Exploring Nasal Wall Cartilage Asymmetry in Rhinoplasty: Implications for Postoperative Symmetry.
Asymmetry
Left sidedness
Nasal cartilage thickness
Upper and lower lateral cartilage
Journal
Aesthetic plastic surgery
ISSN: 1432-5241
Titre abrégé: Aesthetic Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7701756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Oct 2024
25 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
18
07
2024
accepted:
01
10
2024
medline:
26
10
2024
pubmed:
26
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Facial symmetry is prized for its association with health, genetic quality, and attractiveness, but minor asymmetries are common. Human asymmetry tends to favor the left side and is noticeable in various nose parts. However, the discrepancy in cartilage thickness between the nose's right and left sides remains understudied. This cross-sectional study involved 60 patients undergoing primary open rhinoplasty. During routine rhinoplasty Procedure, upper and lower lateral cartilage strips were excised from each patient, yielding four tissue samples. Tissue thickness and width were measured using a microscope stage calibration slide. This approach systematically assessed left and right cartilage thickness differences in primary open rhinoplasty patients, offering insights into nasal asymmetry and potential surgical implications. Out of 60 patients, 43 were female (72%) and 17 were male (28%). The mean thickness of upper lateral (UL) cartilage was 0.53 mm on the right and 0.54 mm on the left side (P value= 0.52). For lower lateral (LL) cartilage, the mean thickness was 0.50 mm on the right and 0.54 mm on the left side (P value < 0.001), indicating significant left-sided dominance. This dominance was consistent across both sexes. Our study highlights the significance of addressing subtle nasal cartilage asymmetries to improve postoperative symmetry. Modifying nasal cartilage microstructures during rhinoplasty can enhance both aesthetic and functional outcomes. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 39455456
doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04446-8
pii: 10.1007/s00266-024-04446-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Références
Baudouin JY, Tiberghien G (2004) Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol 117(3):313–332
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.07.002
Smith WM (2000) Hemispheric and facial asymmetry: gender differences. Laterality 5(3):251–258
doi: 10.1080/713754376
pubmed: 15513145
Carvalho B, Ballin AC, Becker RV, Berger CA, Hurtado JG, Mocellin M (2012) Rhinoplasty and facial asymmetry: analysis of subjective and anthropometric factors in the Caucasian nose. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 16(04):445–451
doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772012000400004
pubmed: 25991972
pmcid: 4432533
Hafezi F, Javdani A, Naghibzadeh B, Ashtiani AK (2017) Laterality and left-sidedness in the nose, face, and body: a new finding. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(12):e1590
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001590
pubmed: 29632770
pmcid: 5889430
Katsube M, Rolfe SM, Bortolussi SR, Yamaguchi Y, Richman JM, Yamada S, Vora SR (2019) Analysis of facial skeletal asymmetry during fetal development using μCT imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 22(Suppl 1):199–206
doi: 10.1111/ocr.12304
pubmed: 31074127
pmcid: 6512839
Shaner DJ, Peterson AE, Beattie OB, Bamforth JS (2000) Assessment of soft tissue facial asymmetry in medically normal and syndrome-affected individuals by analysis of landmarks and measurements. Am J Med Genet 93(2):143–154
doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20000717)93:2<143::AID-AJMG12>3.0.CO;2-Q
pubmed: 10869118
Hatzis GP, Sherry SD, Hogan GM, Finn RA (2004) Observations of the marginal incision and lateral crura alar cartilage asymmetry in rhinoplasty: a fixed cadaver study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 97(4):432–437
doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.012
Farkas LG (1994) Examination. In: Farkas LG (ed) Anthropometry of the head and face, 2nd edn. Raven Press, New York, pp 3–56
KazemiAshtiani A, Azarbakhsh M, Hafezi F, Naghibzadeh B (2020) Anthropometric analysis of the human skull for developmental left-sided asymmetry, new finding. Aesthet Plast Surg 44(1):186–190
doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01526-y
Berlin NF, Berssenbrügge P, Runte C, Wermker K, Jung S, Kleinheinz J, Dirksen D (2014) Quantification of facial asymmetry by 2D analysis–a comparison of recent approaches. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 42(3):265–271
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.07.033
Bashour M (2006) History and current concepts in the analysis of facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(3):741–756
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000233051.61512.65
pubmed: 16932186
Hafezi F, Kouchakzadeh K, Naghibzadeh B (2009) History and status of nose surgery. Iran J Surg 17(2):88–94
Hafezi F, Naghibzadeh B, Nouhi A, Yavari P (2010) Asymmetric facial growth and deviated nose: a new concept. Ann Plast Surg 64(1):47–51
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819ae02d
pubmed: 20010413
Hafezi F, Naghibzadeh B, Ashtiani AK, Guyuron B, Nouhi AH, Naghibzadeh G (2014) Straight septum, crooked nose: an overlooked concept. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0230-1
doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0230-1
Hafezi F, Naghipour R, Naghibzadeh B, Ashtiani AK, Forghani SF (2020) Practical classification of upper lateral cartilage in middle vault asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(6):1410–1417
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006815
pubmed: 32195863