotic rate from staging, continued evaluation of dermal mitotic rate could be valuable for guiding surgical decision making about SLNB.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) specimens are often obtained from patients for further staging after these patients have undergone melanoma excision. Limited data regarding predictors of SLNB positivity in thin melanoma are available.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We sought to evaluate predictors of SLNB positivity in thin melanoma.
METHODS METHODS
Patients with cutaneous melanoma with a Breslow thickness ≤1.00 mm who received a SLNB were identified from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2014 (n = 9186). Predictors of SLNB positivity were analyzed using logistic regression.
RESULTS RESULTS
In a multivariate analysis, patients <60 years of age (P < .001) and Breslow thickness >0.8 mm (P = .03) were at increased risk for positive sentinel lymph node (SLN). Moreover, on multivariate analysis, the presence of dermal mitoses increased the odds of SLN positivity by 95% (odds ratio [OR] 1.95 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.53-2.5], P < .001), ulceration by 63% (OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.21-2.18], P < .001), and Clark level IV to V by 48% (OR 1.48 [95% CI 1.19-1.85]). Patients without ulceration but with dermal mitoses had 92% (OR 1.92 [95% CI 1.5-2.48], P < .001) increased SLN positivity.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Limited survival data are available.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Younger age, a Breslow thickness >0.8 mm, the presence of dermal mitoses, ulceration, and Clark level IV to V are positive predictors of positive SLN. While the new American Joint Committee on Cancer system has removed dermal mitotic rate from staging, continued evaluation of dermal mitotic rate could be valuable for guiding surgical decision making about SLNB.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30240775
pii: S0190-9622(18)32583-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.051
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

441-447

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Rosalynn R Z Conic (RRZ)

Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Jennifer Ko (J)

Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Giovanni Damiani (G)

Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Pauline Funchain (P)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Thomas Knackstedt (T)

Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Alok Vij (A)

Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Allison Vidimos (A)

Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Brian R Gastman (BR)

Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: gastmab@ccf.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH