The Value of Biomarkers in Major Cardiovascular Surgery Necessitating Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

cardiac injury biomarkers cardiac surgery inflammatory biomarkers renal injury biomarkers

Journal

Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2153-8174
Titre abrégé: Rev Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 100960007

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 11 08 2024
revised: 29 08 2024
accepted: 09 09 2024
medline: 1 11 2024
pubmed: 1 11 2024
entrez: 1 11 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The use of biomarkers in cardiovascular surgery is an evolving field with promising potential; however, current research remains largely limited, requiring further validation for routine clinical application. This review explores the application of biomarkers in cardiovascular surgery, focusing on heart failure, cardiac ischemia, and organ dysfunction, including renal, cerebral, pulmonary, and splanchnic impairments. Additionally, it examines the significance of biomarkers in assessing the inflammatory state and oxidative stress during the perioperative period, particularly in the context of major surgical trauma and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). From January 2018 to June 2024, we reviewed 133 studies and four systematic reviews and meta-analyses using the Medline, Embase, and Central databases, screening for pre- or postoperative biomarker levels in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Outcomes of interest were postoperative mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Studies reporting multivariable-adjusted risk estimates were included. The findings revealed that cardiac troponins (cTns) and creatine kinase isoenzyme MB (CK-MB) remain the most widely utilized biomarkers for assessing myocardial injury post-surgery. These elevated biomarker levels were consistently associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, including low cardiac output syndrome, prolonged ventilation, and mortality. Emerging biomarkers, such as heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (h-FABP) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), demonstrated promising early detection and risk stratification results. In particular, h-FABP increased rapidly within one hour of myocardial injury, peaking at 4-6 hours and returning to baseline within 24 hours. This rapid clearance makes h-FABP a valuable tool for early myocardial injury detection, potentially allowing for timely interventions. Inflammatory biomarkers, including hs-CRP and pentraxin 3 (PTX3), were found to be associated with poor outcomes, such as increased morbidity and mortality. Elevated preoperative levels of these markers were indicative of a heightened inflammatory response, correlating with worse postoperative recovery and higher rates of complications. Furthermore, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) emerged as a cost-effective and easily accessible predictor of postoperative outcomes. Elevated NLR values were linked to an increased risk of adverse events, including prolonged ventilation, low cardiac output syndrome, and overall mortality. Further, the practicality of measuring NLR through routine blood tests makes it viable for widespread clinical use. In conclusion, integrating biomarkers in cardiovascular surgery significantly advances predicting postoperative outcomes for cardiac surgery patients. Therefore, it is essential to categorize these biomarkers into two distinct groups in the future, inflammatory and non-inflammatory (related to organ damage), to improve understanding and enhance their clinical applicability. Future research should focus on standardizing the use of these biomarkers and exploring their combined predictive power to enhance risk stratification and improve patient prognosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39484111
doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2510355
pii: S1530-6550(24)01594-1
pmc: PMC11522763
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

355

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Adrian Stef (A)

Clinical Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Heart Institute "Niculae Stancioiu", "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Anesthesia and Intensive Care 2 Discipline, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Constantin Bodolea (C)

Anesthesia and Intensive Care 2 Discipline, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Ioana Corina Bocsan (IC)

Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Simona Sorana Cainap (SS)

Department of Mother and Child, 2nd Pediatric Discipline, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Alexandru Achim (A)

Cardiology Department, Heart Institute "Niculae Stancioiu", "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Adela Serban (A)

Cardiology Department, Heart Institute "Niculae Stancioiu", "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Aurelia Georgeta Solomonean (AG)

Clinical Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Heart Institute "Niculae Stancioiu", "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Nadina Tintiuc (N)

Clinical Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Heart Institute "Niculae Stancioiu", "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Anca Dana Buzoianu (AD)

Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Classifications MeSH